Testim vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Testim and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Testim is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Testim holds a 2.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Testim users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,975 Views
1,725 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,376 Views
10,474 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Testim

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Tricentis Tosca and Testim compete in the test automation sector. Testim excels in features and ease of deployment, while Tosca may have a pricing advantage.

Features: Tricentis Tosca includes a model-based test automation suite, seamless platform integration, and versatile testing capabilities. Testim provides AI-powered testing, rapid test creation, and efficient maintenance, with smart automation solutions.

Room for Improvement:Tosca could improve its ease of deployment and reduce initial setup complexity. Enhancing user-friendliness for non-technical users would be beneficial. Testim might benefit from expanding its feature set for larger enterprise use, improving documentation, and enhancing deeper integration with other tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers a detailed deployment model with extensive support, which can be time-consuming. Testim provides a streamlined deployment process with responsive customer service, facilitating quick adoption and turnaround.

Pricing and ROI: Tosca involves higher setup costs but offers substantial long-term ROI for larger enterprises. Testim provides a cost-effective model with a quick setup process, appealing to businesses seeking efficient returns with a smaller investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Testim vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Testim is 2.8%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 12.0%, down from 20.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	12.0%
Testim	2.8%
Other	85.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The stability has been great; we can add stable tests very easily and improve our automation coverage, which allows us to deploy a new version into production every few days with minimum manual labor."

"We primarily use the solution for business E2E testing, as it is fast and reliable, easy to maintain, and allows for the involvement of QA as well as Dev and BA."

"It enabled us to cover our app in end-to-end tests very quickly with quality results."

"The Testim technical support is very responsive and worked with a specific team member on the First Databank side to answer hard technical questions and took enhancement requests as needed."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

More Testim pros

"The scalability is a valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca."

"Before implementing Tosca, the average time that we took for completing regression was about four days, and after we started using Tosca, it has been reduced to six hours."

"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."

"We have, within the first six months, been able to automate 85% of our critical business processes and we have been able to maintain that while keeping our BCR ratio down, and we have also seen about 234 defects per month in production drop to less than 8."

"It is easy to maintain and easy to automate, no coding skills are required to automate, and it is also easy in terms of transferring knowledge and skills."

"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."

"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."

"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps, and it is also a product that can be used by business people."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind, for instance - instead of going in and out of the editor every time I want to view test data for a test, I could just view the test data in the table, or the ability to copy steps through tests."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

More Testim cons

"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."

"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."

"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."

"Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It should improve the testing of legacy systems and interfaces."

"I feel that the Tosca tool should be improved for handling Siebel applications. Tosca doesn't handle Siebel applications as well as it handles other platform applications."

"What needs to be improved in Tricentis Tosca is its centralized repository mechanism because it's not as flexible. The repository in the solution where you store the data and the script for test automation is quite an old-fashioned mechanism that could be improved."

"Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use."

"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"My understanding is that it's an expensive product, although I don't know the specifics with regards to pricing."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

"Tosca is expensive. I don't see small and medium customers going for it. It's always large enterprises that have a big pocket. It is very expensive as compared to the other tools that we have in the market. They should reduce the price by half, and if they do that, they would do better business. From the competition perspective, other solutions are at a pretty similar level. UiPath is also very expensive. One thing that I always wanted was a short-term consumption license. With Tricentis, the biggest challenge is that you have to go for a minimum of one year license, and they also try to sell you a three-year license. It would be good if people can get a three-month or four-month consumption license."

"If you are purchasing less than five licenses, then the pricing is high. On a scale from one to ten, with one being low and ten being high pricing, I would rate this solution at eight."

"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."

"The tool is quite expensive."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Testim?

As a Quality Engineering leader, I'm responsible for testing our 20-25 applications. Manual testing is becoming increasingly challenging due to their growing scope and complexity. We've been automa...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 7% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Avo Assure vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 2% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Testim

March 2026

Download Testim product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. Tricentis Tosca

March 2026

Free Report: Testim vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about Testim vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Testim vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.