Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

UiPath Test Cloud vs Worksoft Certify comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
UiPath Test Cloud delivers rapid ROI by reducing development time, execution costs, and optimizing resource usage despite high initial setup costs.
Sentiment score
7.6
Early adopters report significant labor, time, and cost savings, with up to 70% reduction in testing times and 583% ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
UiPath Test Cloud is praised for its responsive, knowledgeable support team, despite some concerns about extended support costs.
Sentiment score
6.6
Worksoft Certify's customer support is generally responsive and improving, but varies in quality and faces occasional communication barriers.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
UiPath Test Cloud offers scalable, efficient automation management, excelling in regression testing with adaptable deployment, despite integration and cost challenges.
Sentiment score
7.7
Worksoft Certify is scalable with advanced features but faces challenges like licensing, supporting large-scale projects and customizable output.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
UiPath Test Cloud offers reliable testing with occasional connectivity issues, rated mostly between seven to nine for stability.
Sentiment score
7.2
Certify is stable and reliable for daily use, with occasional issues primarily related to specific components and resource limitations.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
 

Room For Improvement

UiPath Test Cloud requires improved mobile automation, integration, usability, management features, logging, pricing, and enhanced testing capabilities.
Worksoft Certify needs improved performance, user interface simplification, better integration, enhanced technical support, and more intuitive documentation and training resources.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find UiPath Test Cloud costly but justified by comprehensive features, suggesting a unified license for efficiency.
Worksoft Certify's licensing is costly but justified by stability, offering various options and flexible concurrent licensing for global teams.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
 

Valuable Features

UiPath Test Cloud streamlines automation with test tools, low-code integration, fast execution, and AI features, reducing costs and effort.
Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation with drag-and-drop, reusable tests, and seamless integration, enhancing efficiency and flexibility across environments.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
 

Categories and Ranking

UiPath Test Cloud
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Worksoft Certify
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (9th), API Testing Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 4.2%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Deborah Yarosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement
UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.
Shailesh-Parkhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful automation tool with a user-friendly interface, codeless automation, and adaptability to complex business processes, particularly in SAP environments
The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers. Even during the initial learning phase, I found it remarkably user-friendly. It facilitates quick onboarding and training of new resources. It offers features for building automation scripts, such as search and certify capture. A notable advantage is that it doesn't rely on other tools like Micro Focus UFT or Micro Focus ALM for script execution. Worksoft can run independently without the need for support from Microsoft Office, although the option to use it for maintaining data exists. The tool also includes debugging features and comprehensive reporting capabilities, generating PDF reports for easy analysis.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
10%
Retailer
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it. Although justified by the solution's capability, excessive costs should not be necessary...
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath ...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?
A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.
 

Also Known As

Test Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath Test Cloud vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.