Ranorex Studio vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Ranorex and Worksoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Ranorex is ranked #16, while Worksoft is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. Ranorex holds a 4.3% mindshare in TAt, compared to Worksoft’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Ranorex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

2,917 Views
2,479 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 69 Worksoft Certify reviews

3,600 Views
2,772 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Ranorex Studio are strong competitors in the automation testing tools market. Worksoft Certify appears to have an advantage in ERP automation, especially for SAP, while Ranorex Studio stands out for its robust UI recognition and cross-platform capabilities.

Features: Worksoft Certify offers lights-out testing, supports a variety of ERP systems including SAP, and is a no-code platform suitable for users lacking programming skills. It integrates with various applications using Capture 2.0 for effective process documentation. Ranorex Studio excels in UI recognition, offers scripting flexibility with C#, and supports cross-browser and mobile testing with ease. Its seamless integration with third-party tools and strong module support enhances its automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify has challenges with complex upgrades, lacks web application support, and its UI could be more intuitive. Other issues include database management and limited report customization. Ranorex Studio's limitations include multi-OS support beyond Windows and insufficient modular capabilities for concurrent tests. Its UI is somewhat outdated, integration with Angular can be tricky, and users seek better API documentation and language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify is mainly used in on-premises and hybrid environments. While customer service is positively noted, there can be slow response times from technical support. Ranorex Studio is adaptable for both private and public cloud setups, praised for its responsive customer service, though support quality may vary with different representatives.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify is pricier, reflecting its value in large ERP deployments like SAP, offering significant ROI through reduced manual testing time. Smaller setups may find its costs less feasible, leading to calls for more flexible licensing. Ranorex Studio, similarly expensive, provides cost-effectiveness for smaller teams due to its floating licenses, with ROI driven by its extensive feature set covering diverse testing requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (9th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.3%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 4.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Worksoft Certify	4.1%
Ranorex Studio	4.3%
Other	91.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Srabanti Pramanik

Project Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Has streamlined SAP test automation and reduced regression cycle time through no-code capabilities

Worksoft Certify is a no-code tool that works effectively with SAP, and I appreciate all the features compared to other tools. Teams who are planning for automation and are still in manual testing can use Worksoft Certify, and significant time and resources will be reduced. Reporting for Worksoft Certify is also excellent; we have the BPP reports customized, and recently WRS has been implemented, so all these features are beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Object identification is good."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is the capture and replay tool. You don't need to do script testing. When you launch any application from Ranorex Studio it automatically captures these test case steps. The next time you can replay the tool the flow automatically happens again. For example, when you do the logging and all the activity will be captured by the tool, and re-execute the same step by using automatization."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"This is a powerful, reliable and versatile all-around application testing suite."

More Ranorex Studio pros

"What I like about Worksoft Certify is that end-to-end testing becomes faster."

"It is a lot easier to maintain test scripts on Worksoft Certify than on other testing tools that we have had in the past."

"People who don't have coding knowledge are capable of doing automation with Certify. It reduces coding and scripting dependencies."

"Automation using Worksoft Certify has saved our testing times by 40% to 50%."

"Worksoft Certify has good integration capabilities with third-party tools."

"It's very different versus other tools in the past, which were not very modern. It easy for people to automate."

"It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that allows for reusability, meaning a lot of reuse of VA01, if they're very similar flows, to keep it simple."

"Certify's web UI testing abilities for testing of modern applications like SAP Fiori was good when we started and they developed it to be even better. We all know that web applications can change objects in DOM quite fast and it breaks tests. To counter it Certify has made object recognition more flexible and generic, so we don't have any troubles."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"When we have updated the solution in the past there have been issues with the libraries. They need to make it clear that the libraries need to be upgraded too."

"There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman."

"Binding to other sources is very good but the object recognition in .NET desktop applications often doesn't work."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"The object detection functionality needs to be improved."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

More Ranorex Studio cons

"Worksoft Certify's tech support's response time could be improved."

"I am aware that they have some challenges with some of their support resources, especially offshore which is very common. I don't think this is specifically a Worksoft issue. It always seems to be a software issue, and I know that Worksoft is aware of this and they are trying to make some improvements."

"We can use it for the web application, but we are facing stability-related challenges. The properties are getting changed. For example, when I am performing any operation on the text box but the development team has done some changes, our Worksoft scripts are getting changed. This is the main challenge that we are facing while developing tests for the web application in Worksoft Certify, where any changes in the backend are indirectly impacting our scripts. For the web application, there is a scarcity of resources. Unlike an SAP application that doesn't require much experience, for the web application, you require experienced people."

"The problem with Worksoft Certify is that it's not always stable. It runs on a live platform that's constantly changing, so the test script needs to be adjusted every time, which is very painful."

"We would like this to be able to be used outside of SAP applications, as it would be good for other types of products."

"I would like BPP to have more filtering options during the report creation. This would make our customers happy."

"As part of our weekly regression, we wanted to use Execution Manager. However, from 2017 until March 2021, Execution Manager was not working as expected in our enrollment. It could have been better. If Execution Manager had worked well, then we could have doubled our productivity. Unfortunately, it had problems."

"I would like to see the impact analysis integrated with the performance testing tool. We have multiple tools doing multiple items. I would like to have one common tool."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product."

"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."

"This solution has enabled our clients to automate and save time (approximately 40 to 50 percent)."

"Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost."

"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."

"In general, they changed their license model. Before you had to buy licenses for each component, and now they changed it so you can buy a license and use it for nearly all their applications."

"The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks."

"Purchasing and licensing are okay. Go for the perpetual licenses. In that way, you own a license, then you can purchase maintenance and support on top of that, so you don't have to pay every year for it. Even if you don't want it a contract with Worksoft Certify in the future, you will have your own license of it. Then, if your usage is not that much, you can have one or two perpetual licenses. However, if you want to run your processes, you will need more licenses, e.g., using the run-only licenses. They are really cheap compared to the full licensing."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

16%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I would rate the pricing for the product as reasonable. As it is a quality tool, the price is slightly higher, but that is acceptable compared to other tools, especially considering the ROI.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 22% of the time

Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 13% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 9% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 64% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

October 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

October 2025

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Overview

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

October 2025

Free Report: Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.