Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ranorex Studio vs Worksoft Certify comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Worksoft Certify's customer support is generally responsive and improving, but varies in quality and faces occasional communication barriers.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.5
Worksoft Certify needs improved performance, user interface simplification, better integration, enhanced technical support, and more intuitive documentation and training resources.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
Worksoft Certify is scalable with advanced features but faces challenges like licensing, supporting large-scale projects and customizable output.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Worksoft Certify's licensing is costly but justified by stability, offering various options and flexible concurrent licensing for global teams.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.4
Certify is stable and reliable for daily use, with occasional issues primarily related to specific components and resource limitations.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation with drag-and-drop, reusable tests, and seamless integration, enhancing efficiency and flexibility across environments.
 

Categories and Ranking

Ranorex Studio
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
16th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), Regression Testing Tools (7th)
Worksoft Certify
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
8th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 4.9%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 4.3%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Aws V - PeerSpot reviewer
Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.
Shailesh-Parkhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful automation tool with a user-friendly interface, codeless automation, and adaptability to complex business processes, particularly in SAP environments
The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers. Even during the initial learning phase, I found it remarkably user-friendly. It facilitates quick onboarding and training of new resources. It offers features for building automation scripts, such as search and certify capture. A notable advantage is that it doesn't rely on other tools like Micro Focus UFT or Micro Focus ALM for script execution. Worksoft can run independently without the need for support from Microsoft Office, although the option to use it for maintaining data exists. The tool also includes debugging features and comprehensive reporting capabilities, generating PDF reports for easy analysis.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Retailer
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?
Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?
I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.
What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding languag...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?
A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Ranorex Studio vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.