Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio comparison

Qt Group and Ranorex are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while Ranorex is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7. Qt Group holds a 3.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to Ranorex’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Qt Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.

Qt Squish

Read 20 Qt Squish reviews

2,521 Views
1,373 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Ranorex Studio

Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews

3,084 Views
2,346 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Ranorex Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Ranorex Studio and Qt Squish are competing in the software testing automation category. Ranorex Studio often has the upper hand in pricing and support, whereas Qt Squish is valued for its robust feature set and cross-platform capabilities.

Features: Ranorex Studio's standout features include codeless testing capabilities, ease of use, and integration with various testing frameworks. Qt Squish distinguishes itself with its powerful support for cross-platform testing, a wide range of supported programming languages, and scripting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Ranorex Studio could enhance its platform support, integration options, and flexibility for technical users. Qt Squish might improve its user interface to be more beginner-friendly, enhance script management, and reduce its setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ranorex Studio offers a straightforward deployment process, emphasizing quick implementation and extensive customer support. Qt Squish provides deployment flexibility with technical support focused on in-depth problem resolution, catering to diverse customer needs.

Pricing and ROI: Ranorex Studio is considered cost-effective, providing competitive setup costs and a clear return on investment through efficient testing. Qt Squish entails higher initial costs but offers significant long-term ROI due to its advanced features and cross-platform capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,615 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ranorex Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (15th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), Regression Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 5.0%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Luc Vangrunderbeeck

Software Test Engineer at Infrabel

Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability

There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.

Read full review

Aws V

IT Team Leader -Automation Manager at Citco

Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet

There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"It is very stable."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I can perform Java Svelte testing."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"I'm from a UFT background, so Ranorex Studio has a similar feel in terms of how it handles objects. It just felt familiar even though I'd never seen it before. However, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of UFT, but it's a pretty good start, and it's cost-effective."

"Code Conversion is one of the great features because sometimes, the automation tool doesn't have the capability of maneuvering around two specific evaluations."

"Support is very quick. You can write to them and on the same day, they will respond. This is one of the best features."

"The solution is intuitive and pretty self-sustaining. You don't need a lot of help with it in terms of setup or assistance."

"The solutions's regression testing is very important for our company, as is the continuous integration process."

"The scalability is very good. It's probably one of the better tools I've seen on the market."

"The most valuable feature of Ranorex Studio is its user-friendly interface."

"I like the recording function and Ranorex Spy."

More Ranorex Studio pros

Cons

"The price could be better."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

"For our purposes it requires integration with other products to get out the results in the format we want them. Adding this to the product could improve it."

"One of the areas the service could be improved would be to have the training in Italian."

"We are mainly working for manufacturing OEMs but the integration is not available. It would be a benefit if they built one integration tool for all the Teamcenter home servers and software as the main PLM data source. It is a simple process at this time, the integration could be made easier."

"If there are many queries on the web page, Ranorex will not render the page correctly. I had about 1,000 queries on the page, and the solution was not able to handle it."

"Ranorex is used in Windows while other solutions, for example, Katalon Studio, are cross-platform. (But in my opinion, overall, Ranorex is better)."

"The automation of the SAP application could perhaps be improved to make it much simpler."

"I would like to be able to customize the data grids. They are currently written in Visual Basic and we are unable to get down to the cell level without hard-code."

"Part of the challenge is that Ranorex's support is over in Europe, so we can't get responses on the same day. If we had support in the United States that was a bit more timely, that would be helpful."

More Ranorex Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"There are several types of licenses and you need to choose depending on your needs and level of usage."

"This solution is a more expensive solution compared to some of the other competitors."

"Our company has one license per user with each costing two lakh rupees."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users."

"We paid €3,000 (approximately $3,300 USD) for this solution. When you add the runtime licenses it will be €3,500 (approximately $3,900 USD)."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,615 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

Qt and Squish are considered to be on the expensive side compared to other software development tools. The pricing is not very flexible, which has been noted as a concern.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version. Upgrading Qt and Squish can be annoying and would be better if Squish were more integrated with Qt, to ease the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework fo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?

Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?

I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 13% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 11% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 6% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 25% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Ranorex Studio

Compared 5% of the time

More Ranorex Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

January 2025

Download Qt Squish product report

Buyer's Guide

Ranorex Studio

January 2025

Download Ranorex Studio product report

Also Known As

froglogic Squish

No data available

Overview

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Qt Group

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

Ranorex

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio

January 2025

Free Report: Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,615 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qt Squish vs. Ranorex Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.