Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT One vs Ranorex Studio comparison

OpenText and Ranorex are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Ranorex is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 9.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Ranorex’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Ranorex users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT One
Read 93 OpenText UFT One reviews
  • 8,465 Views
  • 5,308 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Ranorex Studio
Read 46 Ranorex Studio reviews
  • 2,429 Views
  • 1,828 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Ranorex Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,636 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
OpenText customer service is praised for responsiveness, though experiences vary, with mixed satisfaction levels and reliance on partners for support.
No sentiment score available
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Ranorex Studio report
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.5
OpenText UFT One needs better object identification, browser compatibility, AI, integration, and interface, with concerns on cost and stability.
No sentiment score available
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Ranorex Studio report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
OpenText UFT One offers scalability and flexibility, though users note speed and browser issues; licensing affects usage costs.
No sentiment score available
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Ranorex Studio report
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
OpenText UFT One is praised for robust automation but criticized for high costs and complex licensing options.
No sentiment score available
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Ranorex Studio report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
OpenText UFT One's stability is generally reliable but varies with system requirements and can be affected by version changes.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
OpenText UFT One excels in cross-platform compatibility, versatile scripting, and efficient automation for desktop, web, and mobile testing.
No sentiment score available
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText UFT One report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Ranorex Studio report
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT One
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
2nd
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
2nd
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
2nd
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (4th)
Ranorex Studio
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
16th
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
4th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
7th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 9.5%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ranorex Studio is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Q&A Highlights

it_user500790 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 24, 2016
SAP GUI Testing Tool
Thanks all, it's encouraging to see so much support and responses
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

Don Ingerson - PeerSpot reviewer
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results
With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files. For Web browsers, UFT 12.54 supports IE9, IE10, IE11, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome (versions 31.0 to 54.9), Firefox (versions 27.0 to 49.0). Besides GUI testing, UFT supports database testing and API testing (Docker, WSDL, and SOAP). For the first time ever, HP started to expand the testing capabilities of UFT (QTP) beyond Windows beginning with UFT 12.00. A UFT user can now run tests on Web applications on a Safari browser that is running on a remote Mac computer.
Read full review
Aws V - PeerSpot reviewer
Good data security, allowing local installations to prevent data from going to the internet
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding language support beyond C#, Java, and JavaScript to include Python would be beneficial. An AI feature that automatically detects automation object properties and suggests actions would be a great addition. So, in future releases, AI solutions for automated property identification would be helpful.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

it_user500790 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 24, 2016
Aug 24, 2016
SAP GUI Testing Tool
Thanks all, it's encouraging to see so much support and responses
2 out of 16 answers
it_user83412 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2016
All of these solutions are based on scripts and face the associated limitations. Test data management, parameterization, dynamic TBOMs, BPCA, SolMan integration and script maintenance all pose potential issues. I'd recommend looking at Tricentis Tosca or Worksoft, both of which provide scriptless automation for SAP GUI. Tosca also supports Fiori and NWBC natively as well as over 30 different UI and API technologies. [FULL DISCLOSURE: I work for Tricentis, so obviously biased, but we serve many SAP clients]
Read full answer
it_user457878 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2016
UFT will support or Tricentis TOSCA .
Read full answer
See all 16 answers
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
The solution should have additional features, but not much. It already has some sort of artificial intelligence that must be developed. It needs to be in trend. The solution needs better marketing,...
See all answers
What do you like most about Ranorex Studio?
Data security was prime for us. Being able to download and run tests on our local machines was a big plus. The flexibility Ranorex offers in terms of customization is outstanding.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ranorex Studio?
I'd rate it around five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, not too cheap but not overly pricey.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ranorex Studio?
There were a lot of issues we faced. One notable improvement would be better API integration within the tool itself, as we still rely on external tools like Postman. Additionally, expanding languag...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 31% of the time
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 11% of the time
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One Logo
Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 10% of the time
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One Logo
UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 8% of the time
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT One Logo
OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT One
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText UFT One Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Ranorex Studio
Compared 25% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio Logo
Katalon Studio vs Ranorex Studio
Compared 18% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Ranorex Studio
Compared 15% of the time
Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio Logo
Qt Squish vs Ranorex Studio
Compared 13% of the time
Selenium HQ vs Ranorex Studio Logo
Selenium HQ vs Ranorex Studio
Compared 5% of the time
More Ranorex Studio Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One
November 2024
OpenText UFT One reportDownload OpenText UFT One product report
Buyer's Guide
Ranorex Studio
November 2024
Ranorex Studio reportDownload Ranorex Studio product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
No data available
 

Learn More

OpenText
Ranorex
 

Overview

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.

 

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
Siemens, TomTom, Adidas, Canon, Lufthansa, Roche, Cisco, Philipps, Dell, Motorola, Toshiba, Citrix, Ericsson, sage, Continental, IBM, Credit Suisse, Vodafone
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio
November 2024
Free Report: OpenText UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT One vs. Ranorex Studio report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.