OpenText UFT One and OpenText UFT Developer are automation testing tools aimed at different testing needs, with UFT One excelling in GUI testing and UFT Developer favored for developer-centric environments. UFT One has the upper hand for extensive GUI testing capabilities, while UFT Developer is preferred for its seamless integration into developer workflows.
Features: UFT One supports extensive GUI testing, integrates well with Application Lifecycle Management (ALM), and offers broad technology support for desktop and web applications. UFT Developer integrates seamlessly with IDEs like Visual Studio and Eclipse, supports agile development, and provides flexibility for code-based testing using Java or C#. UFT One's object repository and object recognition features add significant value for automating complex test scripts.
Room for Improvement: UFT One could enhance performance efficiency and improve compatibility with certain modern technologies, addressing issues like high memory usage. UFT Developer has room to expand its feature set to cover more technologies and enhance integration with desktop applications. Stability improvements and support for new web technologies are needed for both products.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UFT One offers more deployment options including on-premises and private cloud, while both products can be deployed in public clouds. Customer service feedback is mixed, with appreciation for support but noted delays, especially for UFT Developer where third-party support is often preferred.
Pricing and ROI: UFT One is costly but offers potential ROI through comprehensive feature utilization across various environments. UFT Developer's pricing reflects its specialized use, and both tools deliver substantial ROI when used effectively to automate complex processes and reduce manual efforts.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.
Read white paper
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.