Dec 01, 2021
UFT One is the one you need.
OpenText UFT One and OpenText UFT Developer compete in the software testing category. OpenText UFT Developer seems to have the upper hand with its advanced functionality and flexible scripting, while OpenText UFT One receives recognition for pricing and support.
Features: Users highlight OpenText UFT One for its robust testing options, comprehensive automation capabilities, and strong integrations. OpenText UFT Developer is valued for agile testing support, flexible scripting, and seamless integration into modern pipelines.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One users suggest improving execution speed, enhancing intuitive configuration processes, and optimizing resource consumption. OpenText UFT Developer users indicate a need for better documentation, enhanced real-device testing options, and increased support for older platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One has smoother deployment cycles and responsive customer support, providing faster setup and troubleshooting. OpenText UFT Developer, while noted for its lightweight deployment model, has mixed reviews regarding customer service responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is seen as cost-effective with strong ROI, offering lower upfront setup costs. UFT Developer provides a higher long-term ROI due to its superior feature set, though initial costs are higher, making it worth the investment for advanced testing capabilities.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
