Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.2
Organizations achieve 70% ROI improvement by expanding OpenText UFT Developer users, reducing costs, and enhancing test automation efficiency.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
IBM DevOps Test UI users praise effective technical support for responsive, timely solutions, benefiting from consistent global partnership assistance.
Sentiment score
5.7
OpenText UFT Developer users report mixed support experiences, citing responsive technical help but inconsistent communication and slow response times.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
IBM DevOps Test UI is scalable for multiple users but needs better mobile support despite being effective for functional testing.
Sentiment score
6.7
OpenText UFT Developer excels in scalability and integration across platforms, despite some licensing cost and script development challenges.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
IBM DevOps Test UI is stable with minor memory issues and potential concerns over future mobile support.
Sentiment score
6.8
OpenText UFT Developer's stability is mixed; recent updates help, but it remains less reliable than alternatives like Selenium.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM DevOps Test UI needs improved reporting, integration, compatibility, efficiency, and accessibility for better user experience.
OpenText UFT Developer needs performance, compatibility, and interface improvements while offering scriptless automation to increase adoption.
 

Setup Cost

IBM DevOps Test UI offers competitive licensing, ranging $10,000-$30,000, covering support and multiple projects per user-license.
OpenText UFT Developer is costly with flexible licensing models, primarily used by large enterprises due to its high expense.
 

Valuable Features

IBM DevOps Test UI enables efficient test automation with robust features and integrates with various technologies and management tools.
OpenText UFT Developer excels with multi-language support, seamless integration, and AI recognition, enhancing test automation and productivity.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
28th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (15th)
OpenText UFT Developer
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
14th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.6%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

HZ
Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support
The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.
Mohamed Bosri - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient recording feature shines amid expected desktop and website enhancements
Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?
There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?
It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?
The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites. It is also suggested that the design and some functionality could be better.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester
Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edumate
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT Developer and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.