IBM DevOps Test UI vs OpenText UFT Developer comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #29, while OpenText is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 0.6% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

909 Views
543 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Developer

Read 37 OpenText UFT Developer reviews

2,342 Views
1,512 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

OpenText UFT Developer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and OpenText UFT Developer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT Developer Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT Developer

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

29th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (15th)

OpenText UFT Developer

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.6%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT Developer is 2.9%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

Mohamed Bosri

Process Architect Referent at Forvia

Efficient recording feature shines amid expected desktop and website enhancements

Our use case involves functionality for a system ERP. We work with Deviation, which is stable and receives positive feedback from users OpenText UFT Developer allows junior testers to learn through open source and online resources like YouTube. They can find solutions to issues even if the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"Integrates well with other products."

"One aspect that I like about Micro Focus UFT Developer is the ability to integrate it into a testing framework as a library."

"The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases."

"The recording feature is quite good as it helps us to find out how things are working."

"The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local."

"This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us."

"I like the tool because we can still access the devices' distance. It's not important where you're working. For example, I can use it in Brazil, Chile, and other parts where people are working. After the pandemic, many companies use it for homework. I think using it to administer and manage the devices is very good and effective."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks."

More OpenText UFT Developer pros

Cons

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support."

"UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive."

"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure."

"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

"The solution could improve by working better with desktop applications and websites."

"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."

More OpenText UFT Developer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."

"It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."

"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

"The pricing is quite high compared to the competition."

"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."

"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."

"The price of the solution could be lowered. The cost is approximately $25 per year for a subscription-based license."

More OpenText UFT Developer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There are many good things. Like it is intuitive and scripting was easy. Plus the availability of experienced resources in India due to its market leadership.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus UFT Developer?

It's a high-priced solution compared to Selenium. Selenium is free, though there is a paid version now too. Selenium has improved a lot, and it's still okay to use. It's a functional testing tool, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Developer?

There's room for improvement, especially when I compare OpenText to newer tools like NeoLoad. NeoLoad is a strong competitor to LoadRunner and it's very fast. It saves a lot of time when creating s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 25% of the time

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 22% of the time

HCL OneTest vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 14% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 57% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 5% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 4% of the time

Eggplant Test vs OpenText UFT Developer

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText UFT Developer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2024

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Developer

November 2024

Download OpenText UFT Developer product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

Micro Focus UFT Developer, UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT

Learn More

Video not available

IBM

OpenText

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

With OpenText UFT Developer, you get object identification tools, parallel testing, and record/replay capabilities.

Sample Customers

Edumate

Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT Developer

November 2024

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT Developer

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT Developer and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. OpenText UFT Developer report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.