Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Qt Group and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. Qt Group holds a 3.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to Tricentis’s 22.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Qt Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Qt Squish

Read 19 Qt Squish reviews

2,521 Views
1,373 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 109 Tricentis Tosca reviews

19,262 Views
10,446 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and Qt Squish are competing in the software testing domain, each having unique strengths. Tricentis Tosca holds the upper hand with its advanced automation capabilities, appealing for organizations needing robust testing solutions.

Features: Tricentis Tosca provides strong support for model-based testing, continuous testing capabilities, and ease of integration with other enterprise applications. Qt Squish offers cross-platform testing support, detailed object-oriented scripting capabilities, and seamless integration with multiple frameworks.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could improve its flexibility for integration with a broader range of programming environments. Users report a higher learning curve for non-standard integrations. Additionally, enhancing the initial cost-effectiveness could widen its appeal. For Qt Squish, expanding its model-based testing capabilities and simplifying integration with enterprise applications can enhance its market position. Users also point to a need for faster deployment solutions to reduce setup times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers a streamlined deployment process and extensive customer support, appealing to enterprises new to automated testing. Qt Squish offers comprehensive technical assistance but requires a steeper learning curve due to its flexible deployment options catering to various environments.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca generally involves higher setup costs but ensures significant ROI through reduced testing times and labor costs. Qt Squish offers a more economical starting price, making it ideal for companies seeking tailored testing frameworks, though it may result in a slower ROI. Tosca's higher initial investment is offset by its time-saving efficiencies, whereas Squish’s affordability attracts budget-conscious businesses prioritizing flexibility over immediate ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 22.9%, up from 19.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable

There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.

Read full review

Antonio Oteri

IT Telecom Quality Senior Tester at TIM

Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation

From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."

"Software testing tool that has multiple features. It's good to use for SAP testing, and it helps reduce test execution time."

"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are the Salesforce scanning. There are two scanning for Salesforce applications. There is Salesforce scanning and normal application scanning. Object identification has been really useful in Tricentis Tosca."

"I am impressed with the product's script test."

"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."

"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."

"I face no challenges or stability issues."

"The initial setup isn't too difficult."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The price could be better."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It should improve the testing of legacy systems and interfaces."

"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."

"They can make it more stable. I have used this tool for SAP applications. They have an alliance with SAP, and it mostly worked fine, but there were a few glitches. However, we got the required support from the Tricentis team. They are coming up with their new versions and upgrades with respect to how the Tricentis systems as cloud applications are updated, and it would be good if they have a robust accelerator pack."

"The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work."

"It needs better integration with JIRA."

"The technical support services are generally good, though there are areas for improvement regarding response time and overall competence."

"I would say the reporting part of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"We faced some hardships in implementing the solution because of integration."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."

"The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."

"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."

"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."

"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."

"In terms of the licensing costs for Tricentis Tosca, we are spending more or less $70,000 per year. We have a very complex mechanism because there are some business users and some BI users, so the licensing structure is not simple, but support is included."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

Qt and Squish are considered to be on the expensive side compared to other software development tools. The pricing is not very flexible, which has been noted as a concern.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version. Upgrading Qt and Squish can be annoying and would be better if Squish were more integrated with Qt, to ease the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework fo...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish

Compared 13% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 10% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 6% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

January 2025

Download Qt Squish product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

December 2024

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

froglogic Squish

No data available

Learn More

Qt Group

Tricentis

Overview

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca

January 2025

Free Report: Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.