Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qt Squish vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Qt Group and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. Qt Group holds a 3.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to Tricentis’s 22.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Qt Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.
Qt Squish
Read 19 Qt Squish reviews
  • 2,572 Views
  • 1,405 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Tricentis Tosca
Read 107 Tricentis Tosca reviews
  • 19,911 Views
  • 10,676 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and Qt Squish are competing in the software testing domain, each having unique strengths. Tricentis Tosca holds the upper hand with its advanced automation capabilities, appealing for organizations needing robust testing solutions.

Features: Tricentis Tosca provides strong support for model-based testing, continuous testing capabilities, and ease of integration with other enterprise applications. Qt Squish offers cross-platform testing support, detailed object-oriented scripting capabilities, and seamless integration with multiple frameworks.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could improve its flexibility for integration with a broader range of programming environments. Users report a higher learning curve for non-standard integrations. Additionally, enhancing the initial cost-effectiveness could widen its appeal. For Qt Squish, expanding its model-based testing capabilities and simplifying integration with enterprise applications can enhance its market position. Users also point to a need for faster deployment solutions to reduce setup times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers a streamlined deployment process and extensive customer support, appealing to enterprises new to automated testing. Qt Squish offers comprehensive technical assistance but requires a steeper learning curve due to its flexible deployment options catering to various environments.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca generally involves higher setup costs but ensures significant ROI through reduced testing times and labor costs. Qt Squish offers a more economical starting price, making it ideal for companies seeking tailored testing frameworks, though it may result in a slower ROI. Tosca's higher initial investment is offset by its time-saving efficiencies, whereas Squish’s affordability attracts budget-conscious businesses prioritizing flexibility over immediate ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Qt Squish users saved time by automating tests, supporting agile practices with 50% coverage, benefiting organizations including non-profits.
Sentiment score
7.1
Tricentis Tosca offers significant ROI and testing efficiency, ideal for large companies but less beneficial for short-term projects.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.3
Qt Squish customer support is praised for quick, effective service, with users valuing responsive, competent assistance and engineering solutions.
Sentiment score
6.9
Tricentis Tosca's customer service is praised for responsiveness but criticized for delays and inconsistent resolution times.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Tricentis Tosca is highly scalable for various applications, though there are some infrastructure and licensing cost challenges.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
Tricentis Tosca is stable, reliable, and highly rated, despite occasional minor issues with environment, network, and cloud storage.
 

Room For Improvement

Tricentis Tosca needs improvements in integrations, performance, UI testing, AI features, mobile support, and better customer support.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find Qt Squish easy to set up but costly, with simple yet inflexible named and group licensing.
Tricentis Tosca's high licensing costs and complexity are often prohibitive for smaller organizations but beneficial for large enterprises.
 

Valuable Features

Tricentis Tosca excels in scriptless automation, model-based testing, and ease of use, making it ideal for comprehensive testing.
 

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 22.7%, up from 19.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable
There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.
Read full review
Antonio Oteri - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation
From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
18%
Healthcare Company
7%
Transportation Company
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
Qt and Squish are considered to be on the expensive side compared to other software development tools. The pricing is not very flexible, which has been noted as a concern.
See all answers
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version. Upgrading Qt and Squish can be annoying and would be better if Squish were more integrated with Qt, to ease the ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework fo...
See all answers
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
See all answers
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish
Compared 21% of the time
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish
Compared 20% of the time
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish Logo
Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish
Compared 13% of the time
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish Logo
Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish
Compared 9% of the time
Appium vs Qt Squish Logo
Appium vs Qt Squish
Compared 5% of the time
More Qt Squish Competitors
Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 12% of the time
OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 11% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 10% of the time
Testim vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
Testim vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 7% of the time
UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca Logo
UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca
Compared 5% of the time
More Tricentis Tosca Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish
December 2024
Qt Squish reportDownload Qt Squish product report
Buyer's Guide
Tricentis Tosca
November 2024
Tricentis Tosca reportDownload Tricentis Tosca product report
 

Also Known As

froglogic Squish
No data available
 

Learn More

Qt Group
Tricentis
 

Overview

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?
  • Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
  • Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
  • Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
  • Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
  • Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
  • Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts
What benefits should users consider?
  • Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
  • Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
  • Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

 

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Buyer's Guide
Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca
November 2024
Free Report: Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca
Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Qt Squish vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.