Eggplant Test vs Qt Squish comparison

Keysight Technologies and Qt Group are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.7, while Qt Group is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6. Keysight Technologies holds a 3.6% mindshare in TAt, compared to Qt Group’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qt Group users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 17 Eggplant Test reviews

2,871 Views
1,608 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Qt Squish

Read 19 Qt Squish reviews

2,521 Views
1,373 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Qt Squish

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Qt Squish and Eggplant Test are competitive products in the software testing field. Qt Squish is preferred for its pricing, while Eggplant Test is recognized for its comprehensive features, hinting at better long-term value.

Features: Qt Squish is known for its cross-platform support, scripting capabilities in multiple languages like Python and JavaScript, and integration into CI systems. Eggplant Test is distinguished by its AI-driven testing, image and OCR recognition, and system independence.

Room for Improvement: Qt Squish could improve its advanced testing features and AI capabilities. Its deployment can also be streamlined for less overall complexity. Eggplant Test could enhance its ease of use for new users and simplify its deployment process, which may require additional training and resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qt Squish offers a straightforward installation and reliable support, making for an efficient setup. Eggplant Test, although robust in customer service, has a more complex deployment process that may necessitate extra training sessions.

Pricing and ROI: Qt Squish is generally associated with lower initial costs, making it attractive for smaller budgets. Eggplant Test involves higher setup expenses but aims for better ROI through its rich features and enhanced test efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Qt Squish Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Qt Squish

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (10th)

Qt Squish

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 3.6%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Seamless functionality, plug-and-play installation, and highly reliable

There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package. The froglogic Squish solution is only handling GUI regression testing, this is its forte. However, a lot of clients are looking into performance testing associated with it. If a performance testing capability can be added as a part of it, this would bring great value. froglogic Squish has a code coverage solution and they have done a pretty good job on it. The penetration testing could be added as a separate module, this would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"It is easy to set up."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"The solution is a stable one."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"Good text reading ability."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

More Eggplant Test pros

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

Cons

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"There was no free trial in it."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

More Eggplant Test cons

"The price could be better."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It is expensive."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

Eggplant Test is a bit expensive compared to its competitors.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?

Qt and Squish are considered to be on the expensive side compared to other software development tools. The pricing is not very flexible, which has been noted as a concern.

See all answers

What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?

We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version. Upgrading Qt and Squish can be annoying and would be better if Squish were more integrated with Qt, to ease the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?

We use Qt Squish primarily for test automation in our embedded systems. While I configure it and set it up, another person uses it for testing. We also use Squish integrated with Qt, a framework fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 19% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 19% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 20% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Qt Squish

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Qt Squish

Compared 7% of the time

Appium vs Qt Squish

Compared 6% of the time

More Qt Squish Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

January 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Qt Squish

January 2025

Download Qt Squish product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

froglogic Squish

Learn More

Keysight Technologies

Qt Group

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Qt Squish

January 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Qt Squish

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Qt Squish and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Qt Squish report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.