AWS Security Hub vs Trellix ESM comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 in CSPM , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 3.6% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #27 in SIEM , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews

7,401 Views
3,182 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trellix ESM

Read 38 Trellix ESM reviews

2,163 Views
1,947 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

Trellix ESM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Trellix ESM and AWS Security Hub are both prominent digital security solutions with distinct offerings. User reviews suggest that Trellix ESM has the upper hand in comprehensive security features, while AWS Security Hub is favored for its integration within the AWS ecosystem.

Features: Trellix ESM is noted for its robust threat detection, detailed reporting, and in-depth security analytics. AWS Security Hub offers seamless integration with other AWS services, automated compliance checks, and a centralized view of security alerts across AWS accounts.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM could enhance scalability, reduce system complexity, and streamline its interface. AWS Security Hub could benefit from better alert customization, improved support for third-party integrations, and more granular configuration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM deployment is straightforward but can be resource-intensive, with commendable customer service support. AWS Security Hub is generally easier to deploy, benefiting from AWS’s integrated environment and offering extensive documentation. Trellix ESM excels in customer support, while AWS Security Hub is superior in ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM's pricing is slightly higher but justified by its comprehensive feature set and high ROI. AWS Security Hub is more cost-effective, especially for existing AWS users, providing good ROI through its integrated ecosystem. Trellix ESM is viewed as a premium service, while AWS Security Hub offers better cost-effectiveness in an AWS-centric environment.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (15th)

Trellix ESM

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (27th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 3.6%, down 4.5% compared to last year.
Trellix ESM, on the other hand, focuses on Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), holds 1.2% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Security Hub	3.6%
Wiz	15.2%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	9.6%
Other	71.6%

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trellix ESM	1.2%
Splunk Enterprise Security	7.1%
Wazuh	6.4%
Other	85.3%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram

Director at Scybers

Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features

AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.

Read full review

Mohit Dhingra

Senior Vice President IT at AS IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Offers comprehensive report generation while maintaining ease of integration

We need to improve Trellix ESM by making sure that most of the logging devices available in the global market should be covered, and if there is any device which is not covered, there should not be any additional charges for writing the custom parsers on that. We can add some new features regarding AI in the future for Trellix ESM, but the maturity will take a longer time. There are many false positives that happen in an environment during the first couple of months, or around six months, so the system analyst is not able to identify whether the event which has occurred is a true positive or a false positive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I really like the seamless integration with the AWS account structure. It can even be made mandatory as part of the landing zone. These are great features. And there's a single pane of glass for the entire account."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Security Hub is the ability to track when monitoring is not enabled on any of my resources."

"AWS Security Hub brings many features into one table that is quite useful, and the app team finds it easier to see what is missing."

"The advantage is that it is cloud-native, and we do not need to install agents or sensors to find findings."

"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."

"One of the most effective features of AWS Security Hub is the easy access to a dashboard with a ready-to-use security score."

"AWS Security Hub provides comprehensive alerts about potential compliance issues with CIS standards. The integration with third-party tools is another excellent feature. All our workloads are on AWS."

"AWS Security Hub can check your infrastructure against multiple compliance frameworks. You can turn on or off specific frameworks based on your needs."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"The most valuable feature of Trellix ESM, for detecting, is that it detects malware and viruses, such as a particular virus that was critical in Kenya; we used ESM to detect and block that particular virus completely."

"It is user-friendly. The notification part of McAfee ESM is very easy."

"It enables us to detect malicious threats, issues, or vulnerabilities in our network."

"The most valuable feature in ESM is its search and reporting feature. It's really nice."

"It can be easily deployed with the other solutions."

"The most valuable features of McAfee ESM are intrusion detection, malware protection, and the device controller."

"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. Over the years I have always been using this solution and have become comfortable with it."

"The product’s most valuable feature is log monitoring."

More Trellix ESM pros

Cons

"The solution should be easier to learn and use"

"One aspect that could be improved in the solution is its adaptability to different markets and geopolitical restrictions. In certain regions like Thailand, specific services from certain countries or providers, such as AWS or Azure, might be limited or blocked. It also needs improvement in would require configuring the solution more adaptable to AWS infrastructure and function."

"Many findings are too generic or irrelevant to the environment, which can lead to false positives."

"Security Hub is currently not worth investing in, as it requires more configurations and integration with other services to work effectively."

"It's not user-friendly. Too much going on, too many unnecessary findings, not very visual. You can't do much compared to other similar tools that are cheaper and better."

"It is not flexible for multi-cloud environments."

"AWS Security Hub should improve the time it takes to update. It takes a long period of time when updating. It can take 24 hours sometimes to update. Additionally, when integrating this solution with more security tools, takes time."

"We need more granular-level customizations to enable or disable the rules in AWS Security Hub."

More AWS Security Hub cons

"The support from McAfee ESM could improve. They could improve the speed."

"The initial setup is difficult and could improve."

"There are some banking and transactional cases that are local, South America transactions. I would like to see them add features that can be used locally, to make those transactions more reliable."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The only drawback is that they don't have any packet capturing or network behavior analysis."

"The product’s alert response feature needs improvement. It could be more flexible and secure."

"I would like to see good analytics in future releases."

"There's no software support from McAfee."

More Trellix ESM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"The pricing is good, and they are competitive compared to providers such as RSA and IBM QRadar."

"The pricing is fair."

"The licensing cost is based on EPS."

"When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."

"The price of McAfee ESM is higher than some of the other solutions. There are additional features that can be added at an additional fee."

"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"You should buy the distributed option instead of the all-in-one for environments with more than 1000 end points."

"It is an inexpensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?

The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?

When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?

Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentialit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee ESM?

My customer's usual use case for Trellix ESM involves one client, as most of the users have moved to ESM. Nowadays, they don't use IPS only, since McAfee IPS is standalone; they incorporate firewal...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 35% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix ESM

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM

Compared 10% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix ESM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

January 2026

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix ESM

January 2026

Download Trellix ESM product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager

Overview

AWS Security Hub is a comprehensive security service that provides a centralized view of security alerts and compliance status across an AWS environment. It collects data from various AWS services, partner solutions, and AWS Marketplace products to provide a holistic view of security posture. With Security Hub, users can quickly identify and prioritize security issues, automate compliance checks, and streamline remediation efforts.

The service offers a range of features including continuous monitoring, threat intelligence integration, and customizable dashboards. It also provides automated insights and recommendations to help users improve their security posture. Security Hub integrates with other AWS services like Amazon GuardDuty, AWS Config, and AWS Macie to provide a unified security experience. Additionally, it supports integration with third-party security tools through its API, allowing users to leverage their existing security investments.

With its user-friendly interface and powerful capabilities, AWS Security Hub is a valuable tool for organizations looking to enhance their security and compliance posture in the cloud.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM report.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.