AWS Security Hub vs Trellix ESM comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #12 in CSPM , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 2.8% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #30 in SIEM , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

AWS Security Hub

Read 26 AWS Security Hub reviews

9,078 Views
3,904 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trellix ESM

Read 38 Trellix ESM reviews

3,537 Views
3,431 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

AWS Security Hub

Trellix ESM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Trellix ESM and AWS Security Hub are both prominent digital security solutions with distinct offerings. User reviews suggest that Trellix ESM has the upper hand in comprehensive security features, while AWS Security Hub is favored for its integration within the AWS ecosystem.

Features: Trellix ESM is noted for its robust threat detection, detailed reporting, and in-depth security analytics. AWS Security Hub offers seamless integration with other AWS services, automated compliance checks, and a centralized view of security alerts across AWS accounts.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM could enhance scalability, reduce system complexity, and streamline its interface. AWS Security Hub could benefit from better alert customization, improved support for third-party integrations, and more granular configuration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM deployment is straightforward but can be resource-intensive, with commendable customer service support. AWS Security Hub is generally easier to deploy, benefiting from AWS’s integrated environment and offering extensive documentation. Trellix ESM excels in customer support, while AWS Security Hub is superior in ease of deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM's pricing is slightly higher but justified by its comprehensive feature set and high ROI. AWS Security Hub is more cost-effective, especially for existing AWS users, providing good ROI through its integrated ecosystem. Trellix ESM is viewed as a premium service, while AWS Security Hub offers better cost-effectiveness in an AWS-centric environment.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Security Hub

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (7th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (12th)

Trellix ESM

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (30th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. AWS Security Hub is designed for Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) and holds a mindshare of 2.8%, down 4.3% compared to last year.
Trellix ESM, on the other hand, focuses on Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), holds 1.2% mindshare, up 1.0% since last year.

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Security Hub	2.8%
Wiz	11.4%
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks	8.3%
Other	77.5%

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Trellix ESM	1.2%
Splunk Enterprise Security	7.1%
IBM Security QRadar	5.2%
Other	86.5%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Karthik Ekambaram

Director at Scybers

Has helped identify misconfigurations and prioritize risks but lacks multi-cloud support and deeper integration features

AWS Security Hub cannot scale up to multiple different cloud environments; it only works for AWS. There are other products in the market for CSPM that can give you multi-cloud environment misconfigurations, even Microsoft for that matter. Regarding the integration of AWS Security Hub with third-party tools, I am not certain whether we can integrate them, but there is no need to do so. However, AWS Security Hub cannot integrate with other cloud providers, so it only supports the AWS environment. The compliance checks within AWS Security Hub are good, but we don't use them much. We utilize compliance frameworks such as CIS compliance frameworks and ISO 27017 framework, which are beneficial, but it can improve in other areas too, such as including NIST and other frameworks beyond just ISO and CIS. Improvements can be applicable for scalability, particularly on integration with multi-cloud environments, and compliance frameworks can be added for more variety as well. The unified dashboard in AWS Security Hub is adequate; I cannot say it is exceptional, but the content available in the dashboards is satisfactory for now.

Read full review

Mohit Dhingra

Senior Vice President IT at AS IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Offers comprehensive report generation while maintaining ease of integration

We need to improve Trellix ESM by making sure that most of the logging devices available in the global market should be covered, and if there is any device which is not covered, there should not be any additional charges for writing the custom parsers on that. We can add some new features regarding AI in the future for Trellix ESM, but the maturity will take a longer time. There are many false positives that happen in an environment during the first couple of months, or around six months, so the system analyst is not able to identify whether the event which has occurred is a true positive or a false positive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Currently, our organization utilizes AWS for various purposes, including SaaS (Software as a Service), PaaS (Platform as a Service), and hosting applications in the cloud. We develop our applications and use AWS services as a platform for basic functions and secondary development needs. Additionally, we rely on PaaS for accounting services. Approximately, 50% of our applications are hosted in the cloud environment, making it a significant part of our current setup."

"AWS Security Hub brings many features into one table that is quite useful, and the app team finds it easier to see what is missing."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Security Hub is the ability to track when monitoring is not enabled on any of my resources."

"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud."

"The best feature of AWS Security Hub is that you can get compliance or your cloud's current security posture."

"Though I'm still in the initial evaluation phase for AWS Security Hub, I would recommend it to others because it has good features."

"The solution is very good at detection and providing real-time alerts."

More AWS Security Hub pros

"From my perspective, for anyone with a small or medium-sized business, this is the best solution."

"If a customer is specifically looking for log and event analysis, with the correlations, then this solution is a good choice."

"It enables us to detect malicious threats, issues, or vulnerabilities in our network."

"The most valuable features of McAfee ESM are intrusion detection, malware protection, and the device controller."

"Trellix ESM utilizes fewer human resources and improves security and visibility."

"The security can't be compromised, and the security features on offer are the most valuable feature and are why it's really worth having as a product like this in our organization."

"The most valuable feature for us is that it comes with many correlations, reports, and dashboards already available. It's also very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is that if the scanning does find something, it quarantines it."

More Trellix ESM pros

Cons

"Whenever my team gets some alarms from the central team, my team needs to initiate whether it's a real or false trigger. The central team needs to keep adjusting to the parameters or at least the concerned IPs, whether it's really from the company's pool of IPs, so the trigger process can be improved. In the next release of AWS Security Hub, I'd like a better dashboard that could result in better alert visibility."

"The solution will only give you insight if you have configure rule enabled. It should work more like Prisma Cloud and Dome9 which have a better approach."

"I would like a more fine-grained capability for creating custom rules and a more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules, making it quicker and easier."

"Security needs to be measured based on their own criteria. We can't add custom criteria specific to our organization. For example, having an S3 bucket publicly available might be flagged as a critical alert, but it might not be critical in a sandbox environment. So, it gets flagged as critical, which becomes a false positive. So, customization options and creating custom dashboards would be areas for improvement."

"The support must be quicker."

"There is room for improvement in implementing AI capabilities."

"The user interface, graphs, and dashboards of the solution could improve in the future. They are not very sophisticated and could use an update."

More AWS Security Hub cons

"We acquired the IBM product because McAfee is slightly confusing to use, and it's broader."

"We would welcome integrations with some of the new McAfee acquisitions, e.g., behavioural analytics."

"The support from McAfee ESM could improve. They could improve the speed."

"Tech support is required each time there is a system update of the solution."

"The API the product provides still needs to develop some maturity."

"I would like to see fingerprint recognition included in the next release of this solution."

"The initial setup is difficult and could improve."

"It is not a very advanced solution, and it is for very generic use cases. It cannot cope with the advanced requirements that we're going to have. For example, for multiple authentication failures, it is still based on Windows events for detecting multiple login failures, whereas other companies are going beyond and working on implementing two-factor authentication. It is time to correlate the two-factor authentication results with authentification failures, which is not happening with McAfee ESM. The performance of the tool should be improved because it is very slow. The data display on the console is very slow in McAfee ESM. Its data storage is still old-fashioned, and it should be improved and upgraded to the latest versions. They have to come up with some new ideas to match what other leaders in the same domain are doing. For example, in Splunk, when you search for information for the last 60 days or five months, it quickly shows the information, but that is not the case with McAfee. The results should be quicker and faster on the console. They should integrate some additional features such as User Behavior Analytics (UBA) and automation. The threat intelligence part should also be improved on McAfee."

More Trellix ESM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are multiple subscription models, like yearly, monthly, and packaged."

"AWS Security Hub is not an expensive tool. I would consider it to be a cheap solution. AWS Security Hub follows the PAYG pricing model, meaning you will have to pay for whatever you use."

"AWS Security Hub's pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The price of AWS Security Hub is average compared to other solutions."

"Security Hub is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing is fine. It is not an expensive tool."

"The cost is based on the number of compliances, core checks, and services required, and for more than 10,000 recommendations, the charge is just one dollar."

"The price of the solution is not very competitive but it is reasonable."

"The cost is all included. The finance department handles the financial part, and we mostly don't get involved in it."

"Regarding pricing, Trellix ESM is not that expensive. It's less than half the cost of IBM QRadar."

"The price of McAfee ESM is higher than some of the other solutions. There are additional features that can be added at an additional fee."

"The product is slightly expensive."

"McAfee is the right choice for a low-budget solution."

"We pay for our licensing fees on a yearly basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is fair."

"When compared to IBM Security QRadar and other similar platforms, the pricing of McAfee ESM is reasonable and comparatively less expensive."

More Trellix ESM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

Vinod Shankar

Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 26, 2015

HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm

We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

16%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?

We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Security Hub?

The major use case for identifying misconfigurations within the AWS environment focuses on determining whether the administrators have configured everything correctly, giving a better picture of AW...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee ESM?

When discussing Trellix ESM pricing and licensing, if you consider some premium product, the pricing also has to be premium, however, enterprise customers who look for a premium product, alongside ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee ESM?

Areas of Trellix ESM that could be improved or enhanced include checking on the clients who are still on-prem, especially banks, as most are not moving everything to the cloud due to confidentialit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee ESM?

My customer's usual use case for Trellix ESM involves one client, as most of the users have moved to ESM. Nowadays, they don't use IPS only, since McAfee IPS is standalone; they incorporate firewal...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 33% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 7% of the time

Wiz vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs AWS Security Hub

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS Security Hub Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Trellix ESM

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs Trellix ESM

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Trellix ESM

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Trellix ESM

Compared 9% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Trellix ESM

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix ESM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub

May 2026

Download AWS Security Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix ESM

April 2026

Download Trellix ESM product report

Also Known As

SQRRL

McAfee ESM, NitroSecurity, McAfee Enterprise Security Manager

Overview

AWS Security Hub provides multi-account management and compliance checks alongside integrations with AWS services and third-party tools. It centralizes vulnerability tracking and risk prioritization, delivering real-time alerts for proactive security management.

AWS Security Hub enhances cloud security management through a centralized dashboard that monitors infrastructure resources and compliance scores, ensuring adherence to AWS standards. With integrations for vulnerability detection and security posture management, users can streamline security operations. While the platform offers notable benefits, areas for improvement include customization options for findings suppression and integration with multi-cloud environments.

What are the key features of AWS Security Hub?

Multi-Account Management: Seamlessly manage security across numerous accounts.
Compliance Checks: Stay aligned with standards such as PCI through automated reviews.
AWS Integrations: Connect effortlessly with AWS and third-party services to enhance security posture.
Real-Time Alerts: Quickly respond to potential threats with immediate notifications.
Risk Prioritization: Focus on critical vulnerabilities to enhance resource allocation.

What benefits should users expect from using AWS Security Hub?

Proactive Security: Early threat detection enables quicker mitigation strategies.
Cloud-Native Functionality: Utilize tools tailored for cloud environments.
Compliance Insights: Simplified compliance management provides transparency.
Ease of Use: Streamlined interface facilitates efficient security management.

Industries implementing AWS Security Hub leverage its capabilities for comprehensive security across multiple accounts and regions. Health, finance, and retail sectors benefit by automating compliance checks and monitoring security infrastructures. This service aids in identifying misconfigurations, tracking alerts, and ensuring infrastructure integrity during cyber incidents.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Trellix ESM is an innovative tool designed to enhance security management through its seamless integration, user-friendly deployment, customizable dashboards, and robust threat detection capabilities.

Trellix ESM is essential for comprehensive security management, ensuring effective threat detection and analysis. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems and provides advanced correlation and security visualization. Capable of managing logs and monitoring network traffic, it enhances security across diverse environments, making it indispensable for security operations. Despite needing improved SaaS integration, API documentation, and addressing stability issues, it remains crucial for user-friendly deployment and incident analysis. Its benefits are complemented by comprehensive reporting and real-time malware protection.

What Are Trellix ESM's Most Important Features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for insightful data presentation.
Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies security threats.
Security Visualization: Offers robust visual representation of data.
Advanced Correlation: Seamlessly integrates with third-party feeds.
Log and Network Monitoring: Enhances network security effectively.
Intuitive Incident Analysis: Streamlines operational processes.

What Benefits and ROI Should Be Considered?

User-Friendly Integration: Enhances overall user efficiency.
Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers detailed security insights.
Real-Time Malware Protection: Offers immediate threat mitigation.
Streamlined Operations: Optimizes security management processes.

In diverse industries, Trellix ESM is deployed for central log management and security operations, monitoring servers, virtual machines, and hybrid-cloud environments. Companies use it for managed security services and threat detection, analyzing logs and securing data. It finds great use in monitoring network vulnerabilities and event correlation, enabling service providers and MSSPs to effectively manage endpoints and hybrid-cloud setups as well as gather logs from servers and firewalls, offering abundant transparency into security threats and network activities.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com

San Francisco Police Credit Union, Wªstenrot Gruppe, Volusion, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Government of New Brunswick, State of Colorado, Macquarie Telecom, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Cologne Bonn Airport

Buyer's Guide

AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM

October 2024

Free Report: AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Security Hub vs. Trellix ESM report.

We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.