Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct comparison

Axway and IBM are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Axway is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 6.7. Axway holds a 4.3% mindshare in MFT, compared to IBM’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Read 9 Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer reviews

1,213 Views
810 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Sterling Commerce Connect:D...

Read 9 Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct reviews

2,471 Views
1,932 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Sterling Commerce Connect:D...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer and Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct compete in the managed file transfer category. Axway AMPLIFY is noted for its user-friendly features, while Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct shows stronger performance in terms of comprehensive functionality.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is noted for seamless integration, real-time analytics, and a single pane of glass view for tracking transfers. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is recognized for its high performance in large volume transfers, robust security features, and comprehensive customization options.

Room for Improvement: Axway may enhance its security features and scalability options and expand protocol support. Sterling could improve its ease of integration, streamline its deployment model, and reduce costs related to detailed configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axway offers a flexible deployment model suited to diverse IT environments with responsive customer support. Sterling provides a more rigid deployment model but emphasizes technical support to address complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY is attractive for cost-sensitive organizations due to lower initial setup costs and faster ROI. Sterling Connect:Direct involves higher upfront investment but offers long-term value with its comprehensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,881 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File ...

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sterling Commerce Connect:D...

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is 4.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is 8.5%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

PradeepSingh1

Director Of Operations at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Secure application with efficient features for file transfer management

We use the application to transfer and exchange data files between customers and vendors AMPLIFY has all the essential features for managing file transfer. Sometimes, the application's embedded databases couldn't perform well for a higher volume of data. Thus, legacy licensing for these…

Read full review

Sumit Mundik

Application Development Senior Analyst at Accenture

Has good file transfer speed, but licensing cost is too high

The initial setup of the solution is not straightforward because it's not GUI-based. If you are installing the solution on a UNIX server, you should have a basic understanding of UNIX. You should know how to go from one directory to another, what the config files are, how to edit those files, and how to get the backup of those files. You need a little technical knowledge for it. The developers working on the solution are very costly for the organization. Also, the complexity of having this kind of setup is very difficult. This solution is only used by giant financial companies like BNY Mellon, Barclays, and JPMorgan Chase. They cannot replace the solution because they have several files transferred internally using it. It is very difficult and cost-consuming for them to change, migrate, or upgrade their system. That's the reason they are not able to do it very easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides a good amount of storage capacity for a reasonable price and has a good range of connectors."

"The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"It’s very flexible."

"AMPLIFY has all the essential features for managing file transfer."

"It makes a logical link between the inbound/outbound transfer, and makes it clearly visible. This is a very important feature for managing transfer with different environments, and it's very helpful in case of troubleshooting."

"It is an easy-to-use and stable product."

"The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system."

"Axway consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management. Now, all we have to do is open one port to this application, and we can remove all the firewall rules on that port. It's much more straightforward to manage from a security perspective. We used to rely on an archaic FTP solution, but Axway features SFTP, so it was an improvement security-wise."

"The most valuable feature of Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is its flexibility with encryption."

"The Security Plus feature of this solution is excellent, and allows you to send encrypted files very securely to remote destinations."

"The solution's file transfer speed is quite high."

"Security is the most valuable feature of this product."

"Offers secure file transfers with a fast and efficient protocol for very large files."

"The product has been very stable."

"Automation is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides 100% reliability for file transmission. It ensures that files get delivered in a secure manner. When you use Connect:Direct, your file 100% gets delivered to the next delivery location. If the log shows that a file got delivered, it will have all the transmitted data without truncation or other data issues."

More Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct pros

Cons

"The tool can try to make it a little bit more flexible so that we can easily invoke the APIs, and in such a way, it can be made a little bit better."

"The initial setup was quite complex."

"It is complicated to manage multi-operations, particularly in handling file name changes within file transcripts."

"We only hope that they continue to keep updating the solution and improving the offering. They could always do more updates and releases."

"Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement."

"Improvement in Data Encoding would be very appreciated (I'm thinking of ASCII-EBCDIC, ASCII-ASCII, etc.)."

"The areas in need of improvement are the monitoring and the cut-off management, when needed. Today you have at least two solutions: Buy the other Axway suite, Sentinel, or integrate it into your monitoring system."

"Sometimes, the application's embedded databases couldn't perform well for a higher volume of data."

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer cons

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"They have File Agent, which is an additional utility and a component of Connect:Direct, for automated file transmission. In that utility, there is some issue with the file name. There is a limitation on the file name, and that is being fixed by IBM."

"User interface is not user friendly."

"Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct could improve by adding some of the functionality that some other vendors have. For example, GoAnywhere has call agents, which are small clients that can be installed on the endpoints and can be handled by the central point on the server. If I want to do this with the IBM solution, I have to sell a lot of account addresses. The price could be unprofitable for the customer. There is some small functionality that could be implemented and could be easily done to improve this solution."

"This solution cannot be deployed on a root_squash NFS, which limits superuser privileges."

"The initial setup could be simpler and better."

"Technical support is the number one concern."

"The resources required for this tool are costly and not easily available in the market."

More Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite expensive, and because of that, we get good service from them in return for the price paid."

"Pricing and licensing is related to the protocols you choose to support."

"The platform's price aligns with the market."

"AMPLIFY's license is a one-time investment."

"The solution's licensing cost is too high."

"Annual licensing fee."

"The price and licensing of Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,881 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

45%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

The product is simple for encrypting data transfer of all the assets in our system.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

There's infinite pricing available on their portal, however, it's typically accompanied by a discount. However, detailed pricing information is confidential and was not shared in this call.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?

Their monitoring is not up to the mark and needs improvement. They should have enhanced auto-reconnection capabilities for interrupted file transfers and implement features allowing chunk movement ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct?

Automation is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct?

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is an expensive platform.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct?

The package that IBM delivers does not come with many premade tools or templates. This means we have to create a lot of things by ourselves, which requires more work. We have a team of four to five...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 17% of the time

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 17% of the time

MOVEit vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 14% of the time

JSCAPE by Redwood vs Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer

Compared 12% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer Competitors

Kiteworks vs Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

Compared 34% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

Compared 26% of the time

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

Compared 8% of the time

Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT vs Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

Compared 7% of the time

Aspera Managed File Transfer vs Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

Compared 5% of the time

More Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

December 2024

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer report

Download Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer product report

Buyer's Guide

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

January 2025

Download Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct product report

Also Known As

SecureTransport, Axway SecureTransport, AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, AMPLIFY MFT

No data available

Overview

As a multi-protocol MFT gateway, Axway SecureTransport provides the flexibility you need to support virtually any MFT use case. Secure, manage, and track file flows among people and applications inside your enterprise, and beyond your firewall to your user communities, mobile devices, and the cloud. Perform high-volume automated file transfers between systems, sites, lines of business and external partners, to user-driven communications and mobile, folder- and portal-based file sharing.

Axway

IBM's Sterling Connect:Direct is a software product that offers security-hardened, point-to-point file transfers to reduce reliance on insecure File Transfer Protocol (FTP) transmissions. It is designed for high-volume file distribution within and between businesses. The solution guarantees more reliable file movement, from batch integration and movement of large images or catalogs to synchronization with distant sites. Sterling Connect:Direct also enables hybrid cloud deployment through certified containers, allowing for simple and consistent deployment lifecycle management.

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Features

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Performance capabilities such as extraordinary scalability and low latency.

Automated, dependable file transmission that permits unattended, round-the-clock operations.

Designed to run on a variety of operating systems, including Microsoft Windows, UNIX, Linux, IBM z/OS, OpenVMS, i5/OS, and HP NonStop.

Advanced security features with cutting-edge encryption to meet regulatory and industry standards.

IBM certified containers for Sterling Connect:Direct are enterprise-grade, secure product editions that are scalable, secure, easy to install, and manage update and rollback processes. They also have integrated common software services for consistent deployment lifecycle management.
Boosts transfer speed for large files over high-speed networks by up to four times the previous speed while reducing latency.
Gives existing FTP transfers the ability to retry, checkpoint, and compress existing transfers.
Supports a variety of network protocols, including TCP/IP, Systems Network Architecture (SNA), and an optional high-speed add-on based on Aspera FASP technology.

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

High performance: Takes care of your most demanding workloads, including multi-gigabyte files to large volumes of small files.

Reliable file delivery: To help ensure predictable, assured file delivery, it offers automated scheduling, checkpoint restart, and automatic recovery.

Secure transmission of files: Maintains the confidentiality of customer information and supports regulatory compliance measures.

Speed up patching and installation: By deploying your solution with a certified container that contains all necessary components, you can drastically cut installation and patch time from hours to minutes.

Reviews from Real Users

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust file processing and its security for file transfers. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

Michele I., Business Unit Manager at Innovery, writes of the solution, “The file processing is done very well. By default, there are a lot of configurations that can be customized. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct is one of the stronger MFT solutions in the market, it is available in each type of installation, and offers SaaS, PaaS, YaaS, on-premise.”

Camilo M., Pre-sales Engineer at Dell EMC, mentions, “It's a great tool because it offers secure file transfers and it has a fast and efficient protocol for very large files.”

IBM

Sample Customers

BNP Paribas Securities Services, Bollor_, E.ON AG Group, BMW Group, IdenTrust, Gassco, International Post Corporation, SNCF, DB Schenker Logistics, Logius, CSCA, La Poste

HZMO, Bank of Communications

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

January 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,881 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.