Azure Data Factory vs Quest SharePlex comparison

Microsoft and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quest Software is ranked #50. Microsoft holds a 11.1% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Azure Data Factory

Read 85 Azure Data Factory reviews

23,087 Views
18,331 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Quest SharePlex

Read 5 Quest SharePlex reviews

1,967 Views
1,265 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Data Factory

Quest SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Data Factory and Quest SharePlex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. Quest SharePlex Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Quest SharePlex

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Azure Data Factory

Ranking in Data Integration

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Warehouse (3rd)

Quest SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

50th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Azure Data Factory is 11.1%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest SharePlex is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Camilo Velasco

CTO at Sosty

Oct 27, 2022

No deployment cost, quick implementation, pay only for the processing time and data

The primary use case of this solution is to extract ETLS, transform and load data, and organize database synchronization The most valuable feature of this solution is the data flow, which is the same SQL server in important service, integration services, which is a very robust and powerful tool…

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Jun 29, 2022

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Data Factory's best features are connectivity with different tools and focusing data ingestion using pipeline copy data."

"Data Flow and Databricks are going to be extremely valuable services, allowing data solutions to scale as the business grows and new data sources are added."

"Azure Data Factory's most valuable features are the packages and the data transformation that it allows us to do, which is more drag and drop, or a visual interface. So, that eases the entire process."

"I enjoy the ease of use for the backend JSON generator, the deployment solution, and the template management."

"It is easy to integrate."

"The security of the agent that is installed on-premises is very good."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and the readily available adapters for connecting with various sources."

"Data Factory's best features are simplicity and flexibility."

More Azure Data Factory pros

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

Cons

"Azure Data Factory can improve the transformation features. You have to do a lot of transformation activities. This is something that is just not fully covered. Additionally, the integration could improve for other tools, such as Azure Data Catalog."

"Azure Data Factory should be cheaper to move data to a data center abroad for calamities in case of disasters."

"The product integration with advanced coding options could cater to users needing more customization."

"We require Azure Data Factory to be able to connect to Google Analytics."

"Data Factory would be improved if it were a little more configuration-oriented and not so code-oriented and if it had more automated features."

"When working with AWS, we have noticed that the difference between ADF and AWS is that AWS is more customer-focused. They're more responsive compared to any other company. ADF is not as good as AWS, but it should be. If AWS is ten out of ten, ADF is around eight out of ten. I think AWS is easier to understand from the GUI perspective compared to ADF."

"Data Factory could be improved by eliminating the need for a physical data area. We have to extract data using Data Factory, then create a staging database for it with Azure SQL, which is very, very expensive. Another improvement would be lowering the licensing cost."

"User-friendliness and user effectiveness are unquestionably important, and it may be a good option here to improve the user experience. However, I believe that more and more sophisticated monitoring would be beneficial."

More Azure Data Factory cons

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not particularly expensive."

"While I can't specify the actual cost, I believe it is reasonably priced and comparable to similar products."

"Pricing is comparable, it's somewhere in the middle."

"The licensing model for Azure Data Factory is good because you won't have to overpay. Pricing-wise, the solution is a five out of ten. It was not expensive, and it was not cheap."

"The price is fair."

"The solution is cheap."

"Pricing appears to be reasonable in my opinion."

"I would rate Data Factory's pricing nine out of ten."

More Azure Data Factory pricing and cost advice

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?

AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?

Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...

See all answers

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?

Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 14% of the time

Snowflake vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 8% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 7% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs Azure Data Factory

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Data Factory Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 67% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 5% of the time

IBM App Connect vs Quest SharePlex

Compared 4% of the time

More Quest SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory

November 2024

Download Azure Data Factory product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest SharePlex

October 2024

Download Quest SharePlex product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Learn More

Microsoft

Quest Software

Overview

Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

SharePlex database replication empowers your organization to achieve its database goals now and into the future. Make use of built-in monitoring, conflict resolution, data comparison and synchronization capabilities backed by award-winning support.

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

Azure Data Factory vs. Quest SharePlex

October 2024

Free Report: Azure Data Factory vs. Quest SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Quest SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Data Factory vs. Quest SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.