SSIS and Azure Data Factory are competing products in the realm of data integration and transformation. Azure Data Factory seems to have the upper hand due to its cloud-native advantages and flexibility, making it a strong contender despite its higher costs.
Features: SSIS provides powerful ETL capabilities, deep integration with SQL Server, and pre-built components for complex data flows, suitable for on-premises environments. Azure Data Factory supports cloud-native scalability, a wide variety of data sources, and advanced data orchestration with real-time processing.
Room for Improvement: SSIS could enhance its cloud capabilities, simplify its deployment process, and improve scalability. Azure Data Factory might reduce its complexity, offer better cost management options, and enhance its integration with non-Microsoft platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Data Factory offers rapid scalability without the need for physical infrastructure, with robust cloud support from Microsoft. SSIS, being on-premise, can be complex to deploy, requiring significant infrastructure but benefits from direct integration with Microsoft ecosystems.
Pricing and ROI: SSIS is cost-effective for organizations within Microsoft infrastructure with lower setup costs. Its ROI is potentially limited by infrastructure complexity. Azure Data Factory, with higher upfront costs, provides significant ROI through its flexible and scalable cloud capabilities.
Using SSIS has proven cost-effective as there are no additional fees outside the SQL Server license, and it significantly enhances data management efficiency.
The technical support from Microsoft is rated an eight out of ten.
The technical support is responsive and helpful
The technical support for Azure Data Factory is generally acceptable.
Azure Data Factory is highly scalable.
The solution has a high level of stability, roughly a nine out of ten.
It processes large volumes of data quickly.
Incorporating more dedicated API sources to specific services like HubSpot CRM or Salesforce would be beneficial.
There is a problem with the integration with third-party solutions, particularly with SAP.
Sometimes, the compute fails to process data if there is a heavy load suddenly, and it doesn't scale up automatically.
SSIS has a difficult learning curve when dealing with complex transformations.
The pricing is cost-effective.
It is considered cost-effective.
Utilizing SSIS involves no extra charges beyond the SQL Server license.
It connects to different sources out-of-the-box, making integration much easier.
The interface of Azure Data Factory is very usable with a more interactive visual experience, making it easier for people who are not as experienced in coding to work with.
I find the most valuable feature in Azure Data Factory to be its ability to handle large datasets.
One of the best aspects of SSIS is that it is built into Microsoft SQL Server, so there are no additional costs involved.
Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.
SSIS is a versatile tool for data integration tasks like ETL processes, data migration, and real-time data processing. Users appreciate its ease of use, data transformation tools, scheduling capabilities, and extensive connectivity options. It enhances productivity and efficiency within organizations by streamlining data-related processes and improving data quality and consistency.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
