Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BigLeaf vs Cradlepoint NetCloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.7
Users praise Cradlepoint NetCloud's scalability, ease of management, and ability to handle traffic for large-scale, multi-location deployments efficiently.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Cradlepoint NetCloud provides reliable connectivity, easy setup, remote troubleshooting, scalability, robust security, and supports diverse networking needs.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Cradlepoint NetCloud needs better software stability, customer support, simpler installation, and more affordable pricing for small organizations.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Cradlepoint NetCloud's customer service is praised for responsive, knowledgeable support and quick, professional issue resolutions.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Cradlepoint NetCloud is praised for stable performance, robustness in traffic handling, minimal downtime, and seamless, dependable connectivity.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
Cradlepoint NetCloud provides scalable, secure, and flexible connectivity solutions with customizable subscription plans starting around $300 annually.
 

Categories and Ranking

BigLeaf
Ranking in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cradlepoint NetCloud
Ranking in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
15th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Software Defined Networking (SDN) (6th), WAN Edge (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions category, the mindshare of BigLeaf is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cradlepoint NetCloud is 4.2%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions
 

Featured Reviews

Use BigLeaf?
Share your opinion
Robert-Gardner - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy to setup solution, but it is missing useful configuration options
I use this solution to manage Cradlepoint wireless routers It lets us know whether it is online or not, and lets us do a speed test to see how quick the speed is. These are valuable features. They should change some of the configuration settings to enable it to act more as an SD-WAN box to view…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
8%
Construction Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Cradlepoint NetCloud?
It is easy to set up and requires a single administrator to maintain it.
What needs improvement with Cradlepoint NetCloud?
They should change some of the configuration settings to enable it to act more as an SD-WAN box to view the traffic and who's connected to it and what they are doing it.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
City of San Antonio, Statue Cruises, Tour Dubai, St. David's Foundation, JBT, DSC Dredge
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.