BioCatch vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

"It can track mouse movements as well as the actual oriental moments of such as the movement of devices, how they are held, and the angles which at they are held. All these are captured for customers and a behavioral profile is built for the customer over a period of time. This would be matched against any fraudulent behavior. If, for example, suddenly a customer account seems to be accessed by our profile, which is not one particular customer account, if the movements or habits are suspect, we can catch the fraud and shut it down."

"The best features of BioCatch include analyzing how users interact and creating unique profiles for each user, which is what I appreciate most."

"That said, it's very effective in reducing fraud once it's set up."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The security is also very good."

"Presently, the main purpose of SAS is to maintain a centralized platform for all of the verticals — like agriculture, NSME, and home loans — where the bank can monitor everything from one system."

"The solution is very stable; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, and it has been reliable with very good performance so far."

"We experienced some stability issues including API latency, SDK initialization failures, and session ID correlation."

"BioCatch is one of the fraud detection tools which also has machine learning capabilities and it has what is called a machine learning model feature. It is run in the background. The consequence of those machine models is it is complex to perform data functions and the activity and programming techniques. The decision-making for determining what's happening within those models is a little bit complex and not at all transparent. It's not easy for businesses to understand how the model is using the data of the bank customers in order to come to the assumption it does."

"The consequence of those machine models is it is complex to perform data functions and the activity and programming techniques."

"It is a little bit costly."

"Technical support could be much quicker and much more flexible."

"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."

"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."