Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbar vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

SmartBear and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #26, while OpenText is ranked #39. SmartBear holds a 0.7% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Bitbar
Read 3 Bitbar reviews
  • 777 Views
  • 542 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
OpenText Business Processin...
Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews
  • 126 Views
  • 52 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Bitbar are both leaders in software testing automation. Bitbar has the upper hand in advanced features and versatility, making it worth its price, while OpenText offers strong pricing and support.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing provides a tool for validating business processes, enabling exploratory and regression testing. Bitbar offers cloud-based mobile device testing, supporting various environments and APIs, and allows parallel testing, giving it flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText uses an on-premises model with integration capabilities and dedicated support, suiting enterprises needing specific security. Bitbar employs a cloud-based model, allowing quick deployment and scalability with reliable support, offering agility and cloud convenience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText's setup costs are high due to deployment needs but promise a good ROI for large enterprises. Bitbar's flexible pricing with its cloud approach offers quicker ROI by lowering infrastructure costs, making it cost-effective for efficient testing.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bitbar vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing Report (Updated: February 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Bitbar vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing
February 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbar
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
26th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (12th)
OpenText Business Processin...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
39th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Bitbar is 0.7%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1267398 - PeerSpot reviewer
Has the ability to use different frameworks for testing although it is lacking in capability options
Setup depends on how you are using the product. In our case, it was quite simple. We did it ourselves and it didn't take much time, maybe a day. We used one person per team for setup, usually an engineer or developer. For each team, we had one person to assist with deployment. We have multiple teams so each team had someone dealing with setup. We now have two people working in the company who deal with the maintenance of the solution.
Read full review
it_user309363 - PeerSpot reviewer
We use UFT for the scalability and cross-technology diversity, UFT API for the web-service and database related testing, and HP BPT for the modular testing.
We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps. BPT allows you to manage all the test resources and artifacts inside of Quality Center, including all data and test flows, and to have a single point for reporting. To give you an example, we built a series of tests that would firstly fire off web-service calls to ensure the required services were running. We would then do data creation using a series of Excel VB functions (called by UFT through BPT), and then launch into GUI testing of complex webmethods Java web portals to take a business process through a series of screens, capture required data and test screen functionality, write all runtime data back to QC datasets, then call the data later in the BPT test to validate it across database checks using HP UFT API, build and execute SQL queries, and finally validate information for accounting purposes of data sitting on AS400 or payment databases.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."
"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
 

Cons

"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."
"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Insurance Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Bitbar Logo
BrowserStack vs Bitbar
Compared 54% of the time
Sauce Labs vs Bitbar Logo
Sauce Labs vs Bitbar
Compared 46% of the time
More Bitbar Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Mobile App Platforms
April 2025
Bitbar reportDownload Bitbar product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Business Processing Testing
March 2025
OpenText Business Processing Testing reportDownload OpenText Business Processing Testing product report
 

Also Known As

Testdroid
Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
 

Overview

Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.
SmartBear

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
Migros Bank AG
Buyer's Guide
Bitbar vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing
February 2025
Free Report: Bitbar vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bitbar vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.