Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbar vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbar
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
26th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Platforms (13th)
Selenium HQ
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
110
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Bitbar is 0.8%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.4%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

MW
It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not.
It's good that Testdroid are providing more devices to end users so that one who doesn't have a device can use it on the cloud. It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not Device fragmentation was good enough for…
AdityaRanbhare - PeerSpot reviewer
Boosts browser testing efficiency with WebDriver and multi-browser compatibility
The most valuable features of Selenium HQ include WebDriver and the remote framework, which is compatible with Selenium and is mostly helpful for me. Selenium HQ's compatibility with multiple browsers impacts my testing efficiency significantly, as it allows me to run tests on various browsers and generate comparative analysis reports. Selenium automates browsers easily with its web driver, and Selenium IDE facilitates end-to-end testing with its command and control flows.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"There are many useful features in Selenium that I like, and of the new features I particularly enjoy the Selenium Grid. With this, we can run many test cases in one go, and in one suite we can extract multiple results."
"The most valuable features are the ability to test and debug."
"Selenium WebDriver and Selenium IDE are useful."
"What I like best about it is that it can automate everything on the front end with the help of other frameworks. The community worldwide provides support for any issues. Plus, it’s open-source, which is a big advantage."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open source and has multiple languages and browser support. It's very useful."
"Some of the most valuable features of this solution are open-source, they have good support, good community support, and it supports multiple languages whether you use C-Sharp or not. These are some of the most important benefits."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is the ability to create automatic tests that can replicate human behavior."
"Since Selenium HQ has multiple plug-ins, we can use it with multiple tools and multiple languages."
 

Cons

"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"We'd like to see some more image management in future releases."
"When we upgrade the version, some features are missing. I want the product to include some AI capabilities."
"Selenium HQ could have better interaction with SAP products."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"They should add more functionality to the solution."
"There are some synchronization issues"
"I would like to see automatic logs generated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"It's open-source, so it's free."
"This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it."
"The solution is open source."
"Selenium is an open-source product. It is free."
"The pricing is open source."
"I have been using the open-source version."
"Selenium is a free tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
Selenium is easy to install and mostly free, so there's no need for a license. This lack of costs makes it an attractive option.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Testdroid
SeleniumHQ
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbar vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.