Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket Data Center vs JFrog Artifactory comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Data Center
Ranking in Repository Managers
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JFrog Artifactory
Ranking in Repository Managers
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Repository Managers category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Data Center is 2.6%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Artifactory is 37.0%, up from 33.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Repository Managers
 

Featured Reviews

it_user539442 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2017
I like the clustering, smart mirroring and DRP capabilities. Auto-merge is one of the unique features of this SCM.
* Clustering: The ability to run your Bitbucket instance on a cluster of multiple nodes (connected by a high bandwidth, low latency network). This provides scalable capacity, performance, and high availability. This is the top feature since every firm is looking for business resiliency. It is a cluster of nodes connected to a load balancer and single node failure doesn't impact the developer operations. More nodes can be added to, or deleted from, the system without downtime. * Smart mirroring: The ability to provide local READ-only mirror nodes in geographically distributed locations, to accelerate Git clones and fetches for remote teams. This feature really improves performance for geographically distributed teams, where all READ operations happen from local mirror and only WRITE operations require a central remote server. * Disaster recovery: A strategy to resume operations from an alternate data center (usually in another geographic location), in the event of a disaster whereby the main data center becomes unavailable. Failover (to another location) is a fundamental part of disaster recovery.
Matthew Iijima - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 13, 2023
Stores all our artifacts, allows users to manage permissions for their data, and is very stable
We're looking for something that has additional reporting capabilities on data growth and data aging. This goes back to storage lifecycle management so that the actual Artifactory itself can provide these reports to either the administrators or the users. I don't know if it has those capabilities. That's something we have to look into regarding the self-service dashboard, but the tool itself having those capabilities would be great rather than trying to do it at the underlying storage hardware layer. We moved from the internal Derby DB to the Postgres database last year or the year before. Because of the size and amount of objects in our instance, we were probably going to exceed the recommended number of objects for the default Derby DB. So, we moved to Postgres. The other option was MySQL. There weren't a lot of options. It could've been better. I felt that there wasn't a lot of knowledge base or support available to help with that migration for us. We had reached up to Artifactory support to see if they had a professional services type of engagement to do that, and they didn't have anything of that nature. So, we were left to our own devices to manage that database migration.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I am not aware of its cost, but it is worth investing in this. My guess is that its price is not much because we generally prefer open-source solutions, and if we are investing, we don't go for expensive ones. Our selection is based on the market demand and needs, and we invest only if something is worth the cost."
"It is a bit expensive. It could be a little bit lower or have an a la carte option because, in our case, we had to go to the next version of Enterprise X because we needed one feature, which was more than three projects. We don't need all the other capabilities, but we're paying for all those. It's almost twice the cost of the previous version. So, it would be nice to have something along those lines."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Repository Managers solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about JFrog Artifactory?
The core functionality is most valuable for indexing and metadata of all the artifacts, but within the last year or two, we've been using the Projects feature, which has been very helpful. We can n...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog Artifactory?
It is a bit expensive. It could be a little bit lower or have an a la carte option because, in our case, we had to go to the next version of Enterprise X because we needed one feature, which was mo...
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Splunk, Cisco, Ciena, Blackboard, Amadeus
Oracle, Cisco, Cars.com, Riot Games, Google, CA Technologies
Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog Artifactory vs. Sonatype Nexus Repository and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.