OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and BlazeMeter compete in the load testing category. BlazeMeter has the upper hand due to its cloud-based platform and flexibility in scaling load tests, appealing to agile teams and cost-conscious organizations.
Features: LoadRunner Professional supports a wide array of protocols, enabling testing of various applications with sophisticated scripting capabilities. It allows simulation of concurrent users, offering detailed analytics and extensive integration options. BlazeMeter benefits from its cloud-based structure, which simplifies integration with JMeter scripts and supports significant load generation. It provides detailed reporting and easy scalability, which are highly valued by users.
Room for Improvement: LoadRunner's complexity and high cost are significant drawbacks, with users desiring modern protocol support and simpler integration with cloud solutions. BlazeMeter could enhance its integration with APM tools and improve testing granularity. Users also note occasional downtimes and seek more advanced customizations in reports.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner primarily offers on-premises deployment with public cloud options. Users find technical support effective but not immediate. BlazeMeter's cloud-based service allows for hybrid deployments, appealing to agile teams. Its customer support is well-rated for responsiveness and adaptability.
Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner is known for its high cost, justified by its extensive features, but can be prohibitive for small enterprises. Its ROI is bolstered by reliable insights and reduced downtime. BlazeMeter's adaptable pricing and cloud-centric model result in moderated expenses, offering flexibility without compromising functionality.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
The scripting language is quite comfortable for us since we are working with C and C++.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| BlazeMeter | 7.3% |
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 12.1% |
| Other | 80.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
