Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bluehost vs Vercel comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

Bluehost
Ranking in Web Hosting Services
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Vercel
Ranking in Web Hosting Services
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AliRaza4 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 27, 2022
One-click installation, no setup time, excellent support
I give the solution a nine out of ten. We don't use the solution for any other tech stack. For example, we have a Node.js application, we use Linode for now. But if we have WordPress websites, we use Bluehost or Namecheap. Our organization has ten to twelve developers using the solution. The solution is used occasionally in our organization. If you want to install a new website, or you have to make changes or explore files, not on a daily basis. We currently have no plans to increase usage but it all depends on our client's requirements. Comparatively, Bluehost is more expensive than Namecheap and in regards to speed, they are both hosted outside of my region and seem to be the same. I would recommend the solution because it's easy to use and has a one-click installation, and the technical support team is very good at solving your problems.
Rushabh Sinora - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 12, 2024
A SaaS project software that provides the developer tools and cloud infrastructure to build, scale, and secure a faster, more personalized web
Vercel provides hands-on experience they provide for hosting services. Initially, we started with hosting, and I found it impressive that Vercel identifies even minor issues in your project that might prevent your website from being hosted correctly. For example, if there is a small problem in your front end, Vercel will notify you that your site hasn’t been hosted yet and provide the specific file and line number where the issue is occurring. It is definitely an easy tool to use. It provides clear instructions on how to handle everything, even if you're not very familiar with coding. It has a seamless integration with GitHub. We connected our private repository to Vercel, and it directly indicates any issues with the website whenever we commit code. Even if we've done all the changes and committed to the repo, Vercel lets us know about any flaws that would prevent the website from functioning fully. Once the final commit happens, Vercel gives a green tick, indicating no issues. It was a very easy and good experience, with great integration with other tools.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the one-click installation."
"The solution's most valuable features are its response time and performance."
"I think the speed of the tool is good."
"Vercel is easy to use and not as complex as AWS."
"Vercel is easy to use, and it has a flexible user interface."
"I like Vercel the most for its ease of use, especially with Next.js. Its UI is user-friendly, and the solution is easy to learn. I was a beginner when I created my portfolio website with the tool."
"It provides continuous integration and continuous deployment capabilities."
"The tool is easy to use."
"It is pretty stable. I haven't found any bugs."
 

Cons

"The solution's servers are in the US and Europe, and I would like to have additional servers near my region, in the APJ region so my clients don't experience any latency issues."
"If you're not using Edge Functions, Vercel only allows 20 seconds of streaming from the backend. They should allow more time for backend streaming without Edge Functions. This is one thing that Vercel can improve."
"There is room for improvement in terms of error logging. It has some bugs."
"Vercel fails to provide a database to its users, making it in an area where improvements are required."
"I have seen a bottleneck in Vercel regarding socket servers. According to their documentation, Vercel doesn't support WebSocket. While Vercel is great for creating a cloud application, if you need socket operations, the current platform won't accommodate that. I would like the Vercel team to add this feature."
"The product's build time needs enhancement. It currently takes up to four minutes to build my projects for every deployment, which is lengthy."
"Initially, Vercel was great for hosting projects built with frameworks like Next.js or React.js, with NPM or Node.js as the backend. Now, they seem to be expanding into offering templates and ready-made front-end and back-end setups, making it possible to host a website without writing any code. Personally, I don't like this shift because it reduces scalability and the ability to create unique, customized experiences. Code is essential, and moving towards more user-friendly, code-free tools might limit deeper development possibilities."
"If I could add a feature to Vercel to make my life easier, I would add a user journey feature for new users. This would guide them with tips on exploring the platform, showing them the routes for deployment and functions they can use. This way, users can understand all the features without upgrading to premium to see their benefits."
"The tool could have some built-in support for a wide variety of frameworks. I have seen that the tool is majorly biased towards Next.js because it is one of Vercel's products."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is a little more costly than other solutions but their technical support is better."
"It's quite expensive for enterprise use, but it's worth the price."
"For most use cases requiring a small amount of storage, Vercel has a storage cap. Once you exceed that, they charge a nominal amount. I don’t think the storage is insufficient; you can use it for a long time."
"I use the solution's free version."
"Vercel is a bit costlier than other solutions like AWS."
"I'm a free user."
"Vercel is basically free. It's free of cost for new developers."
"If I cross the free version, I have heard from some people that the billing can be expensive."
"As a DevOps person who has to consider the commercial aspects, I find it odd that we must pay $20 per user for each new project under a pro account. That's not what I expected. Additionally, there are charges based on bandwidth usage. We incur additional charges if we go beyond 1 TB or 2 TB. However, we can choose plans based on our specific requirements. So, while the per-project pricing and bandwidth-based charges can add up, we have some flexibility in selecting plans that fit our needs."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Hosting Services solutions are best for your needs.
802,829 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bluehost?
The most valuable feature is the one-click installation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bluehost?
The solution is a little more costly than other solutions but their technical support is better. I rate the solution a seven out of ten for cost.
What needs improvement with Bluehost?
The solution's servers are in the US and Europe, and I would like to have additional servers near my region, in the APJ region so my clients don't experience any latency issues.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vercel?
Vercel offers multiple pricing models, including Individual and Team. Depending on our requirements, we can choose the plan that best suits our needs. The pricing structure seems reasonable.
What needs improvement with Vercel?
If I could add a feature to Vercel to make my life easier, I would add a user journey feature for new users. This would guide them with tips on exploring the platform, showing them the routes for d...
What is your primary use case for Vercel?
I use the solution for the analytics and deployment of my project.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview