Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bluehost vs Vercel comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

Bluehost
Ranking in Web Hosting Services
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Vercel
Ranking in Web Hosting Services
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AliRaza4 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 27, 2022
One-click installation, no setup time, excellent support
I give the solution a nine out of ten. We don't use the solution for any other tech stack. For example, we have a Node.js application, we use Linode for now. But if we have WordPress websites, we use Bluehost or Namecheap. Our organization has ten to twelve developers using the solution. The solution is used occasionally in our organization. If you want to install a new website, or you have to make changes or explore files, not on a daily basis. We currently have no plans to increase usage but it all depends on our client's requirements. Comparatively, Bluehost is more expensive than Namecheap and in regards to speed, they are both hosted outside of my region and seem to be the same. I would recommend the solution because it's easy to use and has a one-click installation, and the technical support team is very good at solving your problems.
Shravan Revanna - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 17, 2024
Enables us to deploy full-stack websites and provides free hosting services
If someone encounters the same issue, solutions are often available online. Using a product with a large user base makes it easier to debug or tackle challenges. They have excellent documentation that helps you get started quickly and easily. You can log in using GitHub, Google, or email, but logging in through GitHub is convenient because it syncs your GitHub repositories with Vercel. Any repository can be imported to Vercel and deployed from there. I recommend checking out their documentation because it is well-written and easy to understand. Plenty of resources are available online, including videos on how to get started with Vercel. People generally find it quite easy to get started and deploy their projects. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the one-click installation."
"Vercel is easy to use and not as complex as AWS."
"The tool is easy to use."
"I think the speed of the tool is good."
"Vercel is easy to use, and it has a flexible user interface."
"It is easy to learn. If you want to deploy your site, it's easy to do."
"I like Vercel because it is very easy to use and deploy. Unlike Firebase, which can be complex to understand, Vercel is straightforward. It also allows you to easily enable analytics, check page speed, and manage SEO meta tags. You can also share the deployment directly. The solution is also beginner-friendly."
"Vercel provides a better user experience and easier deployment than other platforms."
"I like Vercel the most for its ease of use, especially with Next.js. Its UI is user-friendly, and the solution is easy to learn. I was a beginner when I created my portfolio website with the tool."
 

Cons

"The solution's servers are in the US and Europe, and I would like to have additional servers near my region, in the APJ region so my clients don't experience any latency issues."
"If you're not using Edge Functions, Vercel only allows 20 seconds of streaming from the backend. They should allow more time for backend streaming without Edge Functions. This is one thing that Vercel can improve."
"I've been using the solution for a while now, and while I haven't encountered major issues, there is room for improvement. The main problem I've noticed is with the error logs. They often lack information and only indicate that a file is missing without specifying the actual cause of the error. This makes troubleshooting difficult, as running the app locally might show the error in the console, but on Vercel, it just crashes without providing useful details."
"Vercel cannot handle big projects like shopping applications."
"Due to RBI guidelines, we're facing issues with billing in India. Credit card payments often get declined even when we try to pay from the backend. Another problem is paying 20 dollars for each new project, even under one account. This seems odd since we already pay for one project with multiple hosts."
"Initially, Vercel was great for hosting projects built with frameworks like Next.js or React.js, with NPM or Node.js as the backend. Now, they seem to be expanding into offering templates and ready-made front-end and back-end setups, making it possible to host a website without writing any code. Personally, I don't like this shift because it reduces scalability and the ability to create unique, customized experiences. Code is essential, and moving towards more user-friendly, code-free tools might limit deeper development possibilities."
"The product's build time needs enhancement. It currently takes up to four minutes to build my projects for every deployment, which is lengthy."
"There is room for improvement in terms of error logging. It has some bugs."
"I have seen a bottleneck in Vercel regarding socket servers. According to their documentation, Vercel doesn't support WebSocket. While Vercel is great for creating a cloud application, if you need socket operations, the current platform won't accommodate that. I would like the Vercel team to add this feature."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is a little more costly than other solutions but their technical support is better."
"The tool's billing allows 200 deployments per day, but if you want to do more work with the solution, you can opt for the pro plan offered by the tool."
"It's quite expensive for enterprise use, but it's worth the price."
"I'm a free user."
"Vercel is a bit costlier than other solutions like AWS."
"The solution is expensive for React projects."
"If I cross the free version, I have heard from some people that the billing can be expensive."
"Most of the product features are free, which is quite advantageous."
"The solution's pricing depends on the size of the project."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Hosting Services solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bluehost?
The most valuable feature is the one-click installation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bluehost?
The solution is a little more costly than other solutions but their technical support is better. I rate the solution a seven out of ten for cost.
What needs improvement with Bluehost?
The solution's servers are in the US and Europe, and I would like to have additional servers near my region, in the APJ region so my clients don't experience any latency issues.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vercel?
As a DevOps person who has to consider the commercial aspects, I find it odd that we must pay $20 per user for each new project under a pro account. That's not what I expected. Additionally, there ...
What needs improvement with Vercel?
Due to RBI guidelines, we're facing issues with billing in India. Credit card payments often get declined even when we try to pay from the backend. Another problem is paying 20 dollars for each new...
What is your primary use case for Vercel?
I mainly use Vercel for React and Next.js projects. We've done all our web hosting for these projects on Vercel. It's a wonderful platform for hosting web applications built with Next.js and React-...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview