Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bright vs Invicti comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Invicti's customer service is praised for professionalism and promptness, offering effective support through various communication channels and regional partners.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.9
Invicti needs improved efficiency, better authentication, reporting, more database support, and enhancements in UI, documentation, and security features.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Invicti is highly scalable, excelling in handling multiple installations and extensive scans, despite occasional performance slowdowns with large applications.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Invicti offers flexible pricing, competitive for large enterprises, with subscriptions ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 for detailed security insights.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
Invicti is stable and reliable, with minimal issues, except for occasional high resource usage and temporary glitches with large applications.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.4
Invicti offers detailed scanning, customizable checks, and CI/CD integration, emphasizing accuracy and flexibility in web security testing.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bright
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
43rd
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Invicti
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
14th
Ranking in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
API Security (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) category, the mindshare of Bright is 1.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 16.2%, up from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Amr Abdelnaser - PeerSpot reviewer
A safe solution used to detective vulnerabilities for dynamic and complex testing
The Invicti is the scope application tool. The solution is installed on-premise but could be installed as a web version. Starting from the latest version, the web version could be used. They have a web application server. The deployment of the solution involves installing the EXE and configuring your machine.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
55%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?
The inventory prices are very competitive. The competitors are more expensive, but the estimated cost of Invicti is more competitive than that of other tools. They had very good pricing. We have di...
What do you like most about Invicti?
The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.
What needs improvement with Invicti?
Invicti has provided a roadmap outlining the improvements they're focusing on. Given the competition, with tools like Qualys and many others in the market, the interface needs to be enhanced, integ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

NexPloit, NexDast
Netsparker
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Britannica, Shufersal, Qualitest, PremFina, playtech, Phoenix
Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about HCLSoftware , OpenText, Invicti and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.