Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Payment Security vs Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
29th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
9th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub is 5.1%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

it_user432621 - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization.
All 3DS systems assess the risks of all transactions, including closed cards. This drives additional workload for operations. Having said that, CA’s partnership with several authorization providers, such as TSYS, will help us to eradicate this issue. These 3DS secure systems act independently from a bank’s man authorisation system ( Falcon, TSYS, SAS Raptor etc), and as a result they end up in position where they end up attempting to authenticate transactions that are closed card as they have no visibility of these type of statuses. This essentially means that these fraud system generate alerts on closed card , wasting operational resource. This is the same for all systems in this space inc RSA. Having said that there have been recent developments in this space that have allowed authorisation platform to work together with the 3DS system via an API. Meaning that the 3DS system can pass the data to the Authorisation system who in turn will make the decision, instead of the decision being made via a 3DS platform. One example of this is the TSYS/CA relationship.
Luis Inclan - PeerSpot reviewer
A flexible solution with a quick to navigate interface
The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable. I was familiar with the Falcon expert language to write rules, so I had to get used to the new language used in this solution. In the next release, as an additional feature, it will be good to have the capability to sort and play visual effects in the fields. This will help to distinguish each record from the other. For example, we currently have a bar that shows if a person has a high or low score. If the score is 35%, the bar is considered low, and if the score moves to 99%, the bar increases. However, we don't have the capability as interface users to make this function appear in other fields where we want it displayed. We have only the score field, which is pre-configured with this functionality.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"The most valuable feature is its zero degradation model. You don't have to train the model every three to six months, and it automatically functions."
 

Cons

"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"The rule-writing language could be improved to make it more understandable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"The pricing is reasonable. It is not cheap, but it is fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
40%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
ARIC Fraud Hub, ARIC platform
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
TSYS, OpenBet, William Hill, Zapp, Credit Reference Agency, Responsible Gambling Trust, Betfair, kPMG, Camelot
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.