Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Payment Security vs InAuth comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
28th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
InAuth
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
38th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InAuth is 0.5%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

it_user432621 - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization.
All 3DS systems assess the risks of all transactions, including closed cards. This drives additional workload for operations. Having said that, CA’s partnership with several authorization providers, such as TSYS, will help us to eradicate this issue. These 3DS secure systems act independently from a bank’s man authorisation system ( Falcon, TSYS, SAS Raptor etc), and as a result they end up in position where they end up attempting to authenticate transactions that are closed card as they have no visibility of these type of statuses. This essentially means that these fraud system generate alerts on closed card , wasting operational resource. This is the same for all systems in this space inc RSA. Having said that there have been recent developments in this space that have allowed authorisation platform to work together with the 3DS system via an API. Meaning that the 3DS system can pass the data to the Authorisation system who in turn will make the decision, instead of the decision being made via a 3DS platform. One example of this is the TSYS/CA relationship.
WN
Scalable and stable device identification and analysis solution for fraud detection, with reasonable pricing
I don't see anything that needs to be improved in InAuth currently. My advice to others who may want to use this solution is for them to use it with a Samsung device. InAuth works fine. Its features are working. I'm giving InAuth a rating of eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"InAuth is a stable and scalable solution that supports many devices and platforms such as Samsung, LG, etc. It also has very reasonable pricing."
 

Cons

"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"The initial setup for InAuth could be improved, as it's not straightforward. Weak connectivity issues and user-friendliness are also areas for improvement for this solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"Pricing for this solution is reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Bain Capital Ventures
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: April 2025.
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.