Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Payment Security vs SAS Fraud Management comparison

Broadcom and SAS are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. Broadcom is ranked #28, while SAS is ranked #8. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in FDP, compared to SAS’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SAS users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Payment Security
Read 16 Broadcom Payment Security reviews
  • 197 Views
  • 106 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SAS Fraud Management
Read 2 SAS Fraud Management reviews
  • 921 Views
  • 592 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Broadcom Payment Security and SAS Fraud Management are products competing in financial protection. Broadcom has the upper hand in support and competitive pricing, while SAS offers superior features.

Features: Broadcom Payment Security enhances transaction security with advanced threat detection and fraud prevention. It integrates well with existing systems and employs robust data encryption. SAS Fraud Management excels with predictive analytics and real-time detection, offering adaptive learning algorithms and a comprehensive fraud management suite.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom Payment Security enables straightforward deployment and offers accessible customer service for a quick start. SAS Fraud Management requires more complex deployment and customization due to its advanced analytics, but provides excellent customer support to help manage this complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Payment Security is cost-effective with a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio, enabling quick ROI by reducing fraud losses. SAS Fraud Management, while having higher setup costs, offers long-term value with enhanced fraud detection and prevention, which can justify the investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Payment Security vs. SAS Fraud Management Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Payment Security vs. SAS Fraud Management
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
28th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Fraud Management
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Fraud Management is 4.8%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

it_user432621 - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization.
All 3DS systems assess the risks of all transactions, including closed cards. This drives additional workload for operations. Having said that, CA’s partnership with several authorization providers, such as TSYS, will help us to eradicate this issue. These 3DS secure systems act independently from a bank’s man authorisation system ( Falcon, TSYS, SAS Raptor etc), and as a result they end up in position where they end up attempting to authenticate transactions that are closed card as they have no visibility of these type of statuses. This essentially means that these fraud system generate alerts on closed card , wasting operational resource. This is the same for all systems in this space inc RSA. Having said that there have been recent developments in this space that have allowed authorisation platform to work together with the 3DS system via an API. Meaning that the 3DS system can pass the data to the Authorisation system who in turn will make the decision, instead of the decision being made via a 3DS platform. One example of this is the TSYS/CA relationship.
Read full review
AK
Monitor multiple channels with a single platform
Each bank has a lot of different verticals. Before, for each and every vertical, they had to implement a different fraud solution. Presently, the main purpose of SAS is to maintain a centralized platform for all of the verticals — like agriculture, NSME, and home loans. For each and every vertical, they created a centralized platform where the bank can monitor everything from one system. That is the main purpose of SAS Fraud Management. It is a little bit costly. Otherwise, it's pretty good. Suppose you are going to create a data science model or an analytical model. With Python, you have to write long subcodes, but with SAS, you just have to drag and drop those things. If you know all of the logic and all of the theories, then it's a very comfortable tool to use. The security is also very good. That's why most of the industry is adopting SAS. Data security is very good because the Reserve Bank of India has approved it. That said, almost all the banks are now implementing SAS as an all-in-one solution.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"The security is also very good."
"The solution is easy to use."
 

Cons

"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"Occasionally, there are some mechanisms that can work a bit slow."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
"If your company has the budget, I would absolutely recommend SAS."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
34%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security Logo
Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS) vs Broadcom Payment Security
Compared 100% of the time
More Broadcom Payment Security Competitors
FICO Falcon Platform vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
FICO Falcon Platform vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 72% of the time
IBM Safer Payments vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
IBM Safer Payments vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 15% of the time
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 9% of the time
ThreatMetrix vs SAS Fraud Management Logo
ThreatMetrix vs SAS Fraud Management
Compared 5% of the time
More SAS Fraud Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Payment Security
March 2025
Broadcom Payment Security reportDownload Broadcom Payment Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Fraud Detection and Prevention
March 2025
SAS Fraud Management reportDownload SAS Fraud Management product report
 

Also Known As

CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
No data available
 

Overview

Find the balance. Payment Security delivers more secure online transactions with an excellent customer experience.

Card-not-present (CNP) fraud costs billions of dollars annually across the globe. Issuers, processors and merchants need new applications to fight back with security that doesn’t get in the way of business.

Broadcom has the answer. With our industry-leading authentication solutions, you benefit from:

  • The largest global consortium network of real-time transaction data
  • Patented predictive neural network models for highly accurate, real-time decision-making
  • Unsurpassed leadership in EMV 3-D Secure

You maintain full control over your authentication strategy, fraud systems and policies. Simply said, our solutions help you lower your costs and accelerate your business success.

Broadcom

Respond faster to new threats. Reduce false positives for a better customer experience. SAS Fraud Management uses industry-leading data analytics and machine learning to monitor payments and nonmonetary transactions, as well as events, enabling you to identify and respond to unwanted and suspicious behavior in real time.

SAS
 

Sample Customers

Eurocard
Nets
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Payment Security vs. SAS Fraud Management
March 2025
Free Report: Broadcom Payment Security vs. SAS Fraud Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Payment Security vs. SAS Fraud Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Payment Security vs. SAS Fraud Management report.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.