Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs Nastel AutoPilot comparison

Broadcom and meshIQ are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #46 with an average rating of 8.0, while meshIQ is ranked #93. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to meshIQ’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of meshIQ users who would recommend it.
CA App Synthetic Monitor
Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews
  • 309 Views
  • 176 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
Nastel AutoPilot
Read 4 Nastel AutoPilot reviews
  • 142 Views
  • 69 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Nastel AutoPilot and CA App Synthetic Monitor offer robust application performance management solutions, pushing the boundaries of real-time and synthetic monitoring, respectively. Nastel AutoPilot seems to have the upper hand in real-time data integration and support, while CA App Synthetic Monitor is preferred for proactive and comprehensive synthetic transaction monitoring.

What features are offered by Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Nastel AutoPilot users value its real-time analytics, seamless integration with enterprise systems, and predictive problem detection. CA App Synthetic Monitor users appreciate its synthetic monitoring for continuous performance assessment, global monitoring locations, and detailed diagnostics.

What areas of improvement can be found in Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Users suggest that Nastel AutoPilot could improve its initial setup complexity and enhance its alerting mechanisms. For CA App Synthetic Monitor, users recommend expanding its integration capabilities and simplifying its reporting functionalities.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Nastel AutoPilot’s deployment is noted for its complexity but praised for extensive customer support. CA App Synthetic Monitor boasts a more straightforward deployment process, though users note less satisfaction with customer service compared to Nastel AutoPilot.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Nastel AutoPilot in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Nastel AutoPilot users report higher setup costs but commend the long-term ROI benefits. CA App Synthetic Monitor is favored for its competitive pricing model and quicker ROI realization.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Nastel AutoPilot Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Nastel AutoPilot
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,396 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
46th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nastel AutoPilot
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
93rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nastel AutoPilot is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675 - PeerSpot reviewer
A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic
If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.
Read full review
it_user226614 - PeerSpot reviewer
You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM.
Autopilot is a middleware-centric business transaction monitoring tool that includes a Complex Event Processor (CEP) for transaction data. Architecture AutoPilot Probes are lightweight performance measurement and monitoring tools for live applications that are executed at defined points within the…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CA App Synthetic Monitor?
The product comes with expensive annual licenses. The product is very good, very reliable but it costs a lot. Barracuda offers the same kind of services at a lower price.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CA App Synthetic Monitor?
If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CA App Synthetic Monitor?
If you are sending mail or browsing anything, you don't want to send your traffic without encryption. We use SSL for traffic encryption and ASM for SSL offloading. It is a proxy server for SSL. The...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor
Compared 100% of the time
More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
CA App Synthetic Monitor reportDownload CA App Synthetic Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Nastel AutoPilot reportDownload Nastel AutoPilot product report
 

Also Known As

CA ASM
No data available
 

Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Broadcom
Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.
meshIQ
 

Sample Customers

Lexmark
Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation
Buyer's Guide
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Nastel AutoPilot
April 2025
Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Nastel AutoPilot
Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Nastel AutoPilot and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,396 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Nastel AutoPilot report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.