Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Goliath Performance Monitor comparison

Broadcom and Goliath Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #71, while Goliath Technologies is ranked #58. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Goliath Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Goliath Technologies users who would recommend it.
CA Unified Communications M...
Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews
  • 159 Views
  • 118 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
Goliath Performance Monitor
Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews
  • 381 Views
  • 294 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Goliath Performance Monitor are competing in the network monitoring space. CA Unified Communications Monitor seems to have the upper hand in communication-related analytics, while Goliath Performance Monitor leads with troubleshooting features.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor includes real-time monitoring of communication protocols, network performance analytics, and detailed insights. Goliath Performance Monitor offers application performance monitoring, advanced troubleshooting tools, and diagnostic capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve by expanding application monitoring capabilities, enhancing diagnostic tools, and increasing troubleshooting efficiency. Goliath Performance Monitor may work on better integration with communication protocols, refining user interface experience, and optimizing resource usage for larger networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is noted for straightforward implementation and solid customer support, ensuring seamless integration. Goliath Performance Monitor offers seamless deployment with exceptional ongoing support and consultancy services.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides competitive pricing with clear ROI through efficient network monitoring. Goliath Performance Monitor, with a higher initial cost, justifies pricing with comprehensive features and diagnostics, resulting in substantial long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
71st
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), Network Monitoring Software (102nd)
Goliath Performance Monitor
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
58th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features
The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.
Read full review
networke29316 - PeerSpot reviewer
Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive
It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."
"Good end-to-end monitoring"
"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"Offers a diversity of features."
 

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price seems reasonable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Healthcare Company
19%
Computer Software Company
16%
University
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor Logo
ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor
Compared 100% of the time
More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic
April 2025
CA Unified Communications Monitor reportDownload CA Unified Communications Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Goliath Performance Monitor
April 2025
Goliath Performance Monitor reportDownload Goliath Performance Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor
No data available
 

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom
Goliath Performance Monitor offers proactive, end-to-end IT performance monitoring for Citrix & VMware to ensure a positive end user experience. Goliath Performance Monitor provides complete support for monitoring virtual server, virtual desktop and hybrid cloud environments, and provides specialized modules for certain EMR/EHR applications and NVIDIA GRID vGPU. Goliath Performance Monitor has been architected from the ground up to help IT administrators anticipate end user experience issues, troubleshoot the root cause, and deploy remediation actions quickly before end users complain.
Goliath Technologies
 

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass
Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide
Buyer's Guide
CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor
April 2025
Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.