Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Capgemini IBX vs IBM Emptoris comparison

Capgemini and IBM are both solutions in the Procurement Software category. Capgemini is ranked #27, while IBM is ranked #14. Capgemini holds a 0.3% mindshare in PS, compared to IBM’s 0.8% mindshare.
Capgemini IBX
  • 45 Views
  • 29 Comparison Views
IBM Emptoris
  • 142 Views
  • 88 Comparison Views

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Capgemini IBX
Ranking in Procurement Software
27th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Emptoris
Ranking in Procurement Software
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Procurement Software category, the mindshare of Capgemini IBX is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Emptoris is 0.8%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Procurement Software
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

IBX
Emptoris
 

Learn More

Video not available
Capgemini
IBM
 

Overview

Information not available
IBM Emptoris Sourcing is a web-based software application that enables an organization to optimize the process of procurement and provides state-of-the-art capabilities for analyzing and awarding items and services.
 

Sample Customers

Novozymes, Deutsche Post DHL, The Municipality of Trondheim, SEB, Ericsson, Linde Gas, LEGO Group
Mondadori Group, Anheuser-Busch InBev
See our list of best Procurement Software vendors.

We monitor all Procurement Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.