Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Carbonite Recover vs Parsec Labs comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Recover
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
35th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Parsec Labs
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
41st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Carbonite Recover is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parsec Labs is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
 

Featured Reviews

Rias Majeed - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows you to test and schedule recovery tasks for multiple sites
The main weakness of Carbonite Recover is the fallback process, which can be time-consuming. However, the failover process works well when done properly. Similar to other software programs, there was a technical issue involving duplicates and small glitches. Over time, Carbonite recovery has improved. When I started working with Cyber, we had to double-check everything, and although it was challenging, the downtime wasn't extensive—one incident in a year, for example. Restoring data with Carbonite Recover can take time, mainly because the backup process occurs in real time. The main concern is the duration needed to restore data to the primary environment, which can be lengthy. However, once the failover is complete, there are no further issues.
Use Parsec Labs?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Carbonite Recover?
The main weakness of Carbonite Recover is the fallback process, which can be time-consuming. However, the failover process works well when done properly. Similar to other software programs, there w...
What is your primary use case for Carbonite Recover?
Carbonite Recover is an effective tool for testing and scheduling recovery tasks for multiple sites, whether they have primary servers or virtual machines. You can schedule jobs for recovery at the...
What advice do you have for others considering Carbonite Recover?
Carbonite Recover is a downtime reduction solution that minimizes the time employees cannot work. Carbonite Recover can accurately measure how much potential productivity or revenue is saved per ho...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) 2. Microsoft Azure 3. Google Cloud Platform 4. IBM Cloud 5. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 6. Alibaba Cloud 7. DigitalOcean 8. Rackspace 9. Vultr 10. Linode 11. Hetzner Cloud 12. Scaleway 13. UpCloud 14. OVHcloud 15. Kamatera 16. DreamHost 17. Atlantic.Net 18. CloudSigma 19. ProfitBricks 20. Exoscale 21. Cloudways 22. Vultr 23. Packet 24. CloudScale 25. CloudSigma 26. CloudVPS 27. Vultr 28. Scaleway 29. Linode 30. Hetzner Cloud 31. UpCloud 32. OVHcloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: April 2025.
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.