Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CAST Highlight vs Quotium Seeker comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CAST Highlight
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (9th)
Quotium Seeker
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (51st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (48th)
 

Mindshare comparison

CAST Highlight and Quotium Seeker aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. CAST Highlight is designed for Software Composition Analysis (SCA) and holds a mindshare of 1.0%, up 0.8% compared to last year.
Quotium Seeker, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 0.1% mindshare, down 0.1% since last year.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Chris Van Poele - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 30, 2024
Offers efficient portfolio management through enhanced application insights
I have used CAST Highlight in combination with application portfolio management, application lifecycle management, going cloud-ready, and other applications. My main occupation involves software completion analysis and working with various solutions like firewalls and storage One of the…
Use Quotium Seeker?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Basic support is included with the standard licensing feed but it can be upgraded for an additional cost."
"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution."
"CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. However, CAST Highlight is less expensive than the CAST AIP, but it remains too expensive and the professional services from CAST are also too expensive. The high price is part of the problem with the CAST solutions."
"It is a pretty costly tool. A lot of customers are resistant to using it."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
18%
Insurance Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CAST Highlight?
The most valuable features of CAST Highlight are automation and speed.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CAST Highlight?
CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight or nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with CAST Highlight?
The ease of configuration and customization could be improved in CAST Highlight.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Seeker
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wells Fargo, Bank of NY Mellon, Northern Trust, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, BMW, AT&T, US Army, US Air Force, US Navy, John Hancock, Marsh & McLennan, Ernst & Young, PwC, Volkswagen, Boston Consulting Group, London Stock Exchange, Telefonica, Saur France, Total Energies France, SNCF
El Al
Find out what your peers are saying about Black Duck, Veracode, Snyk and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.