Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Celoxis vs Project Objects comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celoxis
Ranking in Project Management Software
19th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Project Objects
Ranking in Project Management Software
73rd
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Celoxis is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Project Objects is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Akos Szirmai - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly scalable tool that offers users the ability to use it for international projects
The most valuable feature of the solution is the functionality that it offers since the performance part is not so critical as you only use it to upload or download documents and create tasks. Celoxis is not used for very high transaction requirements. My company did not face any issues with Celoxis's performance. Celoxis was quite quick, and its functionality was rich, prompting my company to integrate it with many other project management features for which we previously used several other systems. Celoxis replaced and offered a product that was an integration of Excel and Microsoft Project into a single suite.
MF
Responsive support, good third-party integration, and offers hybrid-mode project management
There are a lot of features. The most valuable feature is the ability to implement different scenarios. For example, a big company can implement its next three-year strategy along the two or three main pillars of the approach. Each pillar is composed of several portfolios, and each of those is composed of different projects. When you define the strategy for the next three-year budget, you can analyze the impact of each option. Based on this, you can decide things like assigning more or fewer resources to a project. You can allocate generic resources, like a project manager. Then in the second stage, you can assign names such as who specifically will be in charge of a project. You can do the same thing with all of the human resources that are involved. It provides the capability of integrating with the Agile Scrum component module. There is also integration with third-parties like Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, Check Point, Jira, ServiceNow!, and others. There is the separation between execution from a technical point of view where the staff can work in a classical workflow, Agile, or a hybrid Agile. The project manager and program manager will receive the high-level information needed to keep strict control over the project. You are able to do whatever is needed from the customer's point of view, without coding. Configuring the platform does not require the writing of any code. This is something that is very important. As soon as a new informational structure is created, it will be immediately available for the business intelligence module. This means that you can perform analytics on it. The BI module is very helpful. There is no comparison between it and other BI tools that are available right now. The network uptime is greater than 99%.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Celoxis is scalable in terms of the number of users or the number of projects that the product can handle. Even the storage that is available for a project is scalable in Celoxis."
"Configuring the platform does not require the writing of any code."
 

Cons

"One feature in Celoxis that is quite hard to understand and set up is its access management part."
"A lot of companies are investing heavily in artificial intelligence, so more such features would benefit this product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Though I am unsure, I guess that my company pays around 20 to 25 USD every month for every user."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Celoxis?
Celoxis is scalable in terms of the number of users or the number of projects that the product can handle. Even the storage that is available for a project is scalable in Celoxis.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celoxis?
Though I am unsure, I guess that my company pays around 20 to 25 USD every month for every user.
What needs improvement with Celoxis?
One feature in Celoxis that is quite hard to understand and set up is its access management part. Different user roles can be assigned to various systems with the solution's access management part....
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

KPMG, Thales, LG, HBO, Rolex, Fuji Xerox, Virgin Care, Singapore Post, Visicom, Snow Software, Route 2 Media, Interim Healthcare, eCom, UNCDF
Kells, Co. Meath
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Atlassian, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: March 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.