CentOS and Kali Linux operate in different areas within the Linux ecosystem. CentOS stands out for its performance in server environments, while Kali Linux excels in security tasks.
Features: CentOS features include stability, compatibility with Red Hat, and strong community support. It is ideal for server environments, offering ease of integration and extensive hardware support. Kali Linux caters to security needs with its pre-installed toolkit, providing tools for penetration testing and security analysis.
Room for Improvement: CentOS could enhance scalability, user-friendliness, and security features. Feedback suggests bolstering support options and system updates. Kali Linux could benefit from improved GUI interfaces, easier setup for newcomers, and more AI capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CentOS supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, but relies on community forums for support due to its community-driven nature. Kali Linux focuses on on-premises security deployments, also depending heavily on community resources for support.
Pricing and ROI: Both CentOS and Kali Linux are open-source and offer cost savings. CentOS has optional paid support available through Red Hat, which users appreciate for its cost-effectiveness, while Kali Linux provides significant value with a free, security-feature-rich platform. Enterprise editions may come with licensing options.
We have saved approximately 50% of our revenue by using CentOS.
It saved a lot of time through troubleshooting, which gives us substantial room for improvement in terms of fixing things.
Integrating Kali Linux with DevOps tools has resulted in reduced operational costs due to automated test cases, making it a worthwhile investment with significant returns by decreasing the attack surface area and the frequency of attack incidents.
I have saved time by avoiding the lag I sometimes face on the TryHackMe in-built machine, and I have learned more efficiently.
I would rate the customer support for CentOS a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10.
I would rate the documentation about eight in terms of usefulness.
CentOS's scalability for my organization has handled growth and changing needs smoothly.
I believe CentOS is stable, but we are gradually moving away from it.
CentOS should introduce more security patches to fix different vulnerabilities.
CentOS removed long-term support, and version releases every two to three years are not ideal for production environments because they necessitate frequent updates.
It could be brought back, but that seems unnecessary now that Rocky Linux exists.
If real-time customized port scanning can be added, for example, instead of a default port such as 8080 or 443, if we can use a customized port such as 9876, that capability would be great.
Making Kali Linux more customizable would allow users to personalize it to their style.
Making it more user-friendly and encouraging the use of GUI tools can significantly enhance the overall experience.
There was no cost in terms of deploying it or getting the license for it.
CentOS is a free product with free updates.
Kali Linux is free software, an operating system that's available to download without any cost or licensing fees.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Kali Linux has been positive, as it operates under an open-source model.
We have not faced any CPU utilization alerts, and there have been no downtime reports from CentOS.
Even when a product does not function optimally, the base OS CentOS works smoothly; we can see the status of the services with the command-line interface, making it very efficient.
The best feature CentOS offers is that it's free.
Kali Linux has positively impacted my organization by improving efficiency in penetration testing; its open-source nature permits extensive customization and inclusion of numerous comprehensive pre-installed tools, contributing to a secure network environment with effective monitoring of network applications.
The overall focus on security in Kali Linux is what I find most useful.
Kali Linux has the capability of real-time data scanning for vulnerability assessment for backend services.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
CentOS | 4.5% |
Kali Linux | 3.0% |
Other | 92.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 30 |
Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
Large Enterprise | 25 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 9 |
Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Large Enterprise | 7 |
CentOS offers a stable, secure, and compatible environment with Red Hat packages, providing robust performance and cost efficiency. Its lightweight, scalable design and strong community support make it ideal for handling heavy workloads with limited resources.
CentOS is a popular choice for organizations seeking reliable server and virtualization solutions. Known for its robust stability and security, it offers seamless integration and maintenance. However, after a shift from Red Hat, some challenges emerged, including weak NFS client performance and a more complex interface, which beginners find challenging alongside insufficient documentation. Despite these, CentOS remains a favored option for deploying web applications, server installations, and supporting cloud solutions, thanks to its efficient use in monitoring, databases, and telecommunications.
What are CentOS's key features?CentOS is widely used in industries requiring robust infrastructure, such as web hosting, scientific computing, and telecommunications. In data centers, companies deploy it to support virtual environments, testing, and development. The OS powers business applications, email servers, and cloud solutions, offering a cost-effective alternative to Red Hat.
Kali Linux is widely used by organizations for penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, web application security, network audits, ethical hacking, and open-source intelligence, providing extensive free features.
Organizations run Kali Linux in virtualized environments alongside other operating systems, employing tools for automated scans, malware identification, infrastructure testing, and application development or hosting. These users benefit from lower maintenance requirements and a smaller footprint. The toolset includes Nmap, SQLMap, Metasploit, and Hydra, ensuring effective security assessments. Its high scalability, performance, user-friendly interface, and extensive documentation enhance the platform's usability. Known for stability, flexibility, and virus resistance, Kali Linux supports web security, troubleshooting, and configuration tasks comprehensively.
What are the most important features of Kali Linux?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Kali Linux can support industries in improving security through stable and flexible environments that resist viruses and provide extensive documentation. Users employ it for web security, troubleshooting, and configuring capabilities. Necessary improvements include automation, user-friendliness, and integrating AI and blockchain. Enhancements in security features, faster installations, and better learning tools are also essential. Machine learning integration and non-enterprise user functionalities can address current limitations.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.