Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #50. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 2.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Read 205 Check Point Harmony Endpoint reviews

11,063 Views
7,080 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

2,266 Views
2,039 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Check Point Harmony Endpoint and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Check Point seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration with a broader security ecosystem and advanced threat prevention capabilities.

Features: Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers integration with the broader Check Point security ecosystem, real-time threat intelligence, and threat prevention through SandBlast Agent. It facilitates centralized management, enabling more efficient endpoint security. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is noted for its lightweight design, essential protection functions, and minimal impact on system performance. It provides critical security against unauthorized access and malware without compromising user experience or device efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Check Point Harmony Endpoint could improve integration with third-party solutions and better support for Linux platforms. Enhancing the intuitiveness of its management console and resolving performance issues on less powerful hardware would be beneficial. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection should expand its advanced analytics, improve reporting features, and strengthen its ransomware protection to align with more sophisticated solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Harmony Endpoint supports versatile deployment options including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures, with reliable technical support, though response times could be improved. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection excels in cloud deployments, providing prompt and helpful customer service but requires enhancements for flexible deployment capabilities to match Check Point's versatility.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Harmony Endpoint involves complex licensing models, often seen as pricier but justified by its comprehensive security and management efficiency. Its ROI is visible in time savings and improved management. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is more affordable, with cost-effective options, but may lack Check Point's extensive features. Despite this, both solutions significantly reduce security incidents and management efforts, though Check Point offers an edge in comprehensiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,103 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (6th)

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

50th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is 2.2%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Harmony Endpoint	2.2%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.2%
Other	96.6%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Gerardo Rojas

Support at a security firm with 51-200 employees

Remote Access Security Reinforced with Real-Time Device Protection

Dashboard customization is needed for improvements. While the centralized management is strong, the dashboard could offer more flexibility. It would be helpful to tailor views for different roles, such as IT or security support. Regarding needed improvements, custom report building could be enhanced. Current reports are informative, and a drag-and-drop builder would allow teams to create tailored views for compliance, executive summaries, or operational metrics. For further improvements, enhancing threat simulation and testing would be valuable. Building a threat simulation tool and adding native capabilities to simulate phishing, malware, or ransomware scenarios will help teams validate protection and train users without relying on third-party tools.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a great, cost-effective, and stable security solution to opt for."

"Its most valuable feature is being able to integrate cloud services and centralize the protection policy from a single administration dashboard."

"Check Point Harmony Endpoint has significantly strengthened the defense against malware, ransomware, phishing, and zero-day threats, and the unified agent ensures consistent protection across all endpoints."

"There's the possibility of being able to do the administration from the Check Point portal, maintaining control and visibility of the different security events at all times."

"Since deploying Check Point Harmony Endpoint, I have seen a clear reduction in security incidents, such as phishing and malware infections."

"Before we used this solution, our mail was blacklisted. Now we are white listed by all organizations, including Google. Also the security of our institution has really improved."

"The application runs very fast and does not affect the performance speed of the device where it is installed."

"The centralized management and AI protection of Check Point Harmony Endpoint help us to easily deploy all the endpoints, new endpoints, centrally monitor them, policy enforcement, and everything."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pros

"Low performance requirements."

"The initial setup was straightforward. It took five minutes. I installed the solution myself."

"I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"Doesn't consume resources or affect the computer performance at all."

"It is excellent endpoint protection for mobiles that does everything it says it will."

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."

"I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"Check Point Harmony Endpoint can be improved if it were less resource-intensive because not all of our end-users have laptops with high resources available, such as 16 GB of RAM."

"I see a need for improvement especially in policy management and policy customization with Check Point Harmony Endpoint."

"Technical support can be a bit slow at times."

"As of now, product-wise, we haven't found any major concern that needs to improve, although it does not support full MDM and this is something that should be there."

"It needs more documentation and better ease of deployment. For documentation, it needs more information about integrating the endpoints on SandBlast Agent mobile as well as on desktop platforms."

"I'm not very happy with the support, even in terms of the website. They don't offer much."

"The software requires considerable resources and can strain less powerful computers."

"I would like to be able to see this integration of device analysis and verification - not just in native-integrated solutions - for Linux and iOS mobile devices, which are today a part of the larger group of devices and solutions that we have available."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint cons

"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

"Unified threat management (UTM) integration."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is averagely priced. The product price is neither very high nor too low. The tool is not really expensive."

"Initial monies replacing all AVs with a single product is about £10k."

"The licensing cost for Check Point is $3 USD or $4 USD per end-user."

"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It costs around ₱2,200 per endpoint."

"Check Point Antivirus is the most economical solution."

"In terms of licensing, have a buffer zone around your projects in terms of the amount of endpoints that you want to have. You can always have more, but it is best to leave room for a little increase or growth."

"We pay roughly 80,000 Swedish krona per year. When it comes to the firewall, it's roughly 150,000 Swedish krona yearly. There's also maintenance, of course, which is roughly 10,000 krona per month."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"The solution is very cost-effective."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	133
Midsize Enterprise	70
Large Enterprise	75

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

The platform's most valuable features are the ability to build API, which meets our business requirements, and the VPN client, which provides VPN access from a single client.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

My experience with pricing indicates that the costs have increased compared to last year. Previously, Check Point Harmony Endpoint offered competitive pricing for small user counts such as thirty-f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

Check Point Harmony Endpoint works well overall, but one area I would like to see improved is the reporting and dashboard experience. Sometimes the alerts are clear, but digging into historical dat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 28% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

February 2026

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

January 2026

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

Check Point Endpoint Security, Endpoint Security, Check Point SandBlast Agent, Check Point Antivirus

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides advanced threat prevention with centralized management and seamless integration, safeguarding networks through robust security features and real-time threat detection. It excels at ransomware prevention, encryption protection, and detailed threat analysis.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is renowned for its comprehensive security features, including anti-ransomware capabilities and centralized management. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems, enhancing network protection through features like SandBlast Agent and threat emulation. Organizations benefit from significant incident reductions, utilizing its powerful threat detection, forensics, VPN capabilities, and robust encryption measures. Centralized management during remote work setups and enhanced security through URL filtering and rollback mechanisms further solidify its efficiency. Despite its high resource consumption and configuration challenges, it remains a preferred choice among enterprises aiming to enhance cybersecurity measures.

What Key Features Does Check Point Harmony Endpoint Offer?

Advanced Threat Prevention: Protects against the latest threats with proactive mechanisms.
Anti-Ransomware Capabilities: Prevents and mitigates ransomware attacks efficiently.
SandBlast Agent: Provides seamless firewall integration for enhanced security.
Threat Emulation: Offers an additional layer of security by identifying threats pre-execution.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Enables rapid response through continuous monitoring.

What Benefits Can Users Expect?

Centralized Management: Simplifies control across all endpoints from a single platform.
Enhanced Incident Response: Reduces response time with effective forensic capabilities.
Integration with Existing Systems: Fits well within existing infrastructures for optimum protection.
Improved Ransomware and Malware Defense: Significantly lowers incidents of ransomware attacks.

In sectors such as finance and healthcare, Check Point Harmony Endpoint is crucial for maintaining data security and regulatory compliance. Its features cater to endpoint protection requirements across industries, providing reliable solutions for encryption and cybersecurity challenges. The tool's deployment across diverse environments secures endpoint systems effectively, ensuring uninterrupted operations amid evolving threats.

Check Point Software Technologies

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Boston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

February 2026

Free Report: Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,103 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.