Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

Checkmarx and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while GitHub is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.9. Checkmarx holds a 12.1% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews

24,681 Views
16,235 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 7 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

5,600 Views
4,954 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and GitHub Advanced Security compete in the security management category. While Checkmarx One is noted for its comprehensive security coverage, GitHub Advanced Security has an advantage due to its seamless integration within the development workflow.

Features: Checkmarx One offers extensive security capabilities, robust risk analysis, and management tools. On the other hand, GitHub Advanced Security is known for seamless workflow integration, superior code scanning features, and functionalities that better fit existing processes.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One needs better integration with development environments and improvements to user interface and initial configuration processes. GitHub Advanced Security could enhance its reporting options and extend functionality support but continues to enhance based on feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment but can be challenging during initial setup. GitHub Advanced Security is easily activated within existing GitHub environments. Customer service is reliable for both, with GitHub's being more consistent and accessible.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One provides good value with high security but has higher setup costs. GitHub Advanced Security is worth the price for its integration, offering promising ROI through improved efficiency, despite higher initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.1%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 8.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Sirinat-Paphatsirinatthi

Co-Founder at Cloud NC

Initial setup was very easy, scalable product and stable product

We keep our firewall security in place. Customers use GitHub because they don't want to coordinate with many tools. GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need For customers,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."

"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities. It's one of the key features they provide that's an excellent selling point. They're always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database."

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."

"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."

"Vulnerability details is valuable."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are its integration with multiple SCM solutions and CICD tools, its ability to scale according to user licenses, and the quick scanning process."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

Cons

"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."

"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"We are trying to find out if there is a way to identify the run-time null values. I am analyzing different tools to check if there is any tool that supports run-time null value identification, but I don't think any of the tools in the market currently supports this feature. It would be helpful if Checkmarx can identify and throw an exception for a null value at the run time. It would make things a lot easier if there is a way for Checkmarx to identify nullable fields or hard-coded values in the code. The accessibility for customized Checkmarx rules is currently limited and should be improved. In addition, it would be great if Checkmarx can do static code and dynamic code validation. It does a lot of security-related scanning, and it should also do static code and dynamic code validation. Currently, for security-related validation, we are using Checkmarx, and for static code and dynamic code validation, we are using some other tools. We are spending money on different tools. We can pay a little extra money and use Checkmarx for everything."

"Checkmarx could be improved with more integration with third-party software."

"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"The customizations are a little bit difficult."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"The report limitations are the main issue."

"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"It's relatively expensive."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Advanced Security?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning. Also, support for container stuff, like when the code...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I use it for Azure DevOps, for example. This tool focuses on the security of the code. It performs code analysis to identify security issues, such as hard-coded secrets and passwords, potential SQL...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 47% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Mend.io vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 49% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 26% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 9% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 4% of the time

GitLab vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

January 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

January 2025

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Learn More

Checkmarx

GitHub

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security

January 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.