Checkmarx One vs Invicti comparison

Read 28 Invicti reviews

2,950 Views
1,573 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and Checkmarx One are both key players in the security testing tools category, serving different user preferences. Invicti appears to have the upper hand in terms of pricing and customer service, whereas Checkmarx One is favored for its comprehensive features.

Features: Invicti offers ease of integration, accurate vulnerability scans, and streamlined security assessments. Checkmarx One stands out with static and dynamic application security testing and broader security coverage.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could improve its reporting outputs, scalability, and handling of larger projects. Checkmarx One needs more intuitive navigation, faster analysis times, and could simplify deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Checkmarx One, while more complex to deploy, provides comprehensive support, though response times vary.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti's pricing is considered reasonable, offering a positive ROI. Checkmarx One, although more expensive, delivers substantial returns, justifying its cost with advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Invicti Report (Updated: January 2025).

Checkmarx One vs. Invicti

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Ranking in API Security

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Ranking in API Security

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.1%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

JanetMuhia

Cyber Security Engineer at Spartec

Streamlined our security efforts by allowing us to integrate with tools like Jira

From my experience, Invicti is an exceptionally stable solution for web application security. Here's what stands out: * Consistent Performance: Over the three years we’ve used it, the solution has demonstrated reliable and consistent performance, even during large-scale scanning operations. * Minimal Downtime: I have not encountered significant downtime or disruptions while using Invicti, which is critical for security tools that organizations rely on continuously. * Robust Architecture: Its ability to handle complex scanning tasks without crashes or lag reflects its well-engineered platform. * Regular Updates: Invicti frequently releases updates and patches, which enhance functionality and address any stability concerns proactively. Rating : I would confidently rate Invicti’s stability at 9.5 out of 10. It ensures uninterrupted operations and supports high-performance demands, which are essential for enterprise environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."

"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."

"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."

More Checkmarx One pros

"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."

"The scanner and the result generator are valuable features for us."

"High level of accuracy and quick scanning."

"The platform is stable."

"When we try to manually exploit the vulnerabilities, it often takes time to realize what's going on and what needs to be done."

"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."

"The scanner is light on the network and does not impact the network when scans are running."

"This tool is really fast and the information that they provide on vulnerabilities is pretty good."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"It is an expensive solution."

"Checkmarx could be improved with more integration with third-party software."

"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."

"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."

"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."

"We are trying to find out if there is a way to identify the run-time null values. I am analyzing different tools to check if there is any tool that supports run-time null value identification, but I don't think any of the tools in the market currently supports this feature. It would be helpful if Checkmarx can identify and throw an exception for a null value at the run time. It would make things a lot easier if there is a way for Checkmarx to identify nullable fields or hard-coded values in the code. The accessibility for customized Checkmarx rules is currently limited and should be improved. In addition, it would be great if Checkmarx can do static code and dynamic code validation. It does a lot of security-related scanning, and it should also do static code and dynamic code validation. Currently, for security-related validation, we are using Checkmarx, and for static code and dynamic code validation, we are using some other tools. We are spending money on different tools. We can pay a little extra money and use Checkmarx for everything."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."

"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

"The license could be better. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license. It's a major hindrance that we are facing while scanning applications, and we have to be sure that the URLs are the same and not different so that we do not end up consuming another license for it. Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. The licensing is tied to the URL, and it's restricted. If you have a URL that you scanned once, like a website, you cannot retry that same license. If you are scanning the same website but in a different domain or different URL, you might end up paying for a second license. It would also be better if they provided proper support for multi-factor authentications. In the next release, I would like them to include good multi-factor authentication support."

"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."

"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"OWASP Zap is free and it has live updates, so that's a big plus."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Educational Organization

56%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

What needs improvement with Invicti?

Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 47% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 16% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 16% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx One

Download Checkmarx One product report

Download Invicti product report

Also Known As

No data available

Netsparker

Learn More

Checkmarx

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

Checkmarx One vs. Invicti