Checkmarx One vs Invicti comparison

Read 29 Invicti reviews

2,885 Views
1,530 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Invicti and Checkmarx One are both key players in the security testing tools category, serving different user preferences. Invicti appears to have the upper hand in terms of pricing and customer service, whereas Checkmarx One is favored for its comprehensive features.

Features: Invicti offers ease of integration, accurate vulnerability scans, and streamlined security assessments. Checkmarx One stands out with static and dynamic application security testing and broader security coverage.

Room for Improvement: Invicti could improve its reporting outputs, scalability, and handling of larger projects. Checkmarx One needs more intuitive navigation, faster analysis times, and could simplify deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Checkmarx One, while more complex to deploy, provides comprehensive support, though response times vary.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti's pricing is considered reasonable, offering a positive ROI. Checkmarx One, although more expensive, delivers substantial returns, justifying its cost with advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Invicti Report (Updated: January 2025).

Checkmarx One vs. Invicti

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

3rd

Ranking in API Security

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th)

Invicti

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Ranking in API Security

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 11.5%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Invicti is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Kunal M

Capability Center Leader, ETRM Platforms at Shell

Proactive scanning measures and realistic audit recommendations enhance development focus

Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment. This feature helps us focus on priorities and prioritize the development team's effort, integrating seamlessly with DevOps to facilitate proactive scans of environments. Invicti also provides audit recommendations that are quite realistic, making it easy to discuss plans with developers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."

"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."

"The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."

"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."

"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

"Invicti's proactive scanning measures vulnerabilities each time we deploy or push code to a new environment."

"I would rate the stability as ten out of ten."

"It has very good integration with the CI/CD pipeline."

"Netsparker provides a more interactive interface that is more appealing."

"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."

More Invicti pros

Cons

"The validation process needs to be sped up."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."

"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."

"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."

"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve."

"Invicti takes too long with big applications, and there are issues with the login portal."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"It would be better for listing and attacking Java-based web applications to exploit vulnerabilities."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement."

"The scannings are not sufficiently updated."

"Reporting should be improved. The reporting options should be made better for end-users. Currently, it is possible, but it's not the best. Being able to choose what I want to see in my reports rather than being given prefixed information would make my life easier. I had to depend on the API for getting the content that I wanted. If they could fix the reporting feature to make it more comprehensive and user-friendly, it would help a lot of end-users. Everything else was good about this product."

"The solution needs to make a more specific report."

More Invicti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is costly."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"It's relatively expensive."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"It is competitive in the security market."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Educational Organization

55%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

As a technical user, I do not handle pricing or licensing, but I am aware that Invicti offers flexible licensing models based on organizational needs.

What do you like most about Invicti?

The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan.

What needs improvement with Invicti?

Currently, there is nothing I would like to improve.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 46% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Acunetix vs Invicti

Compared 17% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Invicti

Compared 15% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

Fortify WebInspect vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Product Reports

Download Checkmarx One product report

Checkmarx One

February 2025

Download Invicti product report

February 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Netsparker

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Invicti helps DevSecOps teams automate security tasks and save hundreds of hours each month by identifying web vulnerabilities that matter. Combining dynamic with interactive testing (DAST + IAST) and software composition analysis (SCA), Invicti scans every corner of an app to find what other tools miss with 99.98% accuracy, delivering on the promise of Zero Noise AppSec. Invicti helps discover all web assets — even ones that are lost, forgotten, or created by rogue departments. With an array of out-of-the-box integrations, DevSecOps teams can get ahead of their workloads to hit critical deadlines, improve processes, and communicate more effectively while reducing risk and hitting the ROI goals.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank