Checkmarx One vs ReversingLabs comparison

Checkmarx and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while ReversingLabs is ranked #42. Checkmarx holds a 8.8% mindshare in AS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

22,245 Views
14,237 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

3,683 Views
884 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and ReversingLabs are software solutions competing in the security industry. Checkmarx One is noted for its ease of deployment and customer service, while ReversingLabs is recognized for comprehensive features and higher ROI, suggesting a strong value proposition.

Features: Checkmarx One is known for its code analysis capabilities, integration with developer tools, and security testing features. ReversingLabs stands out with advanced threat detection, flexibility in handling diverse file formats, and an extensive library for file-based risk analysis.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve its threat intelligence capabilities, support for newer programming languages, and automation. ReversingLabs users indicate a need for better documentation, more intuitive navigation, and simplified configuration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, contributing to its user-friendliness. ReversingLabs, while slightly more complex in deployment, is supported by reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One users find the pricing competitive but express concerns about ROI. ReversingLabs is seen as pricier, yet it is favored for its value proposition and positive ROI, indicating more long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,668 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

2nd

Ranking in Container Security

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (1st)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

42nd

Ranking in Container Security

49th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (42nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (25th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (30th), Software Supply Chain Security (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 8.8%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.8%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	8.8%
ReversingLabs	0.8%
Other	90.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

CSOInfor4e0d

CSO - Information Security at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use the product for data enrichment or downloading malicious programs that we are otherwise unable to find

It's integrated in our product. We leverage the API, but it doesn't contribute to increasing the release time of the product itself. While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality. This could be an area where the company can generally improve. It is not a big issue for us, since we have our own development team, but it could be an issue for other companies who are less mature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted the organization, and since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days, saving time and increasing speed to market by reducing the timeline from three or four days to one day only."

"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."

"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."

"The user interface is modern and nice to use."

"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."

"The solution overall is very good at detecting and pinpointing vulnerabilities in the code."

More Checkmarx One pros

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"As far as the availability of the content is generally concerned and the number of malicious programs that can be looked up in the repository, these are very extensive."

"We have complete faith that it can do that for us, and can do it at scale."

"We had nothing in the environment to do such analysis, so it's been a savior in many ways."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

Cons

"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."

"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."

"Meta data is always needed."

"We are trying to find out if there is a way to identify the run-time null values. I am analyzing different tools to check if there is any tool that supports run-time null value identification, but I don't think any of the tools in the market currently supports this feature. It would be helpful if Checkmarx can identify and throw an exception for a null value at the run time. It would make things a lot easier if there is a way for Checkmarx to identify nullable fields or hard-coded values in the code. The accessibility for customized Checkmarx rules is currently limited and should be improved. In addition, it would be great if Checkmarx can do static code and dynamic code validation. It does a lot of security-related scanning, and it should also do static code and dynamic code validation. Currently, for security-related validation, we are using Checkmarx, and for static code and dynamic code validation, we are using some other tools. We are spending money on different tools. We can pay a little extra money and use Checkmarx for everything."

"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

"The stability of Checkmarx could improve. We're having issues with it, and the scan reliability is sometimes impacted so we sometimes have to restart the services to allow scans out of the queue."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmarx?

One way Checkmarx One could be improved is if it could automatically run scans every month after implementation. If it is possible to set it in the SAST portal to scan the repositories automaticall...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 37% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

MetaDefender vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs ReversingLabs

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ReversingLabs

Compared 3% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

May 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

April 2026

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

No data available

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

ReversingLabs delivers a cutting-edge solution for cybersecurity experts, specializing in advanced threat detection and response. It is trusted by industries focused on maintaining high security standards with its innovative use of technology.

ReversingLabs provides comprehensive support for identifying and mitigating threats using a robust intelligence platform. Its unique approach integrates threat detection with automated analysis tools, enhancing organizations' security frameworks. The transparency and depth in tracking files and binaries ensure that users have a clear understanding of potential issues in software and files. With an emphasis on speed and accuracy, it ensures threats are managed before they escalate.

What are the key features of ReversingLabs?

Threat Intelligence Platform: Integrates detailed malware analysis for proactive security measures.
Automated Analysis Tools: Speeds up threat detection and provides in-depth insights.
Comprehensive Data Management: Simplifies complex datasets for enhanced threat recognition.
Open Integration: Smoothly integrates with existing security infrastructures.

What benefits or ROI can users find in ReversingLabs?

Enhanced Security Capabilities: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats before damage occurs.
Efficiency in Detection: Reduces response time through rapid analysis and identification.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes resource allocation by automating the threat management process.
Scalability: Easily expands with growing security needs without added complexity.

ReversingLabs is widely implemented in industries such as finance and healthcare, where data protection is critical. Financial institutions utilize its threat detection to safeguard against data breaches, while healthcare providers rely on it to maintain patient confidentiality and protect sensitive information from cyber threats.

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs

April 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.