Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx One vs ReversingLabs comparison

Checkmarx and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while ReversingLabs is ranked #41. Checkmarx holds a 10.4% mindshare in AS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.
Checkmarx One
Read 71 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 18,550 Views
  • 14,655 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
ReversingLabs
Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews
  • 1,660 Views
  • 349 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and ReversingLabs are software solutions competing in the security industry. Checkmarx One is noted for its ease of deployment and customer service, while ReversingLabs is recognized for comprehensive features and higher ROI, suggesting a strong value proposition.

Features: Checkmarx One is known for its code analysis capabilities, integration with developer tools, and security testing features. ReversingLabs stands out with advanced threat detection, flexibility in handling diverse file formats, and an extensive library for file-based risk analysis.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve its threat intelligence capabilities, support for newer programming languages, and automation. ReversingLabs users indicate a need for better documentation, more intuitive navigation, and simplified configuration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, contributing to its user-friendliness. ReversingLabs, while slightly more complex in deployment, is supported by reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One users find the pricing competitive but express concerns about ROI. ReversingLabs is seen as pricier, yet it is favored for its value proposition and positive ROI, indicating more long-term benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,952 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in Application Security Tools
3rd
Ranking in Container Security
23rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
71
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (22nd), Static Code Analysis (3rd), API Security (6th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (4th), DevSecOps (5th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd)
ReversingLabs
Ranking in Application Security Tools
41st
Ranking in Container Security
48th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Anti-Malware Tools (43rd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (23rd), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (33rd), Software Supply Chain Security (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.4%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Checkmarx One10.4%
ReversingLabs0.4%
Other89.2%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup
In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.
Read full review
Jesse Harris - PeerSpot reviewer
Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats
The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products.  ReversingLabs has a large sample size.  The solution needs to improve integrations.  I have been using the solution for four to five years.  ReversingLabs' stability is excellent.  I rate the…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."
"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."
"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."
"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."
"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."
"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."
More Checkmarx One pros
"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."
"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."
"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."
"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."
"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."
 

Cons

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"Updating and debugging of queries is not very convenient."
"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."
"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."
"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."
"The validation process needs to be sped up."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
More Checkmarx One cons
"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."
"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."
"The solution needs to improve integrations."
"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."
"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."
"The tool's pricing is fine."
"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."
"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."
"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."
"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."
"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."
"It's relatively expensive."
More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice
"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."
"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise38
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One
Compared 45% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 7% of the time
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One Logo
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One
Compared 7% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs Logo
VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs
Compared 20% of the time
JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs Logo
JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs
Compared 12% of the time
IBM X-Force Exchange vs ReversingLabs Logo
IBM X-Force Exchange vs ReversingLabs
Compared 8% of the time
OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs Logo
OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs
Compared 8% of the time
Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs Logo
Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs
Compared 8% of the time
More ReversingLabs Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
October 2025
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
Buyer's Guide
ReversingLabs
September 2025
ReversingLabs reportDownload ReversingLabs product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software
 

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • API security
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
  • Container security
  • IaC security
  • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
  • Codebashing secure code training
  • AI security
  • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
  • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.


https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs
 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs
September 2025
Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Checkmarx One vs. ReversingLabs report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.