Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Checkmarx One vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Checkmarx and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. Checkmarx holds a 12.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.
Checkmarx One
Read 70 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 27,270 Views
  • 17,669 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
Spirent CyberFlood
Read 4 Spirent CyberFlood reviews
  • 164 Views
  • 104 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and Checkmarx One are prominent in the cybersecurity market, with Spirent focusing on network security testing and Checkmarx on application security. Checkmarx One seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, despite Spirent's competitive pricing.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers extensive network testing, detailed traffic generation, and threat simulation. Checkmarx One provides advanced application security with code analysis, vulnerability scanning, and enhanced application testing.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood can improve its reporting, analytics tools, and data presentation. Checkmarx One could enhance integration with third-party tools, streamline scanning processes, and improve system efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood is valued for simplified deployment and responsive customer service. Checkmarx One's setup can be complex, but user support is knowledgeable and helpful.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is noted for affordability and good ROI, making it budget-friendly. Checkmarx One, although more expensive, offers a strong ROI due to its comprehensive feature set.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,636 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Checkmarx One's support is generally rated positively for knowledgeability and quick responses, despite occasional delays and unresolved issues.
No sentiment score available
Spirent CyberFlood's customer service is praised for its local team, providing effective support with a satisfaction rating of 7/10.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.7
Checkmarx One needs better accuracy, language support, integration, flexibility, UI customization, documentation, dynamic testing, and API security features.
Sentiment score
6.5
Spirent CyberFlood needs improved port availability, speed, storage, frequent updates, language options, browser support, and error reporting.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Checkmarx One is favored for its scalability and efficiency, though licensing and resource challenges are sometimes noted.
Sentiment score
5.0
Spirent CyberFlood is viewed as scalable but limited in expandability, reflecting diverse user experiences and satisfaction levels.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.4
Checkmarx One is costly but valued for its robust security, despite complexity in setup and licensing options.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Checkmarx One is stable for most, but large codebase handling can cause crashes, memory issues, and configuration dependence.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.4
Checkmarx One enhances secure coding with user-friendly interface, automation, and multi-language support, making it ideal for developers.
Sentiment score
7.5
Spirent CyberFlood offers a user-friendly traffic generator and flexible network monitoring tools, ideal for adaptable, efficient solutions.
 

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One
Ranking in Application Security Tools
3rd
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (16th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (5th)
Spirent CyberFlood
Ranking in Application Security Tools
35th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
32nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.9%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code
We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.
Read full review
Haider Jarral - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's flexibility
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.
See all answers
What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?
CyberFlood is flexible.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One
Compared 49% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 13% of the time
Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One
Compared 6% of the time
Coverity vs Checkmarx One Logo
Coverity vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
Snyk vs Checkmarx One Logo
Snyk vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 72% of the time
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 28% of the time
More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
November 2024
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
November 2024
Spirent CyberFlood reportDownload Spirent CyberFlood product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
 

Learn More

Checkmarx
Spirent
 

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • API security
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
  • Container security
  • IaC security
  • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
  • Codebashing secure code training
  • AI security
  • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
  • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

 

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Digicel
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood
October 2024
Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Checkmarx One vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.