Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Tempered Airwall comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Identity Services Eng...
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
139
Ranking in other categories
Cisco Security Portfolio (1st)
Tempered Airwall
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) is 29.9%, down from 31.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tempered Airwall is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
 

Featured Reviews

TA
Aug 3, 2023
We can view and control access, but there are a lot of bugs
One of the benefits of ISE for us in our organization is the fact that, because we're a very large entity with employees of over 10,000 people, we have over 2,000 pieces of equipment. So, rather than individual programming or managing everyone's credentials on each piece of equipment, using ISE to manage all of that and giving everybody just one Active Directory login simplifies that process for us. ISE as a platform has been able to free up time, even for me personally, in terms of having to constantly remember credentials, passwords, and all these password complexities. Using ISE to integrate into all of our core infrastructure, frees up so much time for me to do other things. Even down to the configuration, when we are building config for the scripts as well as for our switches and routers, being able to eliminate a lot of those redundant credentials within the configuration itself is a massive time saver for us. In terms of time savings with using ISE itself, we see the savings every day because we have to constantly interact or interface with tons of network equipment. So every single time I have to log into a switch, I am literally realizing I'm saving time in that moment. It's always a constant; I'll say at least three to five minutes for every login. ISE, we use it strictly for authentication and authorization. For consolidation, not so much, because it just serves one dedicated purpose, which is basically that access control. In terms of cybersecurity, I would say ISE helps in a way, but we do have other platforms and tools that are specifically designed for that purpose because we try to choose tools that are very specific in their functions. For us, because we are mostly a Cisco shop, all of our equipment is Cisco. So integrating Cisco ISE into our environment wasn't too complicated, because a lot of our equipment, again, are Cisco-related products. Thus, they were all able to integrate nicely within that ecosystem.
Use Tempered Airwall?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."
"The solution is not that cheap."
"I get very good pricing from Cisco, so I don't have a problem with that. I also don't have a problem with licensing because we get enterprise or global licensing."
"It is fairly expensive and that's part of why we have implemented it in the type of 'hack' that we did, to service multiple clients."
"I believe I have paid around $1,000 in licensing fees. The license is annual."
"Cisco ISE's licensing can get pricey."
"I think licensing costs roughly $2,000 a year. ISE is more expensive than Network Access Control."
"Its price is probably good if you use all of its features and functionalities to protect your environment. If you use only a part of the functionality, its price is too high. It is just a question of value and the functionality you use."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
25%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Aruba Clearpass or Cisco ISE?
Aruba ClearPass is a Network Access Control tool that gives secure network access to multiple device types. You can adapt the policies to VPN access, wired, or wireless access. You can securely ...
What are the main differences between Cisco ISE and Forescout Platform?
OK, so Cisco ISE uses 802.1X to secure switchports against unauthorized access. The drawback of this is that ISE cannot secure the port if a device does not support 802.1x. Cameras, badge readers, ...
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Cisco ISE
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, BC Hydro, Beachbody, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Cisco IT, Derby City Council, Global Banking Customer, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, Houston Methodist, Linz AG, London Hydro, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Molina Healthcare, MST Systems, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Reykjavik University, Wildau University
R&D Lab
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: August 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.