Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) vs Cisco Packet Tracer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)
Ranking in Network Modeling and Simulation
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Packet Tracer
Ranking in Network Modeling and Simulation
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Modeling and Simulation category, the mindshare of Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) is 11.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Packet Tracer is 6.5%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Modeling and Simulation
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2686386 - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers cost-effective labbing for certification preparation through actual node images
Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) could improve by providing more in-depth switch options. For example, I cannot lab stacking at all. Additionally, the accuracy of some solutions like WSA (Web Security Appliance) and ESA ( /products/cisco-secure-email-reviews ) (Email Security ( /categories/email-security ) Appliance), now called SWAN, is not comparable to a production environment.
Use Cisco Packet Tracer?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling and Simulation solutions are best for your needs.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
16%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)?
Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) is very cost-effective at $200 a year, which provides great value compared to buying my own server or setting up a GNS3 ( /products/gns3-reviews ) or EVE-NG ( /products/ev...
What needs improvement with Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)?
Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) could improve by providing more in-depth switch options. For example, I cannot lab stacking at all. Additionally, the accuracy of some solutions like WSA (Web Security App...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Modeling Labs (CML)?
My primary use case for Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) ( /products/cisco-modeling-labs-cml-reviews ) is studying and ramping up on low-level certifications. I use CML to lab for certifications and gener...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation. Updated: April 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.