We performed a comparison between Cleo Integration Cloud Platform and IBM B2B Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of use it provides. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is a straightforward and simple product."
"Out-of-box process orchestration yields quick implementations."
"The most valuable features assist with understanding data formats and transforming data."
"Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."
"The best feature is that many companies use the solution so there is a lot of peer support."
"It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility and the range of EDI standards that IBM Sterling can handle."
"This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications."
"I find the codeless communications, SFTP or FTP, valuable."
"Currently, the solution fails to provide users with additional protocol assistance and API integrations, so the aforementioned areas need to be considered for improvement."
"When working on an elaborate rule, I end up creating it in notepad and then pasting it into the Extended Rule window, which is not convenient."
"IBM B2B Integrator could improve the business process itself, there is no resignation of duties and in terms of the console should be changed in a way that is more user-friendly."
"Patching or upgrading the product is a bit of a nightmare. It would be nice if they removed the installation manager port. We find it complicates upgrading and patching a great deal."
"The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough."
"End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios."
"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly."
"There should be a single place to do things, rather than making it complicated, not moving away and truncating the old features but instead coming up with the new and still keeping the old stuff confuses people sometimes."
"Map translator needs more enhancements."
More Cleo Integration Cloud Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is ranked 13th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while IBM B2B Integrator is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 42 reviews. Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is rated 7.0, while IBM B2B Integrator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cleo Integration Cloud Platform writes "Though the tool reduces the internal hosting cost for businesses, it needs to provide more API integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM B2B Integrator writes "A widely-used, on-premises solution with tons of peer support". Cleo Integration Cloud Platform is most compared with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas IBM B2B Integrator is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, SAP Process Orchestration and IBM Transformation Extender.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
