

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and ClickHouse compete in the database solutions category, with each excelling in different functionalities. MongoDB holds the upper hand in flexibility and developer simplicity, while ClickHouse shines in speed and efficiency for analytical operations.
Features: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is known for its strong scalability to handle large amounts of unstructured data and robust integration features. Its JSON support and extensive documentation also add to its advantages. ClickHouse is designed for high-speed querying and powerful aggregation due to its columnar database format. It excels in real-time processing, making it ideal for analytical tasks.
Room for Improvement: MongoDB users often seek enhanced security features, better BI tool integration, and improved indexing capabilities. There are also concerns about setup complexity and pricing strategies. ClickHouse, on the other hand, needs better documentation, improved third-party integration support, and more intuitive error handling. The complexity of installation and handling frequent small writes are noted as areas needing attention.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced offers versatility in deployment across various environments, with a supportive community. However, technical support experiences are mixed based on subscription levels. ClickHouse comes with a high level of technical support in enterprise settings and operational flexibility, but users face challenges during setup and workflow integration, affecting overall deployment ease.
Pricing and ROI: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced can be expensive for enterprises but offers an open-source community version as a cost-effective alternative. Cloud deployment options offer more affordability. ClickHouse, known for its open-source nature, provides cost-effective solutions for self-hosted setups, although cloud deployments introduce additional costs. Users find ClickHouse’s pricing model flexible and appreciate its cost-effectiveness compared to other analytical databases, with suitable ROI noticed in both products.
I estimate we save four to five hours per person per week due to this efficiency, translating to around 20 to 25 hours saved monthly for each individual.
We could reduce the amount of employees needed when we migrated to ClickHouse Cloud.
With ClickHouse, we didn't need to spend much on resources, cutting costs by around 25 to 30%.
Actually, with MongoDB, it's difficult to calculate the return on investment; it's too expensive for our use.
I would say we see value in money and return on investment with MongoDB Enterprise Advanced.
If more timely support could be provided during critical issues, situations could have been resolved much more quickly, saving considerable time.
When we faced any challenges, the ClickHouse support team provided helpful resolutions.
We utilize AVN ClickHouse, which is effectively managed by AVN, providing bug fixes and developing new functionalities along with architecture reviews.
We have received fairly good support whenever we reached out to the technical teams; they were prompt.
The vertical scalability is impressive, with high insert throughput, allowing millions of rows per second with low latency.
ClickHouse is highly scalable.
The scalability of ClickHouse is great.
In CosmoDB, the scalability is much better than with the MongoDB ReplicaSet models.
MongoDB is highly scalable.
Overall, on a scale of one to ten, I would rate MongoDB an eight; it's mostly because we're still running a monolithic environment on old hardware, so there are some limitations with read-write access.
I can confidently say that it is very consistent and stable even when handling high volume loads and real-time streaming analytics across financial and operational domains.
ClickHouse handles large volumes of data efficiently.
ClickHouse is stable, as we did not encounter stability issues in production.
It's pretty much stable; we have not faced any major challenges or difficulties with MongoDB Enterprise Advanced.
Another challenge is the lack of robust support for transactional databases, which limits its use as a primary database.
ClickHouse should be able to import data from other types of sources like Parquet and Iceberg tables and all the new upcoming data formats.
My experience with ClickHouse's documentation is that it needs improvement; I think it can be made more beginner-friendly, while the community support is really good.
While solutions for other databases like SQL or PostgreSQL already exist, MongoDB requires additional integrations for developing AI solutions.
We have not contracted the security options in our contract because they're too expensive; thus, we implement just encrypted databases and not the security pack.
From the AWS standpoint, if robust integration and data warehouse integration specific tools are added in the advanced suite, that would definitely be helpful.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is very expensive—ClickHouse is the most expensive option.
ClickHouse is open source with no hidden fees, offering cost-effective data management.
I found ClickHouse's pricing to be efficient in comparison to other services such as Redshift.
We use the free version of MongoDB, so there are no licensing costs.
We have to pay approximately 2,000 euros per month for MongoDB.
For a small company, the cost of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is reasonable, but for heavy data usage, we see a little bit of cost pressure but it's acceptable.
ClickHouse has reduced our storage cost and improved our 99th percentile latency by 40%.
For cost optimization, after deploying the cluster on-premises and using S3 Express, approximately 5x cost savings were achieved on data storage.
ClickHouse positively impacted our organization by absorbing the whole logging system without hassle, storing logs for six months efficiently.
It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and add new data points.
In ReplicaSet, it's acceptable, but if your workload needs more performance, and you must pass to a Sharding model, it becomes complicated in MongoDB; in Cosmos DB, however, it's simple.
MongoDB has definitely helped us improve our network monitoring and reporting dashboard.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ClickHouse | 6.6% |
| MongoDB Enterprise Advanced | 5.1% |
| Other | 88.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 35 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
ClickHouse is renowned for its speed, scalability, and real-time query performance. Its compatibility with SQL standards enhances flexibility while enabling integration with popular tools.
ClickHouse leverages a column-based architecture for efficient data compression and real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Kafka and Tableau and is effective in handling large datasets due to its cost-efficient aggregation capabilities. With robust data deduplication and strong community backing, users can access comprehensive documentation and up-to-date functionality. However, improvements in third-party integration, cloud deployment, and handling of SQL syntax differences are noted, impacting ease-of-use and migration from other databases.
What features make ClickHouse outstanding?
What benefits should users consider?
ClickHouse is deployed in sectors like telecommunications for passive monitoring and is beneficial for data analytics, logging Clickstream data, and as an ETL engine. Organizations harness it for machine learning applications when combined with GPT. With the ability to be installed independently, it's an attractive option for avoiding cloud service costs.
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.
The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.
What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.