ClickHouse vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

ClickHouse and Oracle are both solutions in the Open Source Databases category. ClickHouse is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. ClickHouse holds a 3.3% mindshare in OSD, compared to Oracle’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ClickHouse users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

ClickHouse

Read 10 ClickHouse reviews

836 Views
628 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 20 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

265 Views
188 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ClickHouse

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and ClickHouse compete in the cloud database market. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service tends to offer superior customer service and enterprise support, while ClickHouse is favored for high performance.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service has robust enterprise features such as comprehensive security, integration capabilities, and managed backup. ClickHouse offers advanced real-time analytics, high-speed query processing, and efficient column-based database management.

Room for Improvement: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service could improve in performance efficiency and real-time analytics capabilities. It may also benefit from offering more flexible pricing options. ClickHouse needs better enterprise support, easier integration for non-technical users, and enhanced customer service structure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides straightforward deployment with excellent customer service and integration support, facilitating an easy transition for enterprises. ClickHouse offers efficient deployment but often requires specialized expertise, with limited direct customer service, generally relying on community support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comes with a higher setup cost but offers long-term ROI through stability and comprehensive service packages. ClickHouse provides a lower initial investment and rapid ROI in analytic workloads, but setup and optimization could incur additional costs.

To learn more, read our detailed ClickHouse vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ClickHouse

Ranking in Open Source Databases

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (10th)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of ClickHouse is 3.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

ArpitShah

Software Analyst at CLSA

Open-source freedom with efficient data handling and room for documentation growth

A significant area for improvement is the documentation, which is not comprehensive and lacks centralized resources, making it difficult to find information. Additionally, ClickHouse lacks robust support for transactional data, which limits its use as a primary database. My developer experience could be enhanced through better-organized documentation, perhaps by offering a cheat sheet or centralized guide for common setup and usage scenarios.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of ClickHouse is the optimizer because we had too many records to deduplicate, and the optimizer took this task by itself."

"If you have a real-time basis, you should take a look at ClickHouse because it works on a vector database, and the querying is super fast compared to traditional databases."

"The tool is column-based and infinitely scalable."

"ClickHouse is much faster than traditional databases like MySQL and MongoDB. Its column-row searching strategy makes it very efficient. With ClickHouse, we can manage multiple databases, automatically insert data from other databases and delete data as needed. It supports real-time query performance, allowing simultaneous data insertion and retrieval. ClickHouse has improved significantly over the past two years, adding more functions and queries, as well as top functionality."

"ClickHouse is a user-friendly solution that tries to be compatible with SQL standards."

"It's easier to work with big data and calculations using the product."

"The best thing about the tool is that I can set it up on my computer and run queries without depending on the cloud. This is why I use it every day."

"The tool's most valuable feature is a database. It supports portal APIs and offers good flexibility."

More ClickHouse pros

"It is very easy to start working with the product."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

"The product is good for tuning."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"We had a lot of troubles while deploying a whole cluster."

"There are some areas where ClickHouse could improve. Specifically, we encountered incompatibilities with its SQL syntax when migrating queries from MySQL or SQL to ClickHouse. This difference in details made it challenging to figure out the exact issues. Additionally, we faced difficulties due to the lack of a proper Django driver for ClickHouse, unlike MySQL, which Django supports out of the box."

"The aggregation capability is a valuable feature. It's highly efficient, allowing us to review entire transaction histories and user activities in the market. We've tried MongoDB, Postgres, MariaDB, and BigQuery, but ClickHouse is the most cost-efficient solution for collecting data at high speeds with minimal cost. We even used ClickHouse Cloud for a month, and it proved to be a great setup, especially for startups looking to handle big data. For example, if there is a need for 2-4 terabytes of data and around 40 billion rows with reasonable computing speed and latency, ClickHouse is ideal. Regarding the real-time query performance of ClickHouse, when using an API server to query it, I achieved query results in less than twenty milliseconds in some of my experiments with one billion rows. However, it depends on the scenario since ClickHouse has limitations in handling mutations. Additionally, one of ClickHouse's strengths is its compression capability. Our experimental server has only four terabytes, and ClickHouse effectively compresses data, allowing us to store large amounts of data at high speed. This compression efficiency is a significant advantage of using ClickHouse."

"There aren't too many improvements I'd suggest for ClickHouse as it covers all my needs. There are just a few technical issues. For example, sometimes, when you want to get unique values and use certain tables, they don't work as expected. But it's not a major problem."

"I would like ClickHouse to work more on integration with third-party tools."

"Initially, I faced challenges integrating ClickHouse, particularly with inserting data from ActiveMQ, which caused duplicates. However, after adjusting the ClickHouse settings, the issue was resolved and there were no more duplicates."

"ClickHouse has its own concept of database triggers and doesn't support traditional database triggers."

"If you join our team, it should be easy for you to use ClickHouse, especially if you are a developer. However, you need to read the documentation and understand the problems you are trying to solve."

More ClickHouse cons

"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"The user interface is not simple."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is open-source."

"The tool is free."

"We used the free, community version of ClickHouse."

"For pricing, if you use the self-hosted version, it would be free. Cloud services pricing would be an eight out of ten. I try to minimize costs but still have to monitor usage."

"ClickHouse Cloud is not expensive compared to other databases, costing a few dollars per month while providing fast performance."

"ClickHouse has an open-source version, which is free to use and has almost all the features."

"If you have an in-house deployment on Kubernetes or something, it's going to be very cheap since you'll be managing everything."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The product is expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The license is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Open Source Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

27%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Educational Organization

13%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ClickHouse?

ClickHouse is open source without direct fees, unlike other databases that have hidden fees or restrict hosting to their platforms. The open-source nature of ClickHouse allows for complete flexibil...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ClickHouse?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ClickHouse?

The main use case for ClickHouse is as a data warehouse for handling large volumes of data that exceed the capabilities of traditional databases like Postgres. I use it for creating dashboards and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

InfluxDB vs ClickHouse

Compared 20% of the time

OpenSearch vs ClickHouse

Compared 13% of the time

SingleStore vs ClickHouse

Compared 11% of the time

Milvus vs ClickHouse

Compared 10% of the time

Cassandra vs ClickHouse

Compared 9% of the time

More ClickHouse Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 54% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 46% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse

April 2025

Download ClickHouse product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

March 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

ClickHouse is renowned for its speed, scalability, and real-time query performance. Its compatibility with SQL standards enhances flexibility while enabling integration with popular tools.

ClickHouse leverages a column-based architecture for efficient data compression and real-time analytics. It seamlessly integrates with tools like Kafka and Tableau and is effective in handling large datasets due to its cost-efficient aggregation capabilities. With robust data deduplication and strong community backing, users can access comprehensive documentation and up-to-date functionality. However, improvements in third-party integration, cloud deployment, and handling of SQL syntax differences are noted, impacting ease-of-use and migration from other databases.

What features make ClickHouse outstanding?

Speed and Scalability: Enables rapid deployment and scalability, particularly on Kubernetes.
SQL Compatibility: Aligns with SQL standards for flexible database management.
Column-based Structure: Offers efficient data compression and quick query performance.
Integration Support: Works with Kafka, Tableau, and other popular platforms.
Data Deduplication: Manages complex data duplication efficiently.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces expenses while managing large datasets effectively.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides fast data processing for real-time insights.
Flexibility: Offers multiple integration points and compatibility options.
Robust Documentation: Backed by an active development community, ensuring comprehensive support.

ClickHouse is deployed in sectors like telecommunications for passive monitoring and is beneficial for data analytics, logging Clickstream data, and as an ETL engine. Organizations harness it for machine learning applications when combined with GPT. With the ability to be installed independently, it's an attractive option for avoiding cloud service costs.

ClickHouse

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

ClickHouse vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Free Report: ClickHouse vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about ClickHouse vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ClickHouse vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.

We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.