Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudFloorDNS Enterprise DNS vs Infoblox BloxOne DDI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudFloorDNS Enterprise DNS
Ranking in Managed DNS
19th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Infoblox BloxOne DDI
Ranking in Managed DNS
8th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (6th), DDI (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Managed DNS category, the mindshare of CloudFloorDNS Enterprise DNS is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infoblox BloxOne DDI is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed DNS
 

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Sprague - PeerSpot reviewer
Support and communication have been great during setup and implementation
Allocating SRV based on geographical location using GeoDNS. This was primarily for a global VOIP deployment. We also use GeoDNS with A records to distribute different versions of websites according to the country which provides us some regulatory value and more direct marketing. It also allows us…
Raj Metkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Acts as a first line of defense, allows for full utilization of IP addresses in a network and the ability to block unwanted traffic using DNS is powerful
At this stage, we are struggling to use some of the DNS features of the platform, which are more about protecting your domain from hijacking and similar threats. However, I don't think it is a problem with the platform itself. It seems to be more of an integration issue with the secondary DNS provider we are trying to use on the Internet, called Cloudflare. So, it is more of an integration problem between Cloudflare DNS and any public DNS. I would like to improve the integration aspect of these two products. The platform should be able to work seamlessly with any other secondary DNS provider on the Internet. If Infoblox can make their licensing cheaper, then this platform could be widely used because it does cost a fortune to have it. That's why we do not have it in every entity that we manage.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed DNS solutions are best for your needs.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infoblox BloxOne DDI?
Infoblox is fairly expensive for my customers. I am unsure if this is a general comment or specific to my situation. Customers wonder if discounts or promotions are available.
What needs improvement with Infoblox BloxOne DDI?
There is a need for a comprehensive database on DNS. When a new attack occurs, the database requires timely updates. The existing database is updated frequently, but continuous improvements would b...
What is your primary use case for Infoblox BloxOne DDI?
For customers in Indonesia, I have implemented it in BCA, Bank Central Asia, BGP, and Bank Server Banton, mostly in the banking sector. Primarily, I use it for DNS security, particularly to block d...
 

Also Known As

CloudFloorDNS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rhapsody, Napster, Everbridge, Voiply, ZVOX, Tivoli Audio, iModules, VOIP Innovations
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudFloorDNS Enterprise DNS vs. Infoblox BloxOne DDI and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.