Cloudian HyperStore vs IBM Cloud Object Storage comparison

Cloudian and IBM are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Cloudian is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.8. Cloudian holds a 3.0% mindshare in FaOS, compared to IBM’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Cloudian HyperStore

Read 4 Cloudian HyperStore reviews

2,141 Views
1,654 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Object Storage

Read 7 IBM Cloud Object Storage reviews

1,526 Views
980 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cloudian HyperStore

IBM Cloud Object Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Cloudian HyperStore and IBM Cloud Object Storage are competing products in the enterprise-grade storage solutions category. Data comparisons suggest that IBM Cloud Object Storage holds a slight advantage due to its robust features.

Features: Cloudian HyperStore offers a secure, scalable, and cost-effective solution, making it ideal for hybrid cloud integration. Renowned for S3 API interoperability, it supports seamless cloud transitions. IBM Cloud Object Storage excels in data protection, global accessibility, and analytics-driven functionalities, distinguishing itself with advanced data-driven decision-making capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Cloudian HyperStore could enhance its analytics capabilities, broaden its global accessibility, and improve advanced data protection. IBM Cloud Object Storage might streamline its deployment process, offer more straightforward integration in hybrid settings, and consider pricing flexibility for more budget-conscious businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Object Storage provides a flexible deployment model for on-premises and cloud integration, supported by a strong customer service framework. Cloudian HyperStore offers straightforward integration, particularly in hybrid environments, but IBM's comprehensive customer service infrastructure is more attractive for enterprises needing tailored support.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudian HyperStore generally offers lower setup costs, delivering immediate ROI for budget-conscious businesses, with scalability offering long-term savings. IBM Cloud Object Storage requires a higher initial investment but provides significant ROI through feature-rich offerings and enhanced data analytics, often outweighing the initial cost difference with long-term efficiencies and insights.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudian HyperStore vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperStore

Ranking in File and Object Storage

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Cloud Object Storage

Ranking in File and Object Storage

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperStore is 3.0%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Object Storage is 1.4%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna

Senior Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Consultant at Cgi Deutschland KG

A seamless solution offering data encryption, quality service, and security encryption

Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well.

Read full review

Steve Qualls

Senior Storage Engineer at Q & Q IT Consulting

Offers the ease with which you can move data between on-premises storage and the cloud and then retrieve it back on-premises when necessary

IBM Cloud Object Storage supports big data and analytics workflows. However, I usually have to refer to my documentation for that. Cloud environments are part of almost every project I've been involved in over the last few years, but I rely heavily on documentation whenever I need to do anything in the cloud. I know the basics, but the technical details always need refreshing. I create the drawings or diagrams of how the on-premises and cloud environments interact. So, visual representations are helpful. I'll diagram the on-premises environment, the cloud environment, and any appliances in between and then work from there. The integration capabilities simplified our data workflows. Like, the integration itself is pretty easy. The access appliances create the connection between both environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool has S3 capability. Its scalability is excellent. From a security and encryption perspective, the solution supports SSL encryption. It is a seamless solution offering data encryption, quality service, and security encryption."

"The cost was the main reason we chose to use this solution."

"It is very durable and that is particularly important."

"The most valuable features are its scalability and Amazon S3 compatibility because we can move back and forth with a hybrid cloud."

"The integration itself is pretty easy. The access appliances create the connection between both environments."

"The standout feature of IBM Cloud Object Storage is its top-notch security, making it ideal for sensitive applications like mobile financial transactions."

"IBM has the most number of additional services, this is the main advantage."

"The most valuable feature I like is when you connect it via CLI plug-in...It is a stable solution."

"One of Cloud Object Storage's best features is infinite capacity. This is one of the main advantages if you don't want to use your own storage. You also have the ability to write only, write once, and read many. It's like tape storage but software-based. This feature is essential for financial institutions that require that kind of protection if you write backup or data there."

"IBM Cloud Object Storage integrates well."

Cons

"It is a cloud-based environment and at times, it is not very simple to use."

"As it is an S3 solution with the same protocol as the one we have with AWS, having better integration with AWS will be beneficial."

"Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well."

"One improvement could be incorporating a feature similar to Dropbox's version history. This would allow users to track modifications made to files over time, which is particularly important for maintaining a record of changes. While the free version might not include this feature, it could be included in the paid version to provide added value to clients. Additionally, having a version history feature that allows users to access modifications made to files over the past three months could be beneficial."

"The performance could be better. It isn't bad, but everything is network-based, so you have a performance penalty on the network. You can never achieve the same performance as hardware. That's the disadvantage of cloud storage solutions in general. Cloud performance is one of the main issues clients have."

"IBM has limited cloud storage."

"IBM Cloud storage is not cheap, but it could be."

"If I had to choose one area, it would be making the consoles more intuitive would be helpful. Sometimes, they can be a little complicated if you're not familiar with them."

"The performance could improve in IBM Cloud Object Storage. The throughput or objects per second can have degradation."

"One area where IBM Cloud Object Storage could potentially improve is in modernizing its underlying codebase."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our fees are approximately half a dollar per gigabyte."

"The solution is cheap."

"IBM Cloud is cheaper than AWS. If you want to scale your cloud infrastructure, it can be bought at almost the same price."

"You have the option of a monthly or yearly license. Most customers choose the monthly option. I understand what you would like to say. IBM also lets you choose among four types of Cloud Object Storage. The difference is usage, performance, etc. Of course, high-performance storage is more expensive, while low-performance storage is for cold data, and it's really cheap."

"Like most cloud providers, IBM likely charges based on storage capacity, typically per gigabyte or terabyte. Their pricing is competitive when compared to AWS or Microsoft."

"Pricing is not cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

41%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudian HyperStore?

The tool has S3 capability. Its scalability is excellent. From a security and encryption perspective, the solution supports SSL encryption. It is a seamless solution offering data encryption, quali...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperStore?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudian HyperStore?

We use the product to stage timesheets.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Object Storage?

The integration itself is pretty easy. The access appliances create the connection between both environments.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Object Storage?

Like most cloud providers, IBM likely charges based on storage capacity, typically per gigabyte or terabyte. Their pricing is competitive when compared to AWS or Microsoft. I don't believe it's sig...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Object Storage?

All cloud environments have been pretty robust over the last few years. Of course, there's always room for improvement. If I had to choose one area, it would be making the consoles more intuitive w...

See all answers

Comparisons

MinIO vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 26% of the time

Scality RING vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 19% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 13% of the time

Dell ECS vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 9% of the time

NetApp ONTAP vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 2% of the time

More Cloudian HyperStore Competitors

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compared 25% of the time

Dell ECS vs IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compared 21% of the time

MinIO vs IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compared 18% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compared 10% of the time

Scality RING vs IBM Cloud Object Storage

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Cloud Object Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

November 2024

Download Cloudian HyperStore product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Object Storage

December 2024

Download IBM Cloud Object Storage product report

Also Known As

HyperStore, Cloudian HyperStore Object Storage, HyperStore Object Storage

Cleversafe

Learn More

Cloudian

IBM

Overview

Cloudian HyperStore lets you start small and grow to hundreds of petabytes on-premises simply by adding nodes. Leverage the proven interoperability of the industry’s only 100% native S3 API.

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a web-scale platform that stores unstructured data - from petabyte to exabyte - with reliability, security, availability and disaster recovery without replication.

Sample Customers

NTT Communications, Casale, Kumo

Bitly, Dreamstime, Prime Research

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage

December 2024

Free Report: Cloudian HyperStore vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudian HyperStore vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudian HyperStore vs. IBM Cloud Object Storage report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.