Cloudian HyperStore vs NetApp StorageGRID comparison

Cloudian and NetApp are both solutions in the File and Object Storage category. Cloudian is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while NetApp is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Cloudian holds a 3.0% mindshare in FaOS, compared to NetApp’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Cloudian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Cloudian HyperStore

Read 4 Cloudian HyperStore reviews

2,141 Views
1,654 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

NetApp StorageGRID

Read 13 NetApp StorageGRID reviews

3,268 Views
2,621 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cloudian HyperStore

NetApp StorageGRID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Cloudian HyperStore and NetApp StorageGRID are competing in the object storage market. Cloudian HyperStore seems to have the upper hand for businesses focused on cost-effective scalability, while NetApp StorageGRID offers extensive features for higher budget implementations.

Features: Cloudian HyperStore integrates seamlessly, supports hybrid environments, and enables cost-effective scalability, making it a strong choice for growing enterprises. NetApp StorageGRID offers detailed metadata management, efficient tiering, and comprehensive data management features, appealing to organizations with complex data needs.

Room for Improvement: Cloudian HyperStore could enhance data management tools, improve metadata handling, and add more automation features. NetApp StorageGRID can work on simplifying deployment, provide more competitive pricing, and increase the flexibility of its support models to better accommodate smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cloudian HyperStore is known for its adaptable deployment options and straightforward integration process, supported by reliable customer service. In contrast, NetApp StorageGRID requires more intricate setup due to its advanced capabilities but benefits from robust and comprehensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: Cloudian HyperStore offers affordable pricing with a strong focus on ROI, benefiting businesses focused on budget efficiency. NetApp StorageGRID involves a higher initial investment but promises long-term value through its sophisticated features and infrastructure enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Cloudian HyperStore

Ranking in File and Object Storage

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp StorageGRID

Ranking in File and Object Storage

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Cloudian HyperStore is 3.0%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp StorageGRID is 5.4%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File and Object Storage

Featured Reviews

Kiran Rajanna

Senior Solutions Architect and Cloud Security Consultant at Cgi Deutschland KG

A seamless solution offering data encryption, quality service, and security encryption

Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well.

Read full review

Werner Broekhuizen

Presales Consultant at KPN IT Solutions - Trusted Services

Provides seamless data integration and has a reliable technical support team

The platform is highly scalable, allowing easy addition of enclosures and drives, making it non-disruptive and straightforward to expand as needed. It was originally hardware-agnostic, and its integration into NetApp has maintained this scalable nature, allowing for growth without compromising existing infrastructure. Its scalability is around an eight out of ten. It can handle large-scale and unstructured data needs. Its ability to manage significant volumes of data effectively makes it suitable for enterprises requiring robust storage solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool has S3 capability. Its scalability is excellent. From a security and encryption perspective, the solution supports SSL encryption. It is a seamless solution offering data encryption, quality service, and security encryption."

"The cost was the main reason we chose to use this solution."

"The most valuable features are its scalability and Amazon S3 compatibility because we can move back and forth with a hybrid cloud."

"It is very durable and that is particularly important."

"The feature of StorageGRID that I find most valuable for ensuring data durability and protection is its Information Lifecycle Management functionality."

"The most valuable feature is tiering."

"The backup features are valuable. I've heard from our backup and data protection people that our clients are very satisfied with the performance in junction with the backup, which they archive on this type of object storage."

"The speed of the disks removed the bottleneck from our storage."

"Cost-effective and easy to deploy."

"Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple."

"It has improved our operational efficiency through time consumption and logistics by 40 to 50 percent. Everything that had to do with our legacy tape solution has been improved and is now more efficient."

"The technical support is good."

More NetApp StorageGRID pros

Cons

"It is a cloud-based environment and at times, it is not very simple to use."

"As it is an S3 solution with the same protocol as the one we have with AWS, having better integration with AWS will be beneficial."

"Cloudian HyperStore needs to incorporate AI and predictive analysis. It would be helpful if the solution could analyze and predict how to manage data better. The end users should not have access to protected documents. They should be able to drop the documents. The capacity management dashboard can be better. We also want two-factor authentication using Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator as MFA. Hence, the user would access the console not just by logging in with a password and username but with third-party applications as well."

"The price is something that NetApp could improve, as with most companies. NetApp is known for not being the cheapest storage option, which is also valid for StorageGRID. There are other storage options on the market which we are aware of and have done proofs of concept for, but you cannot really compare the list prices because, as a big user of NetApp storages, we have totally different prices than some list prices. Still, the price information we got for other options are almost always less expensive than StorageGRID."

"There was a small amount of confusion when working with StorageGRID and Active Directory for access. We had to do things three to four times resulting in our engineer troubleshooting a couple of things. The location of the menu, along with what is inside the menu: configurations, settings, etc., is not straightforward to users. Most users are Windows-based. So, when make logical changes to the menu which are not similar to Windows, users and administrators get confused."

"The processes around installation and upgrade need improvement."

"I just recommend improving the marketing campaigns in Pakistan."

"The product's continual innovation and enhancement in integration capabilities with other NetApp solutions could be better."

"We want to move towards Azure in the cloud. Right now, the system is all physical."

"It has its quirks here and there, but it is an older NetApp system."

"One key improvement I'd like to see in StorageGRID is enhanced visibility for management purposes."

More NetApp StorageGRID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"Our fees are approximately half a dollar per gigabyte."

"With respect to pricing, it is okay. This product is mid-range."

"We pay for a license annually."

"Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud."

"The pricing of StorageGRID falls within the typical range for enterprise-grade solutions and is comparable to other vendors such as Dell, NetApp, and Pure Storage."

"Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."

"NetApp is not known for being the cheapest storage option on the market. Almost all of the other storage options we looked at were less expensive than StorageGRID. The price is one thing to criticize, which is what we hear internally and from customers as well. They find the cost of the terabytes in this class of storage a little bit higher than expected."

"I rate the product pricing around five out of ten—it's negotiable, depending on the circumstances."

"We chose NetApp because of price and performance."

More NetApp StorageGRID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

33%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudian HyperStore?

The tool has S3 capability. Its scalability is excellent. From a security and encryption perspective, the solution supports SSL encryption. It is a seamless solution offering data encryption, quali...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudian HyperStore?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudian HyperStore?

We use the product to stage timesheets.

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp StorageGRID?

The management portals have most significantly improved our data retrieval times. They've made it much easier to restore data compared to our previous methods.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp StorageGRID?

I rate the product pricing around five out of ten—it's negotiable, depending on the circumstances.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp StorageGRID?

The product's continual innovation and enhancement in integration capabilities with other NetApp solutions could be better.

See all answers

Comparisons

MinIO vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 26% of the time

Scality RING vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 19% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 13% of the time

Dell ECS vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 9% of the time

Qumulo vs Cloudian HyperStore

Compared 5% of the time

More Cloudian HyperStore Competitors

Dell ECS vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 25% of the time

MinIO vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 25% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 23% of the time

Scality RING vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 7% of the time

Hitachi Content Platform vs NetApp StorageGRID

Compared 4% of the time

More NetApp StorageGRID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

File and Object Storage

November 2024

Download Cloudian HyperStore product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp StorageGRID

December 2024

Download NetApp StorageGRID product report

Also Known As

HyperStore, Cloudian HyperStore Object Storage, HyperStore Object Storage

Storage GRID

Learn More

Cloudian

NetApp

Overview

Cloudian HyperStore lets you start small and grow to hundreds of petabytes on-premises simply by adding nodes. Leverage the proven interoperability of the industry’s only 100% native S3 API.

Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media.

Sample Customers

NTT Communications, Casale, Kumo

ASE, DARZ GmbH

Buyer's Guide

Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID

December 2024

Free Report: Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.