CloudStack vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

Apache and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0. Apache holds a 2.2% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

3,384 Views
3,249 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 10 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

3,795 Views
2,201 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CloudStack

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudStack and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are competing products in cloud infrastructure and management. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has an edge with its advanced analytics and cloud optimization capabilities appealing to large enterprises.

Features: CloudStack offers robust cloud orchestration, scalability, and broad API support. It integrates with multiple hypervisors, supporting a flexible cloud solution. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides real-time analytics, cost optimization, and detailed multi-cloud management reporting.

Room for Improvement: CloudStack could enhance its analytics and reporting features and improve documentation for better user support. It may also benefit from expanding integration with third-party applications. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could simplify its deployment process and further refine its user interface for ease of use, along with offering more flexible pricing options to cater to diverse businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudStack is straightforward to deploy with a simple architecture, supported by an active community. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, while complex, is backed by detailed documentation and responsive customer service, assisting those with complicated multi-cloud setups.

Pricing and ROI: CloudStack is cost-effective and provides quick ROI due to its open-source nature with lower initial costs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth involves higher upfront expenses but offers long-term savings through sophisticated cost management and cloud optimization, presenting better ROI for those seeking advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,067 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudStack	2.2%
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	1.8%
Other	96.0%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

Cláudio Braga

AI Software Developer Engineer at IBM

Improves cloud cost control and accountability but could explore further enhancements

The most valuable features of this solution include the drive for accountability because we can allocate cloud costs back to specific business units or teams through showback and chargeback. Additionally, reduced waste is achieved because we can identify unused or underutilized resources and receive recommendations for resizing instances. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers. All of this in just one dashboard is very helpful to improve agility and resolve issues, especially for the workloads. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth helps manage compliance risks by preventing threats, stopping attacks, detecting threats, and securing workloads or endpoints where customers will be using the endpoints. The positive impact on my organization is substantial because we can reduce waste, optimize expenses, drive accountability, and secure the budget from unnecessary cloud costs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything in CloudStack works effectively."

"CloudStack is simple to stand up and get off the ground in a hurry."

"We increased our IaaS sales by 30% and our deploy time of VM/instances has been reduced from one day to one minute."

"CloudStack provides an easy way to have high availability (HA) of the virtual machines and helps with a better SLA."

"Being able to completely virtualize a customer’s physical data center and migrate any workload into the cloud, and cover the most complex use cases - while offering high performance and true volume QoS, backed by SSD-based managed storage - is what differentiates it from other IaaS solutions."

"CloudStack is highly stable."

"I can recommend CloudStack because there are a lot of large companies using it in production for critical mission systems, and everything else."

"The most valuable feature from my point of view is access to environment via console through separate browser window."

More CloudStack pros

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

"Compared to AWS, the historic data on CloudHealth is a lot more helpful."

"It's one of our core tools within our Zones Cloud Platforms tool bag, when we're looking at how we help customers optimize their cloud spend across their Azure and AWS environments today."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations."

"The zones need to be more stable. During moving and first deployment there were a lot of issues."

"Factors that need improvement are: Visualization in terms of the resources usage. The user interface. Providing best error feedback to the users."

"CloudStack lacks a billing solution which would complete it as a full 360-degree product."

"From time to time there is a bug in calculating limits of resources for customer domain/account. Maybe it’s a problem with 4.9.2."

"More integration with third-party products (we know that OpenStack has a better level of integration)."

"I encountered some stability issues. When I tried to remove high-capacity virtual machines it took a long time to update, and sometimes the VM status failed to update properly in the cloud database. This occurred multiple times, even though I had sufficient resources."

"VPN P2S is cutting all connections except the CloudStack environment for the user when he is connected. I would like to have VPN like Cisco's AnyConnect."

More CloudStack cons

"Apptio Cloudability has better granular visibility of data that is missing in CloudHealth."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create an easier setup and implementation."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"The Perspectives feature could be better. I would like to have more automation and flexibility to put in data and react to a certain event."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

I do not see any flaws in VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. Everything is fine for me. The performance is acceptable, and the layout is acceptable. It is very user-friendly, and there is nothing that needs...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudHealth?

This product was used for financial management in my company because I was working for a FinTech. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's use case is related to financial control and resource governance across ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's analytics in understanding cloud usage trends and expense forecasts is normally more for marketing staff and analyzing production servers in my case, so I am not very exp...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 9% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

CloudCheckr vs CloudStack

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

Yuki Snowflake Optimization Platform vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 5% of the time

CloudCheckr vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 5% of the time

CloudBolt vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 4% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

June 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2026

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

CloudStack offers an easy-to-manage platform compatible with multiple hypervisors, enabling seamless networking and efficient workload scaling. Its advanced APIs and open-source nature facilitate automation and customization, making it ideal for extensive cloud environments.

CloudStack is recognized for ease of setup, robust networking, and hypervisor compatibility. Supporting a range of workloads, it scales efficiently, offering flexible features like VM migration, private networking, and multi-zone support. Its user-friendly open-source design aids troubleshooting and customization, making it ideal for managing broad cloud deployments. Despite needing upgrades in interface and integration with third-party vendors and container technology, CloudStack remains a strong choice for businesses seeking effective virtualization solutions. Improvements in documentation, regional management, and emerging tech support would enhance usability and performance.

What are CloudStack's notable features?

Hypervisor compatibility: Supports diverse virtualization technologies for flexible deployment.
Robust networking: Ensures reliable and scalable network infrastructure management across zones.
Advanced APIs: Facilitates automation and integration to streamline cloud operations.
VM migration: Enhances operational flexibility with seamless virtual machine relocations.
Private networking: Provides secure and isolated network environments for critical tasks.
Multi-zone support: Offers scalable solutions for distributed cloud management.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Open-source model: Allows extensive customization without licensing costs, enhancing ROI.
Ease of management: Simplifies operations, reducing time and resources spent on maintenance.
Scalability: Enables growth and adaptability, fostering agility in expanding businesses.
Flexibility: Supports various workloads and environments, meeting diverse operational needs.

CloudStack is implemented across industries, used in managing virtual environments, offering IaaS in public, private, and hybrid cloud models. Companies use it for internal virtualization and customer service, integrating with hypervisors across data centers to orchestrate virtual machines and support development and testing globally.

Apache

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides an intuitive dashboard, pricing flexibility, and accountability features, helping users allocate cloud costs, enhance security, and optimize expenses for improved cloud management.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth stands out for its comprehensive cloud cost allocation by team, ensuring expense optimization and increased security. Its compliance management, scalability, and competitive pricing offer significant advantages. The platform facilitates monitoring across multi-cloud environments and delivers cost-saving recommendations. Transparent reporting and robust support enhance agility and aid in effective issue resolution.

What are the key features of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Intuitive Dashboard: Simplifies cloud management with user-friendly interfaces.
Pricing Flexibility: Offers adaptable pricing models to suit diverse needs.
Accountability Features: Supports team-based cost allocation and tracking.
Compliance Management: Ensures security standards are consistently met.
Scalability: Supports elastic growth and resource management across environments.
Performance Optimization: Provides tools to optimize cloud performance and reduce waste.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Cost Savings: Identifies opportunities to optimize cloud spending.
Improved Security: Enhances cloud security protocols and monitoring.
Transparent Reporting: Delivers clear and detailed usage and cost reports.
Efficient Issue Resolution: Streamlines processes for swift problem-solving.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is extensively implemented for cloud expenditure management in multi-cloud landscapes, aiding sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail in leveraging dashboards for enhanced transparency and financial control. Users rely on the platform for monitoring health conditions, reporting costs, optimizing spending, and driving accountability through detailed analytics and insights.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

June 2026

Free Report: CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.