Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloverETL vs ViaSQL by Adaptigent comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL
Ranking in Data Integration
62nd
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Visualization (45th)
ViaSQL by Adaptigent
Ranking in Data Integration
65th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ViaSQL by Adaptigent is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

it_user854766 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors
* Familiar, intuitive GUI (Eclipse plug-in) coming from a Java development background. * In-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation. * Responsive support through forums, even directly from Clover staff. * Wealth of pre-defined components. * All components are customizable. * Descriptive logging, especially for error messages. * Ease of install/light footprint.
Use ViaSQL by Adaptigent?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
GT Software Ivory Suite, Ivory Data Access
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
Landesbank Baden-Württemberg (LBBW), France Galop, Benefit Programs Administration (BPA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Talend and others in Data Integration. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.