Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cmd vs Systancia IPdiva Safe comparison

Cmd and Systancia are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Cmd is ranked #44, while Systancia is ranked #37. Cmd holds a 0.1% mindshare in PAM, compared to Systancia’s 0.3% mindshare.
Cmd
  • 91 Views
  • 32 Comparison Views
Systancia IPdiva Safe
  • 113 Views
  • 82 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Cmd and Systancia IPdiva Safe based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,600 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cmd
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
44th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Systancia IPdiva Safe
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
37th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of Cmd is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Systancia IPdiva Safe is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
WALLIX Bastion vs Systancia IPdiva Safe Logo
WALLIX Bastion vs Systancia IPdiva Safe
Compared 100% of the time
More Systancia IPdiva Safe Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
Cmd reportDownload Cmd product report
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
Systancia IPdiva Safe reportDownload Systancia IPdiva Safe product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
IPdiva Cleanroom, Systancia IPdiva Safe
 

Overview

Cmd is a Linux command-line visibility, protection, and authorization platform that's powerful yet easy to use.

Cmd
IPdiva Safe is a privileged access management (PAM) solution that enables the video recording of privileged-user sessions, offering advanced real-time analysis capabilities for detecting abnormal or suspicious behaviour, as well as cyberthreats, as of the very first intrusion attempt. IPdiva Safe's intelligent engine also enables the automating of protective actions that stop malicious users.
Systancia
 

Sample Customers

Uber, zenefits, REDOX, Qubole, eagleview, Gremlin
Beaumanoir Group, Gelmalto, Wurth or University Hospital in Bordeaux, Botanic, Cassidian Cyber Security, CAT Group, University Hospital in Nantes, Grosfillex, Labeyrie, L’occitane, Gagneraud Construction, University Hospital in Caen, Picoty...
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
April 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.