Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codebashing vs Veracode Security Labs comparison

Checkmarx and Veracode are both solutions in the Application Security Training category. Checkmarx is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Veracode is ranked #2. Checkmarx holds a 35.0% mindshare in ASTS, compared to Veracode’s 16.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veracode users who would recommend it.
Codebashing
Read 10 Codebashing reviews
  • 580 Views
  • 233 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
Veracode Security Labs
Read 10 Veracode Security Labs reviews
  • 481 Views
  • 148 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Codebashing and Veracode Security Labs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Training solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Codebashing vs. Veracode Security Labs Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Codebashing vs. Veracode Security Labs
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Codebashing
Ranking in Application Security Training
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veracode Security Labs
Ranking in Application Security Training
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Training category, the mindshare of Codebashing is 35.0%, up from 34.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode Security Labs is 16.9%, down from 25.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Training
 

Featured Reviews

Taniya Roy - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good stability and availability of comprehensive documentation
The platform is simple, easy to use, and easy to learn. It has comprehensive guidelines and a lot of documents and videos for an easy installation process. Apart from some default rules, it allows users to configure their own rules. Also, it is easy to configure as it has an extensive library for reference.
Read full review
Darshan Makhecha - PeerSpot reviewer
We are more productive because we work smarter and optimize the reporting pathway
The solution provides guidance on how to fix vulnerabilities. Veracode has robust reporting and data analytics. I manage key accounts, and data analysis is essential for anyone in a critical sales role. Veracode gives us a comprehensive analysis and reporting structure. When we input data from different teams, we have different criteria for analysis, like performance over time and performance versus target benchmarks. The reporting works well for these key performance indicators. Veracode developers have maintained an end-to-end security approach. The platform is highly secure. Users can secure their data and access it at any time based on their requirements. It makes data analysis easier and more user-friendly. Security Labs has an excellent mechanism for reducing the errors introduced into the system. It also acts as a resistant wall that blocks viruses and rapidly fixes the vulnerable components. It works optimally for my current use. In terms of compliance and governing regulations, this solution works well. It complies with all government norms and global IT documentation. Productivity has slowly improved because the Static Analytic tool helps me save time. In the end, we are more productive because we work smarter and optimize the reporting pathway. Veracode also integrates with our development tools, which is helpful because our IT team is incorporating other functions in their backend. This solution is a firewall for the workflows. It filters your data, and it will block any kind of threat or malware. A warning pops up, and it says you need to take care of the issue. It has raised developer confidence by mitigating risks. It limits access to specific users at a given time. It's a good tool in terms of secure access.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The platform is simple, easy to use, and easy to learn."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with WhiteSource, which allows for open-source scanning."
"There's a lot of flexibility and there are a lot of configuration options."
"According to the feedback, it's an easy-to-use application tool."
"The most valuable feature is that you get the security from the design of the training. It ensures our developers write code securely and effectively. They will not write code that is vulnerable to hackers."
"The installation phase of the tool is simple."
"From an academic point of view, Codebashing is a very good product because it is based on gamification. This is especially true if you don't have any idea about secure code training. It is one of the best tools in the world to learn secure coding. The product explains very well how vulnerabilities can be found and how programmers can develop securely."
"There are lots of great plugins available."
More Codebashing pros
"The features are so extensive, which is why they are ahead of the game, and the reason I continue to use this solution."
"It provides a complete review of vulnerabilities & possible fixes for OWASP Top 10 in one place."
"I like the end-to-end learning experience. That also includes SAST. It has a low false positive rate."
"The best part is that this is all within the web browser, so the developer doesn't have to install any development environments or download anything to work through the training."
"Our developers are more security-aware and are writing better code. The e-learning option allows our developers to dig deeper into the security issues. Topics such as sanitizing input, carefully configured logging output, and other typical sources of vulnerabilities."
"The coding challenges were well put together and I was happy to see some of the challenges even had a built-in web browser."
"The hands-on training has helped us to tackle modern threats by coding with vulnerabilities in mind from the beginning of a project. It has improved our process overall, and the number of vulnerabilities has been reduced."
"Veracode Security Labs is very good for providing examples of code vulnerabilities in a developer’s chosen language. This is important because if a flaw is found, then they provide me with a few examples of how to implement it. I don't need to go to Google and try to figure it out myself. They already provide me with some good quality examples that I can use to implement the fix."
More Veracode Security Labs pros
 

Cons

"I believe that certificates should be issued to users so that they can be used as proof of having completed that training. The certificate is currently not being used for any competence validation outside of the chance environment."
"It isn't a very friendly tool for beginners. In our company, we have to take training courses to learn how to use the platform."
"It would be helpful if the solution included tests or exams that would allow you to study, for example, all Java vulnerabilities, and then afterward test your knowledge."
"If customers would be able to define their own quizzes or exams, it would be very good. That is the only missing part that I see - customer based scenarios, examinations and quizzes."
"This solution could be improved by offering an increased number of quizzes after each module. The GUI for this solution could also be updated to be more modern."
"The solution should make the configuration more simple. Sometimes the configuration is complex."
"From my perspective, Codebashing might use some enhancement. Clients should be able to handle their tests directly according to their needs. That aspect of Codebashing is currently inflexible. Customers would wish to sign, compile, or manage their tests in accordance with their requirements. It is just not possible."
"This solution is available for Windows only and does not have a Linux distribution."
More Codebashing cons
"Web application development covers much of the industry, but there are also developers working with these other technologies that could benefit from a learning environment more specific to their technologies."
"The only area of this solution that needs improvement is the pricing for startups."
"There could be better integration between the API and the pipeline systems."
"Veracode Security Labs should cover more than only the OWASP Top 10."
"Developers frequently complain to me about the user interface and the difficulty in navigating the web site."
"There are two parts that I think should be improved. Both the web page and the report have the same issue. Both are sometimes messy and very difficult to find information. You need to know where to look and especially where to find information. It can be a bit confusing in both the report and the web page. Quite often, I keep learning new things because some of the information is quite hidden. You need to click this link, then click here, and go here. Then, "Wow," you get so much information that you didn't know existed. Information is a bit hidden and there should be an easier way to access it after a scan is generated."
"Its ability to handle more types of files and making it work better with databasing and other API could be improved."
"I would have liked to see a bit better auto-completion in the IDE, and there was a typo in one of the questions where the code you were supposed to copy was missing a pair of parentheses."
More Veracode Security Labs cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would prefer it if their pricing would be a bit cheaper. This is not my personal comment, this is the comment of the market."
"Licenses are renewed annually."
"This solution is not freeware and more expensive than similar products."
"As a developer, though I am unaware of the cost of the solution, the product is expensive since I faced some trouble upgrading to Python for Codebashing."
"They have a Community Edition of this product that can be used free of charge."
"It's expensive. Know that going in. Your organization, your programmers, and your product will be better for it though."
"The pricing for qualified startups should only charge for Veracode Developer Training."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Training solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
Computer Software Company
26%
Insurance Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Codebashing?
The platform is simple, easy to use, and easy to learn.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Codebashing?
As a developer, though I am unaware of the cost of the solution, the product is expensive since I faced some trouble upgrading to Python for Codebashing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Codebashing?
The product's pricing could be more flexible. At present, we have to buy an entire instance. Instead, they could introduce a pricing model based on specific requirements.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Codebashing Logo
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Codebashing
Compared 78% of the time
More Codebashing Competitors
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Veracode Security Labs Logo
Secure Code Warrior Learning Platform vs Veracode Security Labs
Compared 53% of the time
More Veracode Security Labs Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Codebashing
December 2024
Codebashing reportDownload Codebashing product report
Buyer's Guide
Veracode Security Labs
November 2024
Veracode Security Labs reportDownload Veracode Security Labs product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Veracode Developer Training
 

Learn More

Checkmarx
Veracode
 

Overview

Checkmarx Codebashing is an application security learning platform providing interactive secure code training for developers. Modern applications are increasingly under attack, yet many developers lack the knowledge to write code securely. Codebashing fills this gap with a gamified learning experience that covers various aspects of application security.


Codebashing features interactive learning modules covering common security vulnerabilities like SQL injection, XSS, and cross-site request forgery. Real-world scenarios and challenges help developers apply their knowledge practically and in the relevant programming languages, while personalized learning paths cater to individual skill levels and objectives. Integration with development workflows ensures seamless adoption into existing processes.


By improving developers’ security knowledge, Codebashing helps organizations better secure application development from the very first line of code. Benefits include improved application security posture, increased developer productivity, alignment with regulatory requirements, and the promotion of a security-first culture.

Veracode Security Labs shifts application security knowledge left, training developers to tackle modern threats in the evolving cybersecurity landscape by exploiting and patching real code, and applying DevSecOps principles to deliver secure code on time. Through hands-on labs that use modern web apps written in your chosen languages, developers learn the skills and strategies that are directly applicable to an organization's code. With detailed progress reporting, email assignments, and a leaderboard, developers are encouraged to continuously level up their secure coding skills. When development is empowered to fix security defects and reduce risk, security teams are better supported to scale AppSec programs, meet compliance requirements, and achieve business outcomes.

 

Sample Customers

Fitbit, Microsoft, Just Eat, NCC Group, National Bank of Abu Dhabi, Sky
McKESSON, Alfresco
Buyer's Guide
Codebashing vs. Veracode Security Labs
December 2024
Free Report: Codebashing vs. Veracode Security Labs
Find out what your peers are saying about Codebashing vs. Veracode Security Labs and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Codebashing vs. Veracode Security Labs report.
See our list of best Application Security Training vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Training reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.