Cohesity Data Cloud vs IBM Storage Protect comparison

Cohesity and IBM are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Cohesity is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.5. Cohesity holds a 0.3% mindshare in BRS, compared to IBM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cohesity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Cohesity Data Cloud

Read 8 Cohesity Data Cloud reviews

432 Views
261 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Storage Protect

Read 3 IBM Storage Protect reviews

343 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cohesity Data Cloud

IBM Storage Protect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Cohesity Data Cloud and IBM Storage Protect compete in data management solutions. IBM Storage Protect appears superior due to its extensive features, making it worth the investment.

Features: Cohesity Data Cloud offers comprehensive data protection, efficient data recovery, and cost-effective setup. IBM Storage Protect provides advanced security features, robust scalability, and extensive feature richness.

Room for Improvement: Cohesity Data Cloud needs better cloud integration, enhanced reporting, and improved API capabilities. IBM Storage Protect requires a more intuitive setup, stronger API capabilities, and better support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cohesity Data Cloud is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. IBM Storage Protect, though powerful, demands detailed setup and has mixed feedback on support.

Pricing and ROI: Cohesity Data Cloud presents lower costs and quick ROI. IBM Storage Protect, despite higher initial costs, provides strong long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Cohesity Data Cloud vs. IBM Storage Protect Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud vs. IBM Storage Protect

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cohesity Data Cloud

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

40th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (34th), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th)

IBM Storage Protect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Storage Protect is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

AmarpreetSingh

Technical Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers improved data protection and security with indirect ROI

The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions. Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups. Although this is an emerging tool and there is room for growth, it needs to mature further. There is an AI feature, however, it is still in the development phase and requires substantial improvements.

Read full review

Maik Zutz

Produktverantwortlicher Storage und Backup at BITMARCK TECHNIK GmbH

A stable enterprise solution for backup and restore

New workloads are not good for storage protect like container or virtual machines. IBM acknowledges that users and partners with companies do it better and integrate it into the product. It takes too much time to implement it in old Storage Protect. It have features for big databases and big data environments. Although, the product seems to be old fashioned, but it is stable, robust and works for the most use cases where a lot of data is to be protected. It could be easier to manage client data. You have to use configuration. It is not on modern architecture. They should change it on the client area. You can achieve a better environment using Protect. IBM tapes serves as an air gap, consumes less energy, and provides a resilient, stable environment with fewer infrastructure and environmental costs. Intergrating it can help store large amounts of data more cheaper than on disk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate the Cohesity Data Cloud solution a ten out of ten. It's an easy-to-use product that provides substantial value and security."

"Our data center size occupancy for Cohesity appliance is reduced by 70% when we installed Cohesity."

"I definitely recommend this tool to others due to its simplicity, security, features, and flexibility."

"It is easy to install and use."

"Its big data and archive data features are the features that I have found most valuable. I can use it in a big virtual environment."

"I find the most important feature to be data protection."

"It's very regimented and fast. It does local backup, cloud backup, long-term coverage, and disaster recovery."

"The clone feature is very nice. You can restore workloads onto Cohesity's storage, which is also nice to have when you don't have enough space to restore on the server."

More Cohesity Data Cloud pros

"The tool's backup engine is very powerful. Previously, our client finished backup with HPE product in 48 hours. IBM Storage Protect completes backup in 8 hours."

"Overall, my experience with the solution is very positive, and I rate it a 9 out of 10."

"The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future."

Cons

"The limitation that I see in Cohesity is that the minimum sized node is 36 terabytes, which is more than a small customer needs."

"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."

"It has never been touted as a tier-one storage platform, and that would be a benefit. They are currently working on solving that issue."

"The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth."

"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."

More Cohesity Data Cloud cons

"Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Protect does not work well with virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product should improve its GUI. It should also support Windows clustering."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."

"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."

"It's priced properly for the market."

"IBM Storage Protect is not expensive and fits the needs of all business types. The licensing is based on a capacity-based model. You can take a license for one, two, or three terabytes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?

While Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes, it offers value by meeting compliance needs and providing protection against ransomware attacks. The pricing is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth. Reading data from the cloud can incur additional costs, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary use case for Cohesity Data Cloud is to offer an additional layer of protection for backup data, which I can restore if needed. It is a managed service that allows me to set up and confi...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Storage Protect?

The best point about IBM Storage Protect is that it can use IBM tape environments, which we still use and will continue to use in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Storage Protect?

IBM Storage Protect is generally an expensive tool. However, with good contracts with IBM or its partners, the cost might not be so high. New customers can expect very high prices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Storage Protect?

Some features are outdated as the product does not use the latest technologies. The graphical user interface, known as the operation center, is not very well designed. Additionally, IBM Storage Pro...

See all answers

Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 23% of the time

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 20% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Rubrik vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

More Cohesity Data Cloud Competitors

IBM Spectrum Protect vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 61% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 24% of the time

IBM Storage Protect Plus vs IBM Storage Protect

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Storage Protect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud

April 2025

Download Cohesity Data Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

March 2025

Download IBM Storage Protect product report

Also Known As

Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios

No data available

Overview

Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.

Cohesity

IBM Storage Protect is designed for data backup and recovery, ensuring protection of critical information and business continuity. It is ideal for managing large-scale datasets and offers compatibility across cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Storage Protect provides robust data backup and recovery features, supporting multiple workloads while integrating effortlessly with different platforms. It is known for reliable performance, scalability for growing storage needs, and automation of repetitive tasks. Users find it effective in protecting expansive datasets through efficient deduplication.

What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?

Data Backup and Recovery: Comprehensive data protection in diverse environments.
Integration: Seamless collaboration with various systems.
Scalability: Handles growing storage demands effectively.
Deduplication: Efficient data deduplication to optimize storage use.

What benefits or ROI should be considered when evaluating IBM Storage Protect?

Reliable Performance: Consistently protects multiple workloads.
Compatibility: Works well with cloud and on-premises systems.
Automation: Automates repetitive tasks to save time and resources.

IBM Storage Protect is implemented in various industries, supporting sectors with significant data management requirements like finance, healthcare, and retail. These industries benefit from its robust data protection, scalability, and ease of integration, making it a preferred choice for organizations with large and complex datasets.

IBM

Sample Customers

Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud vs. IBM Storage Protect

April 2025

Free Report: Cohesity Data Cloud vs. IBM Storage Protect

Find out what your peers are saying about Cohesity Data Cloud vs. IBM Storage Protect and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cohesity Data Cloud vs. IBM Storage Protect report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.