Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Contrast Security Assess vs IMMUNIO [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Contrast Security Assess provides scalable application deployment in various environments, adapting to cloud and on-premises with robust change management.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Contrast Security Assess excels in IAST, reducing false positives, offering real-time insights and seamless security integration for developers.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.0
Contrast Security Assess needs better documentation, tech support, agent upgrades, scanning rules, reporting, and improved setup for comprehensive usability.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Contrast Security Assess is praised for stability, easy deployment, and minimal downtime, despite ColdFusion support challenges.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.0
Contrast Security Assess offers responsive support with knowledgeable staff, but some users seek improved response times for complex issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
2.0
Contrast Security Assess offers flexible, cost-effective pricing based on applications or servers, suitable for various enterprise environments.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Contrast Security Assess
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (29th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (24th)
IMMUNIO [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution that provides lots of details on web-based vulnerabilities and source code reviews
Technical support for the solution should be faster. We have to further analyze what kind of CVEs are in the reported libraries and what part of the code is affected. That analysis can be added to the report that Contrast Security Assess gives. Further analysis should be done of the third-party libraries report that it gives. The solution should provide more details in the section where it shows that third-party libraries have CVEs or some vulnerabilities. The onboarding or the setup of Contrast Security Assess can get a little easier.
Use IMMUNIO [EOL]?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Contrast Security Assess?
When we access the application, it continuously monitors and detects vulnerabilities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Contrast Security Assess?
The product's pricing is low. I would rate it a two out of ten.
What needs improvement with Contrast Security Assess?
Technical support for the solution should be faster. We have to further analyze what kind of CVEs are in the reported libraries and what part of the code is affected. That analysis can be added to ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Contrast Assess
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.
SurveyMonkey, Nuna, Involvio, Toptal
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.